Pathways and Environmental Impacts of Methane Migration: Case Studies in the Marcellus Shale, USA

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geofluids Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1155/2024/9290873
Patrick A. Hammond, Tao Wen, Josh Woda, David Oakley
{"title":"Pathways and Environmental Impacts of Methane Migration: Case Studies in the Marcellus Shale, USA","authors":"Patrick A. Hammond,&nbsp;Tao Wen,&nbsp;Josh Woda,&nbsp;David Oakley","doi":"10.1155/2024/9290873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gas migration incidents, particularly stream contamination cases, have been rarely investigated and gone through the peer review process, with the exception of three sites in northeast Pennsylvania (Dimock and two Sugar Runs in Lycoming and Bradford counties, respectively) where air emission surveys, dissolved methane measurements, and structural (hydro)geologic interpretations have been used to demonstrate potential environmental impacts due to shale gas operations. In addition to reviewing previously published work from these three sites, we report and analyze unpublished new data trying to determine if a direct relationship between methane migration, stream contamination, and air emissions exists at those sites. Our analysis indicates that subsurface methane migration, stream methane contamination, and air emissions might not be all present or detectable at a faulty/leaky shale gas well. Which of these signs of contamination, if any, exist is largely controlled by the local (hydro)geologic conditions. In each case, the most likely migration pathway was from gas charged zones up well annular spaces to confined permeable formations, then laterally to a direct discharge or by vertically controlled joints to streams, water wells, and the atmosphere. The confining units act as barriers to the buoyant movement of stray gases, allowing subsurface travel of gas for 1–4 km from a leaky gas well. The knowledge we learn from these three sites can guide the future investigations of methane contamination cases in other regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12512,"journal":{"name":"Geofluids","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofluids","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9290873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gas migration incidents, particularly stream contamination cases, have been rarely investigated and gone through the peer review process, with the exception of three sites in northeast Pennsylvania (Dimock and two Sugar Runs in Lycoming and Bradford counties, respectively) where air emission surveys, dissolved methane measurements, and structural (hydro)geologic interpretations have been used to demonstrate potential environmental impacts due to shale gas operations. In addition to reviewing previously published work from these three sites, we report and analyze unpublished new data trying to determine if a direct relationship between methane migration, stream contamination, and air emissions exists at those sites. Our analysis indicates that subsurface methane migration, stream methane contamination, and air emissions might not be all present or detectable at a faulty/leaky shale gas well. Which of these signs of contamination, if any, exist is largely controlled by the local (hydro)geologic conditions. In each case, the most likely migration pathway was from gas charged zones up well annular spaces to confined permeable formations, then laterally to a direct discharge or by vertically controlled joints to streams, water wells, and the atmosphere. The confining units act as barriers to the buoyant movement of stray gases, allowing subsurface travel of gas for 1–4 km from a leaky gas well. The knowledge we learn from these three sites can guide the future investigations of methane contamination cases in other regions.

甲烷迁移的途径和环境影响:美国马塞勒斯页岩案例研究
除了宾夕法尼亚州东北部的三个地点(分别位于莱康明县和布拉德福德县的 Dimock 和两个 Sugar Runs)外,天然气迁移事件(尤其是溪流污染案例)很少被调查并通过同行评审程序,在这三个地点,空气排放调查、溶解甲烷测量和结构(水文)地质解释被用来证明页岩气作业可能对环境造成的影响。除了回顾这三个地点以前发表的研究成果外,我们还报告并分析了未发表的新数据,试图确定这些地点的甲烷迁移、溪流污染和空气排放之间是否存在直接关系。我们的分析表明,地表下的甲烷迁移、溪流甲烷污染和空气排放在有问题/泄漏的页岩气井中可能并不都存在或可以检测到。这些污染迹象(如果有的话)的存在主要受当地(水文)地质条件的控制。在每种情况下,最有可能的迁移途径是从带气区沿油井环形空间向封闭的渗透地层迁移,然后横向直接排放或通过垂直控制的接缝向溪流、水井和大气排放。致密地层是杂散气体浮力运动的障碍,允许气体从泄漏气井向地下移动 1-4 公里。我们从这三个地点学到的知识可以指导今后对其他地区甲烷污染案例的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geofluids
Geofluids 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.60%
发文量
835
期刊介绍: Geofluids is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for original research and reviews relating to the role of fluids in mineralogical, chemical, and structural evolution of the Earth’s crust. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of sub-disciplines in which Geofluids research is carried out. To this end, authors are encouraged to stress the transdisciplinary relevance and international ramifications of their research. Authors are also encouraged to make their work as accessible as possible to readers from other sub-disciplines. Geofluids emphasizes chemical, microbial, and physical aspects of subsurface fluids throughout the Earth’s crust. Geofluids spans studies of groundwater, terrestrial or submarine geothermal fluids, basinal brines, petroleum, metamorphic waters or magmatic fluids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信