FAPI PET uptake patterns after invasive medical interventions: a single center retrospective analysis.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peter George Maliha, Masatoshi Hotta, Andrea Farolfi, Tristan Grogan, Rejah Alano, Andrea Limon, Ethan Lam, Giuseppe Carlucci, Shadfar Bahri, Ali Salavati, Matthias Benz, Daniel Silverman, Pawan Gupta, Andrew Quon, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Johannes Czernin, Jeremie Calais
{"title":"FAPI PET uptake patterns after invasive medical interventions: a single center retrospective analysis.","authors":"Peter George Maliha, Masatoshi Hotta, Andrea Farolfi, Tristan Grogan, Rejah Alano, Andrea Limon, Ethan Lam, Giuseppe Carlucci, Shadfar Bahri, Ali Salavati, Matthias Benz, Daniel Silverman, Pawan Gupta, Andrew Quon, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Johannes Czernin, Jeremie Calais","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-06733-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-inhibitor (FAPI)-PET tracers allow imaging of the FAP-expressing cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) and also the normal activated fibroblasts (NAF) involved in inflammation/fibrosis that may be present after invasive medical interventions. We evaluated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake patterns post-medical/invasive non-systemic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in 79 consecutive patients who underwent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Investigators reviewed prior patient medical/invasive interventions (surgery, endoscopy, biopsy, radiotherapy, foreign body placement (FBP) defined as implanted medical/surgical material present at time of scan) and characterized the anatomically corresponding FAPI uptake intensity both visually (positive if above surrounding background) and quantitatively (SUVmax). Interventions with missing data/images or confounders of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (partial volume effect, other cause of increased uptake) were excluded. Available correlative FDG, DOTATATE and PSMA PET/CTs were analyzed when available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>163 medical/invasive interventions (mostly surgeries (49%), endoscopies (18%) and non-surgical biopsies (10%)) in 60 subjects were included for analysis. 43/163 (26%) involved FBP. FAPI uptake occurred in 24/163 (15%) of interventions (average SUVmax 3.2 (mild), range 1.5-5.1). The median time-interval post-intervention to FAPI-PET was 47.5 months and was shorter when FAPI uptake was present (median 9.5 months) than when absent (median 60.1 months; p = 0.001). Cut-off time beyond which no FAPI uptake would be present post-intervention without FBP was 8.2 months, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 82, 90, 99 and 31% respectively. No optimal cutoff point could be determined when considering interventions with FBP. No significant difference was detected between frequency of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptake in intervention sites. Compared to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 revealed more frequent and intense post-interventional tracer uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake from medical/invasive interventions without FBP appears to be time dependent, nearly always absent beyond 8 months post-intervention, but frequently present for years with FBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06733-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-inhibitor (FAPI)-PET tracers allow imaging of the FAP-expressing cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) and also the normal activated fibroblasts (NAF) involved in inflammation/fibrosis that may be present after invasive medical interventions. We evaluated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake patterns post-medical/invasive non-systemic interventions.

Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in 79 consecutive patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Investigators reviewed prior patient medical/invasive interventions (surgery, endoscopy, biopsy, radiotherapy, foreign body placement (FBP) defined as implanted medical/surgical material present at time of scan) and characterized the anatomically corresponding FAPI uptake intensity both visually (positive if above surrounding background) and quantitatively (SUVmax). Interventions with missing data/images or confounders of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (partial volume effect, other cause of increased uptake) were excluded. Available correlative FDG, DOTATATE and PSMA PET/CTs were analyzed when available.

Results: 163 medical/invasive interventions (mostly surgeries (49%), endoscopies (18%) and non-surgical biopsies (10%)) in 60 subjects were included for analysis. 43/163 (26%) involved FBP. FAPI uptake occurred in 24/163 (15%) of interventions (average SUVmax 3.2 (mild), range 1.5-5.1). The median time-interval post-intervention to FAPI-PET was 47.5 months and was shorter when FAPI uptake was present (median 9.5 months) than when absent (median 60.1 months; p = 0.001). Cut-off time beyond which no FAPI uptake would be present post-intervention without FBP was 8.2 months, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 82, 90, 99 and 31% respectively. No optimal cutoff point could be determined when considering interventions with FBP. No significant difference was detected between frequency of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]FDG uptake in intervention sites. Compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 revealed more frequent and intense post-interventional tracer uptake.

Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake from medical/invasive interventions without FBP appears to be time dependent, nearly always absent beyond 8 months post-intervention, but frequently present for years with FBP.

Abstract Image

侵入性医疗干预后的 FAPI PET 摄取模式:单中心回顾性分析。
目的成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)抑制剂(FAPI)-PET示踪剂可对表达 FAP 的癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAF)以及参与炎症/纤维化的正常活化成纤维细胞(NAF)进行成像,这些成纤维细胞可能存在于侵入性医疗干预之后。我们评估了医疗/侵入性非系统干预后的[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46摄取模式:这项单中心回顾性分析是针对 79 名连续接受[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT 的患者进行的。研究人员回顾了患者之前的医疗/侵入性干预(手术、内窥镜检查、活检、放疗、异物置入(FBP),异物置入定义为扫描时存在的植入性医疗/手术材料),并从视觉(高于周围背景时为阳性)和定量(SUVmax)两方面描述了解剖学上相应的 FAPI 摄取强度。排除了数据/图像缺失或[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 摄取混杂因素(部分容积效应、摄取增加的其他原因)的干预。对现有的相关 FDG、DOTATATE 和 PSMA PET/CT 进行分析:60名受试者的163项医疗/侵入性干预(主要是手术(49%)、内窥镜检查(18%)和非手术活检(10%))被纳入分析范围。其中 43/163 例(26%)涉及 FBP。在 24/163 例(15%)干预中出现了 FAPI 摄取(平均 SUVmax 为 3.2(轻度),范围为 1.5-5.1)。干预后到 FAPI-PET 的中位时间间隔为 47.5 个月,出现 FAPI 摄取时(中位 9.5 个月)比没有 FAPI 摄取时(中位 60.1 个月;P = 0.001)短。无 FBP 干预后无 FAPI 摄取的截止时间为 8.2 个月,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 82%、90%、99% 和 31%。在考虑使用 FBP 进行干预时,无法确定最佳的分界点。干预部位的[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46和[18F]FDG摄取频率无明显差异。与[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11相比,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46显示介入后示踪剂摄取更频繁、更强烈:结论:[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46在无FBP的医疗/介入治疗中的摄取似乎与时间有关,介入治疗后8个月后几乎总是没有摄取,但在有FBP的情况下却常常存在数年之久。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信