A 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of dietary supplementation with 125 μg/d vitamin D in adults with asthma.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
British Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-28 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1017/S0007114524000953
Stephanie Watkins, Tanja Harrison, Sohail Mushtaq
{"title":"A 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of dietary supplementation with 125 <i>μ</i>g/d vitamin D in adults with asthma.","authors":"Stephanie Watkins, Tanja Harrison, Sohail Mushtaq","doi":"10.1017/S0007114524000953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vitamin D deficiency has previously been linked to higher rates of exacerbation and reduced lung function in asthmatics. Previous randomised controlled trials investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation have mainly focused on children with asthma. Trials involving adults have typically used bolus dosing regimens, and the main outcomes have been patient-focused without investigating underlying inflammation. The present study aimed to conduct a 12-week placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials administering a daily 125 µg vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplement to adults with mild to moderate asthma. A total of 32 participants were randomised to receive either the 125 μg vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplement or an identical matching placebo. The primary outcome of the study was lung function measured by the ratio of FEV<sub>1</sub>:FVC (effect size 2·5) with secondary outcomes including asthma symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers. There was a small but statistically significant higher increase in the mean (±sd) ratio of FEV<sub>1</sub>:FVC from baseline to post-intervention in the vitamin D group (+0·05 ± 0·06) compared with the placebo group (+0·006 ± 0·04, <i>P</i> = 0·04). There was no effect of the intervention on asthma control test scores, or the inflammatory biomarkers measured. There was a moderate, significant association between baseline plasma 25(OH)D concentration and baseline plasma IL-10 (<i>r</i> = 0·527, <i>P</i> = 0·005) and TNF-<i>α</i> (<i>r</i> = −0·498. <i>P</i> = 0·008) concentrations. A daily vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplement led to slightly improved lung function in adult asthmatics and may be a useful adjunct to existing asthma control strategies, particularly for individuals with suboptimal vitamin D status.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524000953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency has previously been linked to higher rates of exacerbation and reduced lung function in asthmatics. Previous randomised controlled trials investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation have mainly focused on children with asthma. Trials involving adults have typically used bolus dosing regimens, and the main outcomes have been patient-focused without investigating underlying inflammation. The present study aimed to conduct a 12-week placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials administering a daily 125 µg vitamin D3 supplement to adults with mild to moderate asthma. A total of 32 participants were randomised to receive either the 125 μg vitamin D3 supplement or an identical matching placebo. The primary outcome of the study was lung function measured by the ratio of FEV1:FVC (effect size 2·5) with secondary outcomes including asthma symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers. There was a small but statistically significant higher increase in the mean (±sd) ratio of FEV1:FVC from baseline to post-intervention in the vitamin D group (+0·05 ± 0·06) compared with the placebo group (+0·006 ± 0·04, P = 0·04). There was no effect of the intervention on asthma control test scores, or the inflammatory biomarkers measured. There was a moderate, significant association between baseline plasma 25(OH)D concentration and baseline plasma IL-10 (r = 0·527, P = 0·005) and TNF-α (r = −0·498. P = 0·008) concentrations. A daily vitamin D3 supplement led to slightly improved lung function in adult asthmatics and may be a useful adjunct to existing asthma control strategies, particularly for individuals with suboptimal vitamin D status.

一项为期 12 周的双盲随机对照试验调查了成人哮喘患者膳食中补充 5000 IU/天(125 µg/天)维生素 D 的效果,结果显示肺功能参数 - FEV1:FVC 比值有所改善。
维生素 D 缺乏与哮喘患者病情加重和肺功能下降的发生率较高有关。以往研究维生素 D 补充剂效果的随机对照试验 (RCT) 主要针对哮喘儿童。涉及成人的试验通常采用栓剂给药方案,主要结果以患者为中心,没有对潜在炎症进行调查。本研究旨在进行一项为期 12 周的安慰剂对照 RCT 试验,为患有轻度至中度哮喘的成人每天补充 5000 IU(125 µg)维生素 D3。共有32名参与者被随机分配接受5000 IU维生素D3补充剂或相同的安慰剂。研究的主要结果是通过 FEV1:FVC 比值测量肺功能(效应大小为 2.5),次要结果包括哮喘症状和炎症生物标志物。FEV1 和 FVC 的平均(± SD)比值从基线到干预后有小幅上升,但具有统计学意义:与安慰剂组(+ 0.006 ± 0.04,P = 0.04)相比,维生素 D 组从基线到干预后的平均(± SD)FEV1:FVC 比值(+ 0.05 ± 0.06)有小幅上升,但有统计学意义。干预措施对哮喘控制测试评分或所测量的炎症生物标志物没有影响。基线血浆25(OH)D浓度与基线血浆IL-10(r = 0.527,p = 0.005)和TNF-α(r = -0.498,p = 0.008)浓度之间存在中度、显著的关联。每日补充维生素 D3 可使成年哮喘患者的肺功能略有改善,可能是现有哮喘控制策略的有效辅助手段,尤其是对维生素 D 状态不达标的人而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信