The American Robot: A Cultural History by Dustin A. Abnet (review)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Ben Russell
{"title":"The American Robot: A Cultural History by Dustin A. Abnet (review)","authors":"Ben Russell","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a926339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The American Robot: A Cultural History</em> by Dustin A. Abnet <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ben Russell (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The American Robot: A Cultural History</em> By Dustin A. Abnet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020. Pp. 376. <p>This wide-ranging and thought-provoking book is about the <em>idea</em> of the robot in American history. The robot is presented not as a technical creation but as \"a multifaceted character that people use to deal with some of the most persistent tensions in their society\" (p. 295). Taking the robot as a central interpretative lens, the book identifies \"a persistent ideological determination\" to connect and conflate machines and humans, \"sometimes the self, but more frequently others\" (p. 295). The book argues this ideology has been created by American elites—primarily a small subset of American middle- and upper-class men—who, while \"unwilling <strong>[End Page 712]</strong> to acknowledge that they themselves might be machines, have been willing to accept that others might or should be\" (p. 7). In consequence, humans have been turned into machines and machines into humans, with all the quandaries pertaining to race, gender, and social status that such a transformation entails.</p> <p>The author acknowledges the extant literature, sharing with it an approach taking the robot as a mirror for humans to reflect upon themselves with—see, for example, Jessica Riskin's <em>The Restless Clock</em> (2016). The book quickly defines a dual focus, on America and on presenting a narrative right up to 2019. This stands well alongside works that have been written with a European focus and those that are often necessarily historical case studies—take Adelheid Voskuhl's <em>Androids in the Enlightenment</em> (2013) for the former, for example, and E. R. Truitt's <em>Medieval Robots</em> (2015) for the latter. That said, note that European museums have adopted the book's long historical view in robots exhibits as standard (Technisches Museum, Vienna, 2013; Musée des Arts et Métiers, Paris, 2014; Science Museum, London, 2017; and MUDEC, Milan, 2020)—and that there is a caveat to how the book adopts this approach in the following discussion.</p> <p>The book is split into three parts. \"God and Demon, 1790–1910\" addresses the rise of automaton figures such as Signor Falconi's Indian (1788) or Zadoc Drederick's Steam Man (1868), within the context of American society's nineteenth-century industrial transformation. The second, \"Masters and Slaves, 1910–1945,\" sees Karel Capek's newly coined word \"robot\" applied in an America being transformed into the world's preeminent power. The third, \"Playfellow and Protector, 1945–2019,\" addresses the robot's rise as a creation of popular culture within an America that had huge prosperity but was grappling with the dilemmas of the Cold War. Each section is prefaced with a short case study introducing the key themes to be discussed. This careful structuring is repeated for each individual chapter, providing clear framing for the detailed source material and discussion contained therein.</p> <p>The book speaks to the three characteristics that make robots such intriguing subjects. First, they are <em>liminal</em>, existing at contested points on numerous spectrums between paired extremes: at the top level as identified by the author, intimate/distant, god/demon, master/slave, playfellow/protector. The body text identifies, or brings to mind, a wide range of other such pairings. Secondly, robots are <em>situated</em>: they exist not just in the laboratory but in the unpredictable and infinitely variable human world, and in many different media types, from films and plays to comics and cartoons. The book takes this rich media as its feedstock throughout, outlined and interrogated in detail. Finally, robots are <em>embodied</em>: they take different physical forms, which influence how the robot interacts with and shapes the human environment in which it resides.</p> <p>The overall argument pertaining to robots' liminality and situatedness is well made. The nature of robots' embodiment could have been explored a <strong>[End Page 713]</strong> little more. The book's source material includes robots in considerable numbers and taking many different physical forms, from chess-playing automata and electromechanical men to industrial robots by Unimation, and even Cyrus McCormick's reaper. The absence of robots as embodied software, or electronic devices, was quite surprising. Maybe these technologies are not as...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by:

  • The American Robot: A Cultural History by Dustin A. Abnet
  • Ben Russell (bio)
The American Robot: A Cultural History By Dustin A. Abnet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020. Pp. 376.

This wide-ranging and thought-provoking book is about the idea of the robot in American history. The robot is presented not as a technical creation but as "a multifaceted character that people use to deal with some of the most persistent tensions in their society" (p. 295). Taking the robot as a central interpretative lens, the book identifies "a persistent ideological determination" to connect and conflate machines and humans, "sometimes the self, but more frequently others" (p. 295). The book argues this ideology has been created by American elites—primarily a small subset of American middle- and upper-class men—who, while "unwilling [End Page 712] to acknowledge that they themselves might be machines, have been willing to accept that others might or should be" (p. 7). In consequence, humans have been turned into machines and machines into humans, with all the quandaries pertaining to race, gender, and social status that such a transformation entails.

The author acknowledges the extant literature, sharing with it an approach taking the robot as a mirror for humans to reflect upon themselves with—see, for example, Jessica Riskin's The Restless Clock (2016). The book quickly defines a dual focus, on America and on presenting a narrative right up to 2019. This stands well alongside works that have been written with a European focus and those that are often necessarily historical case studies—take Adelheid Voskuhl's Androids in the Enlightenment (2013) for the former, for example, and E. R. Truitt's Medieval Robots (2015) for the latter. That said, note that European museums have adopted the book's long historical view in robots exhibits as standard (Technisches Museum, Vienna, 2013; Musée des Arts et Métiers, Paris, 2014; Science Museum, London, 2017; and MUDEC, Milan, 2020)—and that there is a caveat to how the book adopts this approach in the following discussion.

The book is split into three parts. "God and Demon, 1790–1910" addresses the rise of automaton figures such as Signor Falconi's Indian (1788) or Zadoc Drederick's Steam Man (1868), within the context of American society's nineteenth-century industrial transformation. The second, "Masters and Slaves, 1910–1945," sees Karel Capek's newly coined word "robot" applied in an America being transformed into the world's preeminent power. The third, "Playfellow and Protector, 1945–2019," addresses the robot's rise as a creation of popular culture within an America that had huge prosperity but was grappling with the dilemmas of the Cold War. Each section is prefaced with a short case study introducing the key themes to be discussed. This careful structuring is repeated for each individual chapter, providing clear framing for the detailed source material and discussion contained therein.

The book speaks to the three characteristics that make robots such intriguing subjects. First, they are liminal, existing at contested points on numerous spectrums between paired extremes: at the top level as identified by the author, intimate/distant, god/demon, master/slave, playfellow/protector. The body text identifies, or brings to mind, a wide range of other such pairings. Secondly, robots are situated: they exist not just in the laboratory but in the unpredictable and infinitely variable human world, and in many different media types, from films and plays to comics and cartoons. The book takes this rich media as its feedstock throughout, outlined and interrogated in detail. Finally, robots are embodied: they take different physical forms, which influence how the robot interacts with and shapes the human environment in which it resides.

The overall argument pertaining to robots' liminality and situatedness is well made. The nature of robots' embodiment could have been explored a [End Page 713] little more. The book's source material includes robots in considerable numbers and taking many different physical forms, from chess-playing automata and electromechanical men to industrial robots by Unimation, and even Cyrus McCormick's reaper. The absence of robots as embodied software, or electronic devices, was quite surprising. Maybe these technologies are not as...

美国机器人:Dustin A. Abnet 著的《美国机器人:文化史》(评论)
评论者: 美国机器人:Dustin A. Abnet 著 Ben Russell 译 The American Robot:Dustin A. Abnet 著。芝加哥:芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2020 年。Pp.376.本书内容广泛,发人深省,讲述了美国历史上的机器人概念。机器人不是一种技术创造,而是 "人们用来处理社会中一些最顽固的紧张关系的多面角色"(第 295 页)。本书以机器人为核心解释视角,指出 "一种持久的意识形态决心 "将机器和人类联系起来并混为一谈,"有时是自我,但更多时候是他人"(第 295 页)。该书认为,这种意识形态是由美国精英--主要是一小部分美国中产阶级和上层阶级的男性--所创造的,他们虽然 "不愿[完712页]承认自己可能是机器,但却愿意接受他人可能或应该是机器的事实"(第7页)。结果,人类变成了机器,机器变成了人类,这种转变带来了种族、性别和社会地位方面的种种窘境。作者对现有文献表示认可,并分享了一种将机器人作为人类反思自身的镜子的方法--例如,参见杰西卡-里斯金(Jessica Riskin)的《不安分的时钟》(The Restless Clock,2016 年)。该书很快就确定了一个双重重点,即关注美国,并将叙事一直延续到 2019 年。这一点与那些以欧洲为重点的作品以及那些通常必然是历史案例研究的作品并驾齐驱--前者如阿德尔海德-沃斯库尔(Adelheid Voskuhl)的《启蒙运动中的机器人》(2013),后者如E-R-特鲁伊特(E. R. Truitt)的《中世纪机器人》(2015)。尽管如此,请注意,欧洲博物馆已将本书的长历史视角作为机器人展品的标准(维也纳技术博物馆,2013 年;巴黎艺术与工艺博物馆,2014 年;伦敦科学博物馆,2017 年;米兰 MUDEC,2020 年)--在下文的讨论中,对本书如何采用这种方法有一个说明。本书分为三个部分。第一部分 "神与魔,1790-1910 年 "在美国社会十九世纪工业转型的背景下,探讨了诸如法尔科尼(Signor Falconi)的《印第安人》(1788 年)或扎多克-德雷德里克(Zadoc Drederick)的《蒸汽人》(1868 年)等自动机形象的兴起。第二部 "主人与奴隶,1910-1945 "将卡雷尔-卡佩克(Karel Capek)新创造的 "机器人 "一词应用于正在转变为世界卓越强国的美国。第三部分 "玩伴与保护者,1945-2019 年 "探讨了机器人作为流行文化的创造物在美国的崛起,当时的美国虽然非常繁荣,但也面临着冷战的困境。每一部分前都有一个简短的案例研究,介绍将要讨论的关键主题。每一章都重复了这种精心设计的结构,为其中包含的详细原始资料和讨论提供了清晰的框架。本书论述了使机器人成为如此引人入胜的主题的三个特点。首先,它们是边缘性的,存在于成双成对的极端之间的众多光谱上的有争议点上:在作者确定的最高层次上,它们是亲密的/遥远的、神/恶魔、主人/奴隶、玩伴/保护者。正文中还指出或引出了一系列其他此类配对。其次,机器人是有场景的:它们不仅存在于实验室中,还存在于变幻莫测、变化无穷的人类世界中,存在于从电影和戏剧到漫画和卡通等多种不同类型的媒体中。本书自始至终以这些丰富的媒体为素材,对其进行了详细的概述和探讨。最后,机器人是具身的:它们具有不同的物理形态,这些形态会影响机器人与人类环境的互动,并塑造机器人所处的人类环境。关于机器人的边缘性和处境性的总体论点是正确的。对机器人体现的本质还可以再多探讨一些 [尾页 713]。本书的原始资料包括数量可观、物理形态各异的机器人,从下棋的自动装置和机电人到 Unimation 的工业机器人,甚至还有赛勒斯-麦考密克的收割机。令人惊讶的是,这些机器人中并没有软件或电子设备。也许这些技术并不像...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信