{"title":"The Relationship between rio s and the UN in Matters of Peace and Security: It’s Complicated","authors":"Kirsten Schmalenbach","doi":"10.1163/15723747-21010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Employing the example of <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ecowas</span>’ reaction to the military coup in Niger, this article offers a fresh appraisal of the relationship between <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio </span>s and the UN within the universal collective security system which is – once again – largely paralysed by geopolitics. Departing from an analysis of the channels available to <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio </span>s to engage with the UN in a rapidly unfolding regional crisis, this paper argues that the UN primarily perceives <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio </span>s as mediators and peace facilitators. This is driven by <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio </span>s’ often advantageous position due to their knowledge of local dynamics and their particularly strong interest in securing peace in their own neighbourhoods. However, UN-<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio</span> cooperation in peacekeeping is not without tension and <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio </span>s’ use of military force without the targeted State’s consent or <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">sc</span> authorisation is seemingly at odds with the UN Charter. However, the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">unsc</span>’s ambiguous practice regarding Chapter-<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">viii</span> authorisations may allow future developments involving <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">rio </span>s without opening the door to their full autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-21010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Employing the example of ecowas’ reaction to the military coup in Niger, this article offers a fresh appraisal of the relationship between rio s and the UN within the universal collective security system which is – once again – largely paralysed by geopolitics. Departing from an analysis of the channels available to rio s to engage with the UN in a rapidly unfolding regional crisis, this paper argues that the UN primarily perceives rio s as mediators and peace facilitators. This is driven by rio s’ often advantageous position due to their knowledge of local dynamics and their particularly strong interest in securing peace in their own neighbourhoods. However, UN-rio cooperation in peacekeeping is not without tension and rio s’ use of military force without the targeted State’s consent or sc authorisation is seemingly at odds with the UN Charter. However, the unsc’s ambiguous practice regarding Chapter-viii authorisations may allow future developments involving rio s without opening the door to their full autonomy.
本文以西非国家经济共同体(ecowas)对尼日尔军事政变的反应为例,对国际联盟与联合国在普遍集体安全体系中的关系进行了新的评估,而这一体系在很大程度上又一次被地缘政治所瘫痪。本文从对里约集团在迅速发展的地区危机中与联合国接触的渠道的分析出发,认为联合国主要将里约集团视为调解人与和平促进者。这是因为里约组织了解当地的动态,对确保自己社区的和平有着特别强烈的兴趣,因而往往处于有利地位。然而,联合国与里约在维和方面的合作并非没有矛盾,里约在未经目标国同意或授权的情况下使用军事力量似乎与《联合国宪章》相抵触。然而,联合国安理会在第 VIII 章授权方面的模棱两可的做法可能会在不为里 奥完全自治敞开大门的情况下允许涉及里奥的未来发展。
期刊介绍:
After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.