{"title":"The perceived object in media-based empathy: applying Edith Stein’s concept of Wortleib","authors":"Minna-Kerttu Kekki","doi":"10.1007/s11007-024-09633-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The question of how other consciousnesses appear via media has forced us to re-think the classical phenomenological accounts of sociality. However, as the phenomenological account of empathy is very much centred around the perception of the other’s living body, it has faced challenges in discussing the empathic experience in media-based contexts, where we cannot perceive the other’s body, but something else, such as a screen or a text. In this article, I provide the concept for describing the perceived object in media-based empathy: a living textual body, based on Edith Stein’s concept of <i>Wortleib</i> (a living word body) referring to words as “living,” as bearers of meaning in her early work <i>On the Problem of Empathy</i> [<i>Zum Problem der Einfühlung</i>]. I divide the term <i>Wortleib</i> in two different cases—the empathic and non-empathic object—and thereby argue that, while the object of media-based empathic experience cannot be the other’s body, it is an empathic <i>Wortleib</i>, a communicative empathic object. While Stein herself discussed media-based empathy merely in paper media, I demonstrate the unique usefulness of these concepts in analysing any media-based communication and thus the timeliness of her work in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":45310,"journal":{"name":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-024-09633-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The question of how other consciousnesses appear via media has forced us to re-think the classical phenomenological accounts of sociality. However, as the phenomenological account of empathy is very much centred around the perception of the other’s living body, it has faced challenges in discussing the empathic experience in media-based contexts, where we cannot perceive the other’s body, but something else, such as a screen or a text. In this article, I provide the concept for describing the perceived object in media-based empathy: a living textual body, based on Edith Stein’s concept of Wortleib (a living word body) referring to words as “living,” as bearers of meaning in her early work On the Problem of Empathy [Zum Problem der Einfühlung]. I divide the term Wortleib in two different cases—the empathic and non-empathic object—and thereby argue that, while the object of media-based empathic experience cannot be the other’s body, it is an empathic Wortleib, a communicative empathic object. While Stein herself discussed media-based empathy merely in paper media, I demonstrate the unique usefulness of these concepts in analysing any media-based communication and thus the timeliness of her work in this respect.
其他意识如何通过媒体出现的问题迫使我们重新思考社会性的经典现象学论述。然而,由于现象学的移情理论在很大程度上是围绕着对他人活生生的身体的感知展开的,因此在讨论基于媒体的语境中的移情体验时面临着挑战,因为在这种语境中,我们无法感知他人的身体,只能感知其他东西,比如屏幕或文本。在本文中,我根据伊迪丝-斯坦因(Edith Stein)在其早期著作《共鸣问题》(On the Problem of Empathy [Zum Problem der Einfühlung])中提出的 "活的文字体"(Wortleib,a living word body)概念,提出了描述媒体共鸣中被感知对象的概念:活的文字体。我将 "Wortleib "一词分为两种不同的情况--移情对象和非移情对象--并由此论证,虽然基于媒体的移情体验的对象不可能是他人的身体,但它却是一个移情的 "Wortleib",一个交流性的移情对象。虽然斯坦因本人仅在纸质媒体中讨论了基于媒体的移情,但我证明了这些概念在分析任何基于媒体的传播时的独特作用,因此她在这方面的研究具有时效性。
期刊介绍:
The central purpose of Continental Philosophy Review is to foster a living dialogue within the international community on philosophical issues of mutual interest. It seeks to elicit, discussions of fundamental philosophical problems and original approaches to them. Broadly encompassing in its focus, the journal invites essays on both expressly theoretical topics and topics dealing with practical problems that extend to the wider domain of socio-political life. It encourages explorations in the domains of art, morality, science and religion as they relate to specific philosophical concerns. Although not an advocate of any one trend or school in philosophy, the journal is especially committed to keeping abreast of developments within phenomenology and contemporary continental philosophy and is interested in investigations that probe possible points of intersection between the continental European and the Anglo-American traditions. Continental Philosophy Review contains review articles of recent, original works in philosophy. It provides considerable space for such reviews, allowing critics to develop their comments and assessments at some length.