Comparative Analysis of Four Methods for Accurate Estimation of Soil Phosphorus Storage Capacity: a Case Study in a Typical Red Soil

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE
Huan Li, Jiamin Zhang, Yanling Wang
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Four Methods for Accurate Estimation of Soil Phosphorus Storage Capacity: a Case Study in a Typical Red Soil","authors":"Huan Li, Jiamin Zhang, Yanling Wang","doi":"10.1134/s1064229323603402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Efficient utilization of agricultural soil phosphorus (P) and mitigation of loss risks necessitate a precise evaluation of soil P storage capacity (SPSC). This study compared the effectiveness of four soil test P methods (Oxalate, Bray, Olsen, and Mehlich-1) to accurately estimate SPSC and simplify P loss risk assessment of soils located in a typical red soil in the Sunjia Watershed, Yingtan, Jiangxi Province, China. The extraction efficiencies of these methods for Fe, Al, P, and P saturation ratio (PSR) were compared, and conversion equations between SPSC<sub>Ox</sub> (extracted using Oxalate) and soil test P (Bray, Olsen, and Mehlich-1) were derived through fitting analysis. The results underscored Oxalate as the optimal extractant for gauging P loss risk in red soils. Structural equation modeling (SEM) unveiled the substantial impact of amorphous iron-aluminum oxides (Fe<sub>o</sub>, Al<sub>o</sub>) on SPSC, with Fe<sub>o</sub> exerting a more pronounced influence than Al<sub>o</sub>. Among soil physicochemical properties, total carbon emerged as the most influential, and a strong interaction was noted between the physicochemical properties and Fe<sub>o</sub> and Al<sub>o</sub>. The study delineated three crucial P concentration ranges for practical P management in red soils. When Bray-P &lt; 48.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>, the soil acted as a P sink with no P loss risk, allowing for continued P application to augment crop yield. Conversely, within 48.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> &lt; Bray-P ≤ 55.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>, the soil attained its maximum secure P capacity; further P application significantly escalated the peril of P loss. Subsequently, when Bray-P &gt; 55.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>, the soil turns into a source of P release. This signifies an escalated risk of P loss, demanding the immediate implementation of environmental protective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11892,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Soil Science","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229323603402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient utilization of agricultural soil phosphorus (P) and mitigation of loss risks necessitate a precise evaluation of soil P storage capacity (SPSC). This study compared the effectiveness of four soil test P methods (Oxalate, Bray, Olsen, and Mehlich-1) to accurately estimate SPSC and simplify P loss risk assessment of soils located in a typical red soil in the Sunjia Watershed, Yingtan, Jiangxi Province, China. The extraction efficiencies of these methods for Fe, Al, P, and P saturation ratio (PSR) were compared, and conversion equations between SPSCOx (extracted using Oxalate) and soil test P (Bray, Olsen, and Mehlich-1) were derived through fitting analysis. The results underscored Oxalate as the optimal extractant for gauging P loss risk in red soils. Structural equation modeling (SEM) unveiled the substantial impact of amorphous iron-aluminum oxides (Feo, Alo) on SPSC, with Feo exerting a more pronounced influence than Alo. Among soil physicochemical properties, total carbon emerged as the most influential, and a strong interaction was noted between the physicochemical properties and Feo and Alo. The study delineated three crucial P concentration ranges for practical P management in red soils. When Bray-P < 48.2 mg kg–1, the soil acted as a P sink with no P loss risk, allowing for continued P application to augment crop yield. Conversely, within 48.2 mg kg–1 < Bray-P ≤ 55.2 mg kg–1, the soil attained its maximum secure P capacity; further P application significantly escalated the peril of P loss. Subsequently, when Bray-P > 55.2 mg kg–1, the soil turns into a source of P release. This signifies an escalated risk of P loss, demanding the immediate implementation of environmental protective measures.

Abstract Image

准确估算土壤蓄磷能力的四种方法对比分析:典型红壤案例研究
摘要 农业土壤磷(P)的有效利用和降低损失风险需要对土壤磷储存能力(SPSC)进行精确评估。本研究比较了四种土壤磷测试方法(Oxalate、Bray、Olsen 和 Mehlich-1)的有效性,以准确估算 SPSC 并简化中国江西省鹰潭市孙家流域典型红壤的磷流失风险评估。比较了这些方法对铁、铝、钾和钾饱和度(PSR)的提取效率,并通过拟合分析得出了 SPSCOx(使用草酸盐提取)和土壤测试钾(Bray、Olsen 和 Mehlich-1)之间的转换方程。结果表明,草酸盐是衡量红壤中钾流失风险的最佳萃取剂。结构方程模型(SEM)揭示了无定形铁铝氧化物(Feo、Alo)对 SPSC 的重大影响,其中 Feo 的影响比 Alo 更明显。在土壤理化性质中,总碳的影响最大,理化性质与 Feo 和 Alo 之间存在强烈的相互作用。该研究为红壤中的实际磷管理划定了三个关键的磷浓度范围。当 Bray-P < 48.2 mg kg-1 时,土壤就像一个钾汇,没有钾流失的风险,可以继续施用钾以提高作物产量。相反,在 48.2 毫克/千克-1 < Bray-P ≤ 55.2 毫克/千克-1范围内,土壤达到了最大的安全钾容量;继续施用钾会大大增加钾流失的风险。随后,当 Bray-P > 55.2 mg kg-1 时,土壤变成了钾释放源。这意味着钾流失的风险增加,需要立即采取环境保护措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurasian Soil Science
Eurasian Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurasian Soil Science publishes original research papers on global and regional studies discussing both theoretical and experimental problems of genesis, geography, physics, chemistry, biology, fertility, management, conservation, and remediation of soils. Special sections are devoted to current news in the life of the International and Russian soil science societies and to the history of soil sciences. Since 2000, the journal Agricultural Chemistry, the English version of the journal of the Russian Academy of Sciences Agrokhimiya, has been merged into the journal Eurasian Soil Science and is no longer published as a separate title.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信