Characterising the challenges of managing difficult red blood cell alloantibodies in liver transplant recipients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Yevgen Chornenkyy, Margaret Catherine Fink, Christopher Felicelli, Sean R Stowell, Glenn Eugene Ramsey, Guang-Yu Yang
{"title":"Characterising the challenges of managing difficult red blood cell alloantibodies in liver transplant recipients.","authors":"Yevgen Chornenkyy, Margaret Catherine Fink, Christopher Felicelli, Sean R Stowell, Glenn Eugene Ramsey, Guang-Yu Yang","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Formation of red blood cell alloantibodies (RBCAs) complicates transfusion support in liver transplantation (LT). Difficult RBCAs (DAs, >3 antibodies or antibodies for which <25% donors are antigen negative) further challenge care. This study characterises DA outcomes relative to non-difficult RBCAs (NDAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, retrospective analysis of LT patients (2002-2021). RBCAs were defined as clinically significant antibodies. DAs were compared with NDAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89 patients had clinically significant RBCAs (DA=50, NDA=39). More DAs were anti-Jka, anti-M; fewer were anti-E, anti-K (all p<0.05). DA patients often had multiple antibodies (44% vs 12.8% NDA, p=0.0022). Probability of finding antigen-negative blood was lower for DAs (17.4% vs 68.1% NDA, p<0.0001) as was RBCs received (9.4 vs 14.7 units in NDA, p=0.0036). Although survival was similar, patients with DAs had more adverse reactions (8% vs 0%, p=0.128). Some antibodies appeared to occur with specific liver diseases (such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, alcoholic steatohepatitis and recurrent disease); however, due to low sample size, definitive conclusions cannot be made.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DA LT recipients contain >1 RBCA, have a lower probability of finding antigen negative blood and may experience more adverse transfusion event (ATE). Despite this, the incidence of ATEs was still quite low.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"641-647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Formation of red blood cell alloantibodies (RBCAs) complicates transfusion support in liver transplantation (LT). Difficult RBCAs (DAs, >3 antibodies or antibodies for which <25% donors are antigen negative) further challenge care. This study characterises DA outcomes relative to non-difficult RBCAs (NDAs).

Methods: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of LT patients (2002-2021). RBCAs were defined as clinically significant antibodies. DAs were compared with NDAs.

Results: 89 patients had clinically significant RBCAs (DA=50, NDA=39). More DAs were anti-Jka, anti-M; fewer were anti-E, anti-K (all p<0.05). DA patients often had multiple antibodies (44% vs 12.8% NDA, p=0.0022). Probability of finding antigen-negative blood was lower for DAs (17.4% vs 68.1% NDA, p<0.0001) as was RBCs received (9.4 vs 14.7 units in NDA, p=0.0036). Although survival was similar, patients with DAs had more adverse reactions (8% vs 0%, p=0.128). Some antibodies appeared to occur with specific liver diseases (such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, alcoholic steatohepatitis and recurrent disease); however, due to low sample size, definitive conclusions cannot be made.

Conclusions: DA LT recipients contain >1 RBCA, have a lower probability of finding antigen negative blood and may experience more adverse transfusion event (ATE). Despite this, the incidence of ATEs was still quite low.

分析肝移植受者体内难治性红细胞同种抗体的管理挑战。
目的:红细胞异体抗体(RBCA)的形成使肝移植(LT)中的输血支持变得复杂。难治性红细胞抗体(DAs,>3 种抗体或抗体的方法:对LT患者(2002-2021年)进行单中心回顾性分析。RBCA被定义为具有临床意义的抗体。将DA与NDA进行比较:89名患者有临床意义的RBCA(DA=50,NDA=39)。抗Jka、抗M的DA较多;抗E、抗K的DA较少(均为p):DA LT受血者含有>1个RBCA,找到抗原阴性血液的概率较低,可能会经历更多的不良输血事件(ATE)。尽管如此,ATE 的发生率仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信