{"title":"Resource-rational psychopathology.","authors":"Bilal A Bari, Samuel J Gershman","doi":"10.1037/bne0000600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychopathology is vast and diverse. Across distinct disease states, individuals exhibit symptoms that appear counter to the standard view of rationality (expected utility maximization). We argue that some aspects of psychopathology can be described as resource-rational, reflecting a rational trade-off between reward and cognitive resources. We review work on two theories of this kind: rational inattention, where a capacity limit applies to perceptual channels, and policy compression, where the capacity limit applies to action channels. We show how these theories can parsimoniously explain many forms of psychopathology, including affective, primary psychotic, and neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as many effects of psychoactive medications on these disorders. While there are important disorder-specific differences and the theories are by no means universal, we argue that resource rationality offers a useful new perspective on psychopathology. By emphasizing the role of cognitive resource constraints, this approach offers a more inclusive picture of rationality. Some aspects of psychopathology may reflect rational trade-offs rather than the breakdown of rationality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":8739,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"221-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychopathology is vast and diverse. Across distinct disease states, individuals exhibit symptoms that appear counter to the standard view of rationality (expected utility maximization). We argue that some aspects of psychopathology can be described as resource-rational, reflecting a rational trade-off between reward and cognitive resources. We review work on two theories of this kind: rational inattention, where a capacity limit applies to perceptual channels, and policy compression, where the capacity limit applies to action channels. We show how these theories can parsimoniously explain many forms of psychopathology, including affective, primary psychotic, and neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as many effects of psychoactive medications on these disorders. While there are important disorder-specific differences and the theories are by no means universal, we argue that resource rationality offers a useful new perspective on psychopathology. By emphasizing the role of cognitive resource constraints, this approach offers a more inclusive picture of rationality. Some aspects of psychopathology may reflect rational trade-offs rather than the breakdown of rationality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
精神病理学种类繁多。在各种不同的疾病状态中,个体表现出的症状似乎与标准的理性观点(预期效用最大化)背道而驰。我们认为,精神病理学的某些方面可以被描述为资源理性,反映了报酬与认知资源之间的理性权衡。我们回顾了两种此类理论的研究成果:理性注意力不集中理论和政策压缩理论,前者认为感知通道受到能力限制,而后者则认为行动通道受到能力限制。我们展示了这些理论如何能够合理地解释多种形式的精神病理学,包括情感障碍、原发性精神病和神经发育障碍,以及精神活性药物对这些障碍的许多影响。虽然这些理论与特定疾病存在重大差异,也绝非放之四海而皆准,但我们认为,资源合理性为精神病理学提供了一个有用的新视角。通过强调认知资源限制的作用,这种方法为理性提供了一个更具包容性的图景。精神病理学的某些方面可能反映了理性的权衡,而不是理性的崩溃。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。