Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia in Switzerland in the face of rapid development of effective drugs.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dominik Heim, Helen Baldomero, Michael Medinger, Stavroula Masouridi-Levrat, Urs Schanz, Gayathri Nair, Tayfun Güngör, Jörg Halter, Jakob R Passweg, Yves Chalandon
{"title":"Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia in Switzerland in the face of rapid development of effective drugs.","authors":"Dominik Heim, Helen Baldomero, Michael Medinger, Stavroula Masouridi-Levrat, Urs Schanz, Gayathri Nair, Tayfun Güngör, Jörg Halter, Jakob R Passweg, Yves Chalandon","doi":"10.57187/s.3754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Until the year 2000, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was the standard treatment for young and fit chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. CML was the main indication for allogeneic HCT. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors changed the treatment of CML patients dramatically. Allogeneic HCT was rapidly replaced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for CML, and the indication shifted to the treatment of non-responders, patients intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and patients whose CML is transforming to the accelerated phase and blast crisis. This paper describes changes in the use of transplantation technology for CML patients in the face of rapid drug development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients receiving a transplant for CML between 1997 and 2021 in Switzerland were included in the study. For the purpose of this analysis, time periods were analysed in quinquennia, 1997-2001 (Q1), 2002-2006 (Q2), 2007-2011 (Q3), 2012-2016 (Q4) and 2017-2021 (Q5), as the observation period spanned 25 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 239 patients received a transplant. These included 96 in Q1, 56 in Q2, 25 in Q3, 34 in Q4 and 28 in Q5. Patient characteristics changed over time: recent patients were older and had a longer interval from diagnosis to transplantation because of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the proportions of patients receiving transplants during an early versus advanced disease stage differed little. Transplant technology changed, as well. Patients received intensive conditioning regimens less often due to higher age and more commonly had peripheral blood as opposed to bone marrow transplants. However, the type of stem cell donor selected did not differ. In a univariable analysis, there were no significant differences in survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence or incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease among the five quinquennia. In a multivariable analysis, older age, donors other than HLA-identical siblings and more advanced disease stage, but not the quinquennium, were associated with higher risk of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors haematopoietic cell transplantation has been used less frequently to treat CML. Patients in recent cohorts received transplants at an older age and later in the disease course; despite these higher risks, the outcome of allogeneic HCT has not worsened over time but has not improved, either. As the outcome is worse in advanced phases, it is important to conduct transplants before disease progression. Therefore, patients with advanced disease should be monitored closely and receive transplants in time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Until the year 2000, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was the standard treatment for young and fit chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. CML was the main indication for allogeneic HCT. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors changed the treatment of CML patients dramatically. Allogeneic HCT was rapidly replaced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for CML, and the indication shifted to the treatment of non-responders, patients intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and patients whose CML is transforming to the accelerated phase and blast crisis. This paper describes changes in the use of transplantation technology for CML patients in the face of rapid drug development.

Methods: All patients receiving a transplant for CML between 1997 and 2021 in Switzerland were included in the study. For the purpose of this analysis, time periods were analysed in quinquennia, 1997-2001 (Q1), 2002-2006 (Q2), 2007-2011 (Q3), 2012-2016 (Q4) and 2017-2021 (Q5), as the observation period spanned 25 years.

Results: Overall, 239 patients received a transplant. These included 96 in Q1, 56 in Q2, 25 in Q3, 34 in Q4 and 28 in Q5. Patient characteristics changed over time: recent patients were older and had a longer interval from diagnosis to transplantation because of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the proportions of patients receiving transplants during an early versus advanced disease stage differed little. Transplant technology changed, as well. Patients received intensive conditioning regimens less often due to higher age and more commonly had peripheral blood as opposed to bone marrow transplants. However, the type of stem cell donor selected did not differ. In a univariable analysis, there were no significant differences in survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence or incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease among the five quinquennia. In a multivariable analysis, older age, donors other than HLA-identical siblings and more advanced disease stage, but not the quinquennium, were associated with higher risk of death.

Conclusion: Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors haematopoietic cell transplantation has been used less frequently to treat CML. Patients in recent cohorts received transplants at an older age and later in the disease course; despite these higher risks, the outcome of allogeneic HCT has not worsened over time but has not improved, either. As the outcome is worse in advanced phases, it is important to conduct transplants before disease progression. Therefore, patients with advanced disease should be monitored closely and receive transplants in time.

在瑞士,面对有效药物的快速发展,异体造血细胞移植治疗慢性骨髓性白血病。
目的:在 2000 年之前,异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)是治疗年轻、健康的慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的标准疗法。CML 是异基因造血干细胞移植的主要适应症。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的问世极大地改变了对 CML 患者的治疗。异基因造血干细胞移植迅速被酪氨酸激酶抑制剂取代,成为 CML 的一线治疗方法,适应症也转为治疗无应答者、对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂不耐受的患者以及 CML 正向加速期和爆破危象转化的患者。本文介绍了在药物快速发展的情况下,CML 患者使用移植技术的变化:研究纳入了 1997 年至 2021 年间瑞士所有接受移植治疗的 CML 患者。为了进行分析,以五年为一个时间段进行分析:1997-2001年(Q1)、2002-2006年(Q2)、2007-2011年(Q3)、2012-2016年(Q4)和2017-2021年(Q5),因为观察期跨越了25年:共有 239 名患者接受了移植手术。其中第一季度 96 人,第二季度 56 人,第三季度 25 人,第四季度 34 人,第五季度 28 人。随着时间的推移,患者的特征发生了变化:近期的患者年龄较大,而且由于接受了酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗,从确诊到接受移植的时间间隔较长。不过,在疾病早期和晚期接受移植的患者比例差别不大。移植技术也发生了变化。由于患者年龄较大,接受强化调理治疗的情况较少,而且更多患者接受的是外周血移植,而非骨髓移植。不过,选择的干细胞捐献者类型并无不同。在单变量分析中,五个五年期的存活率、无进展存活率、非复发死亡率、复发率或急性和慢性移植物抗宿主疾病发病率均无明显差异。在一项多变量分析中,年龄较大、供体不是HLA相同的兄弟姐妹以及疾病分期较晚与较高的死亡风险有关,但与五年期无关:结论:自酪氨酸激酶抑制剂问世以来,造血细胞移植用于治疗慢性骨髓性白血病的频率有所下降。尽管风险较高,异基因造血干细胞移植的疗效并没有随着时间的推移而恶化,但也没有得到改善。由于晚期患者的预后较差,因此在疾病进展之前进行移植非常重要。因此,应密切监测晚期患者,及时进行移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信