Revisiting cariprazine for bipolar I disorder maintenance treatment

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maxwell Z. Price, Richard L. Price
{"title":"Revisiting cariprazine for bipolar I disorder maintenance treatment","authors":"Maxwell Z. Price,&nbsp;Richard L. Price","doi":"10.1111/bdi.13453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with interest the study by McIntyre et al. “Cariprazine as a maintenance therapy in the prevention of mood episodes in adults with bipolar I disorder”<span><sup>1</sup></span> concluding that cariprazine was not superior to placebo in relapse prevention. However, based on our clinical experience successfully utilizing cariprazine to treat acute depressive, manic, and mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder, we have also found cariprazine helpful in preventing recurrence for the vast majority of patients who have remained on cariprazine over the past decade, when the dosing regimen is individualized to meet their needs.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Unfortunately, this was not the case for this study protocol, which may have contributed to an incorrect conclusion.</p><p>As a partial dopamine agonist with eightfold greater affinity for D3 than D2 receptors, and higher D3 affinity than one's endogenous dopamine,<span><sup>3</sup></span> cariprazine is a dynamic medication whereby finding the correct dose is critical to optimizing effects and minimizing side effects. Lower doses function as a dopamine agonist such that 1.5 mg daily can rapidly improve bipolar I depression within 2 weeks.<span><sup>3</sup></span> In contrast, higher approved doses, such as 4.5 mg and 6 mg, which function as a dopamine antagonist, may be required for rapid control of mania and psychosis over several days.<span><sup>3</sup></span> At times, patients who are stable on 1.5 mg cannot tolerate 3 mg due to akathisia. The 3 mg dose lies somewhere in between; it may be too dopamine blocking for some depressed patients yet insufficient for control of mania and psychosis. The unique pharmacodynamic features of cariprazine allow the prescriber to dial in the precise dose to meet patients' needs: lower doses for bipolar I depression; higher doses for bipolar mania and mixed episodes, potentially achieving full spectrum coverage as a relatively well-tolerated monotherapy.</p><p>Another unique aspect of cariprazine is the exceedingly long half-life of its active metabolites, and the protracted time to reach a steady state, which can surpass 12 weeks.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Occasionally, dose reduction is appropriate for late-occurring side effects, such as insomnia. It can also take up to 12 weeks following discontinuation for total cariprazine metabolites to become undetectable, and even longer for poor 3A4 metabolizers or for those taking 3A4 inhibitors,<span><sup>3</sup></span> such as cannabis (permitted in this study). This feature enables effective intermittent dosing schedules for those who either cannot tolerate daily dosing,<span><sup>3</sup></span> prefer intermittent dosing, or face challenges with adherence. Unlike many other antipsychotics, we do not typically encounter withdrawal effects with cariprazine due to low binding affinities for acetylcholine and histamine.<span><sup>3</sup></span> In our experience, bipolar I disorder patients who have taken cariprazine over several months may remain stable over several subsequent months following discontinuation due to long-lasting effects.</p><p>These pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations raise many questions as to this study's design. Why force titrate bipolar I depressed patients to 3 mg instead of following FDA guidelines?<span><sup>3</sup></span> During this phase, adverse events leading to discontinuation (67) may be attributable to this aggressive schedule. Conversely, why not allow bipolar I manic and mixed patients to take 4.5 mg or 6 mg as per FDA guidelines?<span><sup>3</sup></span> During this phase, discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy (35) may be attributable to subtherapeutic dosing. Failure to meet randomization criteria (143) may also reflect a lack of individualized dosing. More than half of open-label patients discontinued prior to double-blind randomization limiting the generalizability of the sample to those who do best on the 3 mg, which begs the next question: why lower them to 1.5 mg? A more effective design would have allowed dose titration tailored to index episode, with adjustments permitted during the double-blind phase to address early signs of relapse and/or tolerability, as was the design for oral<span><sup>4</sup></span> and long-acting injectable aripiprazole<span><sup>5</sup></span> bipolar I maintenance studies. Furthermore, why stop the study after only 39 weeks when cariprazine metabolites last longer than that of oral aripiprazole whose maintenance studies were 74 weeks?<span><sup>4</sup></span> The Kaplan–Meier curves just begin to diverge at 36 weeks for both time to any relapse, and for time to manic relapse, which may reflect the higher doses of cariprazine required for mania compared with lower doses sufficient for depression in terms of pharmacodynamic effects.</p><p>Taken in real-world clinical context, this study could likewise conclude that loading 16 weeks of cariprazine 3 mg provides durable relapse prevention of depressive, manic, and mixed episodes in bipolar I disorder, comparable to dose reduction to 1.5 mg, 3 mg continuation, or discontinuation over an additional 39 weeks, “with all symptom and functional improvements maintained.”<span><sup>1</sup></span> Relapse rates were all below 20 percent,<span><sup>1</sup></span> lower than has been found in separate studies of long-term treatment with either oral<span><sup>4</sup></span> or monthly injectable aripiprazole,<span><sup>5</sup></span> which treat manic and mixed episodes but not depressive episodes in bipolar I disorder.</p><p>Both authors participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":"26 5","pages":"491-492"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bdi.13453","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bdi.13453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with interest the study by McIntyre et al. “Cariprazine as a maintenance therapy in the prevention of mood episodes in adults with bipolar I disorder”1 concluding that cariprazine was not superior to placebo in relapse prevention. However, based on our clinical experience successfully utilizing cariprazine to treat acute depressive, manic, and mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder, we have also found cariprazine helpful in preventing recurrence for the vast majority of patients who have remained on cariprazine over the past decade, when the dosing regimen is individualized to meet their needs.2 Unfortunately, this was not the case for this study protocol, which may have contributed to an incorrect conclusion.

As a partial dopamine agonist with eightfold greater affinity for D3 than D2 receptors, and higher D3 affinity than one's endogenous dopamine,3 cariprazine is a dynamic medication whereby finding the correct dose is critical to optimizing effects and minimizing side effects. Lower doses function as a dopamine agonist such that 1.5 mg daily can rapidly improve bipolar I depression within 2 weeks.3 In contrast, higher approved doses, such as 4.5 mg and 6 mg, which function as a dopamine antagonist, may be required for rapid control of mania and psychosis over several days.3 At times, patients who are stable on 1.5 mg cannot tolerate 3 mg due to akathisia. The 3 mg dose lies somewhere in between; it may be too dopamine blocking for some depressed patients yet insufficient for control of mania and psychosis. The unique pharmacodynamic features of cariprazine allow the prescriber to dial in the precise dose to meet patients' needs: lower doses for bipolar I depression; higher doses for bipolar mania and mixed episodes, potentially achieving full spectrum coverage as a relatively well-tolerated monotherapy.

Another unique aspect of cariprazine is the exceedingly long half-life of its active metabolites, and the protracted time to reach a steady state, which can surpass 12 weeks.3 Occasionally, dose reduction is appropriate for late-occurring side effects, such as insomnia. It can also take up to 12 weeks following discontinuation for total cariprazine metabolites to become undetectable, and even longer for poor 3A4 metabolizers or for those taking 3A4 inhibitors,3 such as cannabis (permitted in this study). This feature enables effective intermittent dosing schedules for those who either cannot tolerate daily dosing,3 prefer intermittent dosing, or face challenges with adherence. Unlike many other antipsychotics, we do not typically encounter withdrawal effects with cariprazine due to low binding affinities for acetylcholine and histamine.3 In our experience, bipolar I disorder patients who have taken cariprazine over several months may remain stable over several subsequent months following discontinuation due to long-lasting effects.

These pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations raise many questions as to this study's design. Why force titrate bipolar I depressed patients to 3 mg instead of following FDA guidelines?3 During this phase, adverse events leading to discontinuation (67) may be attributable to this aggressive schedule. Conversely, why not allow bipolar I manic and mixed patients to take 4.5 mg or 6 mg as per FDA guidelines?3 During this phase, discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy (35) may be attributable to subtherapeutic dosing. Failure to meet randomization criteria (143) may also reflect a lack of individualized dosing. More than half of open-label patients discontinued prior to double-blind randomization limiting the generalizability of the sample to those who do best on the 3 mg, which begs the next question: why lower them to 1.5 mg? A more effective design would have allowed dose titration tailored to index episode, with adjustments permitted during the double-blind phase to address early signs of relapse and/or tolerability, as was the design for oral4 and long-acting injectable aripiprazole5 bipolar I maintenance studies. Furthermore, why stop the study after only 39 weeks when cariprazine metabolites last longer than that of oral aripiprazole whose maintenance studies were 74 weeks?4 The Kaplan–Meier curves just begin to diverge at 36 weeks for both time to any relapse, and for time to manic relapse, which may reflect the higher doses of cariprazine required for mania compared with lower doses sufficient for depression in terms of pharmacodynamic effects.

Taken in real-world clinical context, this study could likewise conclude that loading 16 weeks of cariprazine 3 mg provides durable relapse prevention of depressive, manic, and mixed episodes in bipolar I disorder, comparable to dose reduction to 1.5 mg, 3 mg continuation, or discontinuation over an additional 39 weeks, “with all symptom and functional improvements maintained.”1 Relapse rates were all below 20 percent,1 lower than has been found in separate studies of long-term treatment with either oral4 or monthly injectable aripiprazole,5 which treat manic and mixed episodes but not depressive episodes in bipolar I disorder.

Both authors participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship.

重新审视卡哌嗪用于双相情感障碍 I 的维持治疗。
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了麦金太尔(McIntyre)等人的研究报告:"卡哌嗪作为一种维持疗法,用于预防成人双相情感障碍 I 的情绪发作 "1 ,结论是卡哌嗪在预防复发方面并不优于安慰剂。然而,根据我们成功使用卡哌嗪治疗双相情感障碍 I 急性抑郁、躁狂和混合发作的临床经验,我们也发现卡哌嗪在预防复发方面很有帮助。作为一种部分多巴胺激动剂,它对 D3 受体的亲和力是 D2 受体的八倍,D3 受体的亲和力高于内源性多巴胺3 ,因此卡培拉嗪是一种动态药物,找到正确的剂量对于优化疗效和减少副作用至关重要。3 相反,4.5 毫克和 6 毫克等批准剂量较高的药物具有多巴胺拮抗剂的作用,可以在数天内迅速控制躁狂症和精神病。3 毫克的剂量介于两者之间;对于某些抑郁症患者来说,它的多巴胺阻断作用可能过强,但又不足以控制躁狂症和精神病。卡培拉嗪独特的药效学特征使处方者可以根据患者的需要调整精确的剂量:双相抑郁 I 期患者可使用较低剂量;双相躁狂症和混合发作患者可使用较高剂量,作为一种耐受性相对较好的单一疗法,卡培拉嗪有可能实现全方位治疗。3 有时,对于晚期出现的副作用,如失眠,可适当减少剂量。此外,停药 12 周后才能检测不到卡哌嗪的总代谢物,对于 3A4 代谢较差或服用 3A4 抑制剂(如大麻(本研究允许))的患者来说,这段时间甚至更长。对于那些不能耐受每日服药、3 偏爱间歇服药或在服药依从性方面面临挑战的患者来说,这一特点可以实现有效的间歇服药计划。与许多其他抗精神病药物不同,由于卡培拉嗪与乙酰胆碱和组胺的结合亲和力较低,我们通常不会遇到停药效应。3 根据我们的经验,服用卡培拉嗪数月的躁郁症患者在停药后的数月内可能会保持稳定,这是因为卡培拉嗪具有长效作用。3 在这一阶段,导致停药的不良事件(67 例)可能归因于这种激进的用药计划。相反,为什么不允许双相 I 型躁狂症和混合型患者按照 FDA 指南服用 4.5 毫克或 6 毫克?3 在这一阶段,因疗效不佳而停药的比例(35)可能归因于治疗剂量不足。未能达到随机化标准(143 例)也可能反映出缺乏个体化用药。半数以上的开放标签患者在双盲随机化之前停药,这限制了样本对那些服用 3 毫克疗效最好的患者的普适性,这就引出了下一个问题:为什么要把剂量降到 1.5 毫克?更有效的设计应该是根据指数发作情况进行剂量滴定,并在双盲阶段进行调整,以解决复发的早期迹象和/或耐受性问题,口服4 和长效注射阿立哌唑5 的双相 I 型维持治疗研究就是这样设计的。此外,卡哌嗪代谢物的作用时间比口服阿立哌唑的作用时间更长,后者的维持治疗研究时间为 74 周,为什么仅在 39 周后就停止研究呢?卡普兰-梅耶曲线在 36 周时开始出现分叉,包括复发时间和躁狂复发时间,这可能反映了躁狂症所需的卡哌嗪剂量较高,而抑郁症的药效学效应则较低。从现实世界的临床背景来看,这项研究同样可以得出结论:服用 3 毫克卡哌嗪 16 周,可以持久预防双相情感障碍 I 的抑郁、躁狂和混合发作的复发,其效果与剂量减至 1.5 毫克、继续服用 3 毫克或停药 39 周的效果相当,"所有症状和功能的改善均得以维持"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信