Organizational change structures: exploring the organizational conditions for sustainable change in the agro-industry

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Morten Knudsen, Sharon Kishik
{"title":"Organizational change structures: exploring the organizational conditions for sustainable change in the agro-industry","authors":"Morten Knudsen, Sharon Kishik","doi":"10.1108/jocm-04-2023-0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The paper starts from an observation of a discrepancy between the ambitions for sustainable change in the agro-industry and the actual changes being implemented. We offer one possible explanation by investigating the organizational structures conditioning change in this industry.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We apply a case study methodology, focusing on the Danish pig industry and its organizational conditions for change. Based on interviews and document analysis, and building on systems theory, we develop the concept of change structures, understood as decision premises that guide the change of further decision premises.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis suggests that the pig industry’s change structures predominantly enable changes that cut costs and optimize the production, which may conflict with and possibly foreclose the changes needed to realize the industry’s sustainable ambitions. This conflict and its implications are not acknowledged by the industry.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The analysis indicates that the industry may be locked in its current form of organizational change. We suggest a way to overcome the lock-in by fostering organizational mechanisms that enable alternative interpretations to emerge internally. Without this, achieving the required sustainable change in the industry may hinge on stronger external regulation and support.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Conceptually, the notion of change structures supplements actor-oriented analytical approaches that focus on change agents and sense-making. Empirically, we contribute with an analysis of the conditions of possibility for sustainable change in an important yet understudied industry in organization studies; namely, the conventional agro-industry.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-04-2023-0142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The paper starts from an observation of a discrepancy between the ambitions for sustainable change in the agro-industry and the actual changes being implemented. We offer one possible explanation by investigating the organizational structures conditioning change in this industry.

Design/methodology/approach

We apply a case study methodology, focusing on the Danish pig industry and its organizational conditions for change. Based on interviews and document analysis, and building on systems theory, we develop the concept of change structures, understood as decision premises that guide the change of further decision premises.

Findings

The analysis suggests that the pig industry’s change structures predominantly enable changes that cut costs and optimize the production, which may conflict with and possibly foreclose the changes needed to realize the industry’s sustainable ambitions. This conflict and its implications are not acknowledged by the industry.

Practical implications

The analysis indicates that the industry may be locked in its current form of organizational change. We suggest a way to overcome the lock-in by fostering organizational mechanisms that enable alternative interpretations to emerge internally. Without this, achieving the required sustainable change in the industry may hinge on stronger external regulation and support.

Originality/value

Conceptually, the notion of change structures supplements actor-oriented analytical approaches that focus on change agents and sense-making. Empirically, we contribute with an analysis of the conditions of possibility for sustainable change in an important yet understudied industry in organization studies; namely, the conventional agro-industry.

组织变革结构:探索农业产业可持续变革的组织条件
目的本文从农业产业可持续变革的雄心壮志与正在实施的实际变革之间的差异出发。我们采用案例研究方法,重点关注丹麦养猪业及其变革的组织条件。基于访谈和文件分析,并以系统理论为基础,我们提出了变革结构的概念,将其理解为指导进一步变革的决策前提。实际意义分析表明,该行业可能被当前的组织变革形式所束缚。我们提出了一种克服这种束缚的方法,即促进组织机制的发展,使内部能够出现不同的解释。原创性/价值从概念上讲,变革结构的概念补充了以行动者为导向的分析方法,这些方法侧重于变革推动者和感性认识的形成。从经验上讲,我们分析了组织研究中一个重要但未得到充分研究的行业(即传统农业产业)实现可持续变革的可能性条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: ■Adapting strategic planning to the need for change ■Leadership research ■Responsibility for change implementation and follow-through ■The psychology of change and its effect on the workforce ■TQM - will it work in your organization? Successful organizations respond intelligently to factors which precipitate change. Economic climates, political trends, changes in consumer demands, management policy or structure, employment levels and financial resources - all these elements are constantly at play to ensure that organizations clinging on to static structures will ultimately lose out. But change is a dynamic and alarming thing - this journal addresses how to manage it positively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信