Interrogating the agency of non-profit labour market intermediaries: Casting light on ‘shadow spaces’ through an institutional-relational view

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Norma M Rantisi, Mostafa Henaway, Deborah Leslie
{"title":"Interrogating the agency of non-profit labour market intermediaries: Casting light on ‘shadow spaces’ through an institutional-relational view","authors":"Norma M Rantisi, Mostafa Henaway, Deborah Leslie","doi":"10.1177/23996544241253706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a context of government cutbacks, non-profit labour-market intermediaries are assuming a more significant role in efforts to combat precarious employment. Yet such organizations are still subject to state funding regimes, regulations, oversight and neoliberal logics. As such, some scholars argue that they constitute “shadow state” spaces. In this paper, we move beyond the ‘shadow’ concept, casting light on the ways that different state-non-profit relations shape non-profits’ agency to define and realize their respective mandates. Building on a relational perspective, we hold that links between non-profits and the state are not linear. We complement this perspective with an institutional-relational approach to consider how a non-profit’s distinct institutional configuration (i.e., regulations, funders, and partners) enables or forecloses agency vis-à-vis the state apparatus. Through an examination of two non-profit labour market intermediaries that serve immigrant workers in Montreal/Tio’tia:ke, our analysis lends insight into institutional elements that can enlarge a non-profit organization’s space to maneuver.","PeriodicalId":48108,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241253706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a context of government cutbacks, non-profit labour-market intermediaries are assuming a more significant role in efforts to combat precarious employment. Yet such organizations are still subject to state funding regimes, regulations, oversight and neoliberal logics. As such, some scholars argue that they constitute “shadow state” spaces. In this paper, we move beyond the ‘shadow’ concept, casting light on the ways that different state-non-profit relations shape non-profits’ agency to define and realize their respective mandates. Building on a relational perspective, we hold that links between non-profits and the state are not linear. We complement this perspective with an institutional-relational approach to consider how a non-profit’s distinct institutional configuration (i.e., regulations, funders, and partners) enables or forecloses agency vis-à-vis the state apparatus. Through an examination of two non-profit labour market intermediaries that serve immigrant workers in Montreal/Tio’tia:ke, our analysis lends insight into institutional elements that can enlarge a non-profit organization’s space to maneuver.
探讨非营利性劳动力市场中介机构的作用:通过机构关系视角揭示 "影子空间
在政府削减开支的背景下,非营利性劳动力市场中介机构在打击不稳定就业的努力中发挥着更加重要的作用。然而,这些组织仍然受到国家资助制度、法规、监督和新自由主义逻辑的制约。因此,一些学者认为它们构成了 "影子国家 "空间。在本文中,我们将超越 "影子 "的概念,揭示不同的国家-非营利组织关系如何影响非营利组织界定和实现各自使命的能力。基于关系视角,我们认为非营利组织与国家之间的联系不是线性的。我们从制度-关系的角度对这一观点进行了补充,以考虑非营利组织独特的制度结构(即法规、资助者和合作伙伴)如何使其在国家机器面前发挥或丧失作用。通过对蒙特利尔/Tio'tia:ke 两家为移民工人提供服务的非营利性劳动力市场中介机构的研究,我们的分析有助于深入了解能够扩大非营利性组织活动空间的制度要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信