Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Sensing and Detection in a Large Global Population

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Sensing and Detection in a Large Global Population","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.02.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) includes features to address sensing and arrhythmia detection challenges presented by its substernal lead location.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In this study, the authors sought to evaluate sensing and detection performance in 299 patients discharged with an EV-ICD in the global pivotal study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed and adjudicated all induced ventricular fibrillation<span> (VF) episodes and spontaneous device-stored episodes that satisfied rate and duration criteria in a programmed ventricular tachycardia (VT)/VF therapy zone.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>At implantation, all EV-ICDs detected induced VF at the programmed sensitivity; 95.9% detected VF with a 3× safety margin. In follow-up, EV-ICDs detected all 59 VT/VF episodes that sustained until therapy. Of 1,034 non-VT/VF episodes, oversensing caused 87.9% and supraventricular tachycardia<span> caused 12.1%. Therapy was withheld in 80.9%, aborted in 10.6%, and delivered in 8.5%. The most common causes of oversensing were myopotentials (61.2%) and P-wave oversensing (PWOS) (19.9%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in only 3.2% of myopotential episodes, but in 21.8% of PWOS episodes. Myopotential oversensing was more common with Ring-Can sensing (</span></span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and correlated with low R-wave amplitude (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). PWOS occurred almost exclusively with Ring1-Ring2 sensing (<em>P</em> = 0.0001) and began with transient decrease in R-wave or increase in P-wave amplitude (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). In software emulation, a new PWOS discriminator significantly reduced total inappropriate detections.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a global population, EV-ICD detected induced and spontaneous VT/VF accurately. Although discriminators withheld detection from most non-VT/VF episodes, inappropriate shocks were common. The most common cause was PWOS, which may be reduced by optimizing sensing at implantation and incorporation of the PWOS discriminator, which is now in the current device. (Extravascular ICD Pivotal Study [EV ICD]; <span><span>NCT04060680</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24001816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) includes features to address sensing and arrhythmia detection challenges presented by its substernal lead location.

Objectives

In this study, the authors sought to evaluate sensing and detection performance in 299 patients discharged with an EV-ICD in the global pivotal study.

Methods

We reviewed and adjudicated all induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes and spontaneous device-stored episodes that satisfied rate and duration criteria in a programmed ventricular tachycardia (VT)/VF therapy zone.

Results

At implantation, all EV-ICDs detected induced VF at the programmed sensitivity; 95.9% detected VF with a 3× safety margin. In follow-up, EV-ICDs detected all 59 VT/VF episodes that sustained until therapy. Of 1,034 non-VT/VF episodes, oversensing caused 87.9% and supraventricular tachycardia caused 12.1%. Therapy was withheld in 80.9%, aborted in 10.6%, and delivered in 8.5%. The most common causes of oversensing were myopotentials (61.2%) and P-wave oversensing (PWOS) (19.9%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in only 3.2% of myopotential episodes, but in 21.8% of PWOS episodes. Myopotential oversensing was more common with Ring-Can sensing (P < 0.0001) and correlated with low R-wave amplitude (P < 0.0001). PWOS occurred almost exclusively with Ring1-Ring2 sensing (P = 0.0001) and began with transient decrease in R-wave or increase in P-wave amplitude (P < 0.0001). In software emulation, a new PWOS discriminator significantly reduced total inappropriate detections.

Conclusions

In a global population, EV-ICD detected induced and spontaneous VT/VF accurately. Although discriminators withheld detection from most non-VT/VF episodes, inappropriate shocks were common. The most common cause was PWOS, which may be reduced by optimizing sensing at implantation and incorporation of the PWOS discriminator, which is now in the current device. (Extravascular ICD Pivotal Study [EV ICD]; NCT04060680)

在全球大量人口中进行血管外植入式心律转复除颤器感应和检测。
背景:血管外(EV)植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)具有多种功能,可解决因其胸骨下导联位置而带来的传感和心律失常检测难题:在本研究中,作者试图评估全球关键研究中 299 名使用 EV-ICD 出院患者的传感和检测性能:我们对所有诱发室颤(VF)发作和自发的设备存储发作进行了审查和判定,这些发作均符合程序化室性心动过速(VT)/室颤治疗区的速率和持续时间标准:结果:在植入时,所有 EV-ICD 都能以编程灵敏度检测到诱发的室颤;95.9% 的 EV-ICD 检测到室颤的安全系数为 3 倍。在随访过程中,EV-ICD 检测到了所有 59 次 VT/VF 发作,并持续到治疗为止。在 1,034 次非 VT/VF 发作中,87.9% 是由于过度敏感引起的,12.1% 是由于室上性心动过速引起的。80.9%的患者暂停了治疗,10.6%的患者中止了治疗,8.5%的患者接受了治疗。最常见的超感原因是肌电位(61.2%)和 P 波超感(PWOS)(19.9%)。仅有 3.2% 的肌电位事件发生了不适当的电击,但有 21.8% 的 PWOS 事件发生了不适当的电击。肌电位过高在环罐感应中更为常见(P < 0.0001),并与低 R 波振幅相关(P < 0.0001)。PWOS 几乎完全发生在环1-环2感应中(P = 0.0001),并以 R 波瞬时降低或 P 波振幅增加开始(P < 0.0001)。在软件模拟中,新的 PWOS 识别器大大减少了不适当的检测总数:在全球人群中,EV-ICD 能准确检测到诱发和自发 VT/VF。尽管鉴别器无法检测到大多数非 VT/VF 发作,但不当电击仍很常见。最常见的原因是PWOS,通过优化植入时的传感并加入PWOS鉴别器(目前的设备已采用该鉴别器),可减少PWOS的发生。(血管外 ICD 关键研究 [EV ICD];NCT04060680)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信