Properties of Gluten Foam Composites Containing Different Fibers and Particulates

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Bor-Sen Chiou, Trung Cao, Zach McCaffrey, Cristina Bilbao-Sainz, Delilah Wood, Greg Glenn, William Orts
{"title":"Properties of Gluten Foam Composites Containing Different Fibers and Particulates","authors":"Bor-Sen Chiou,&nbsp;Trung Cao,&nbsp;Zach McCaffrey,&nbsp;Cristina Bilbao-Sainz,&nbsp;Delilah Wood,&nbsp;Greg Glenn,&nbsp;William Orts","doi":"10.1007/s10924-024-03295-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gluten-based foam composites containing various additives were produced to develop materials derived from mostly renewable resources. The fillers included walnut shells, torrefied walnut shells, paraffin wax, milkweed fibers, hemp fibers, and cotton fibers. The effects of the fillers on the foam composites’ properties were determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, compression testing, and water uptake measurements. SEM results showed that most of the fillers were well dispersed in the gluten matrix except for the cotton fibers, which produced agglomerated fiber bundles. FTIR results indicated that foams had a more aggregated structure with higher β-sheet contents than gluten powder. In general, foam composites containing fibers had larger compressive modulus values than those containing particulates. The sample containing 10 wt% milkweed fibers had the highest value of 67.03 ± 12.01 MPa. Also, composites containing torrefied walnut shells had higher compressive strength values than those containing raw walnut shells, indicating better compatibility with the gluten matrix. Moreover, the water uptake values of the foam composites varied from 110 to 270%, with the samples containing milkweed fibers having the largest values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Polymers and the Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Polymers and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10924-024-03295-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gluten-based foam composites containing various additives were produced to develop materials derived from mostly renewable resources. The fillers included walnut shells, torrefied walnut shells, paraffin wax, milkweed fibers, hemp fibers, and cotton fibers. The effects of the fillers on the foam composites’ properties were determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, compression testing, and water uptake measurements. SEM results showed that most of the fillers were well dispersed in the gluten matrix except for the cotton fibers, which produced agglomerated fiber bundles. FTIR results indicated that foams had a more aggregated structure with higher β-sheet contents than gluten powder. In general, foam composites containing fibers had larger compressive modulus values than those containing particulates. The sample containing 10 wt% milkweed fibers had the highest value of 67.03 ± 12.01 MPa. Also, composites containing torrefied walnut shells had higher compressive strength values than those containing raw walnut shells, indicating better compatibility with the gluten matrix. Moreover, the water uptake values of the foam composites varied from 110 to 270%, with the samples containing milkweed fibers having the largest values.

Abstract Image

含有不同纤维和微粒的谷蛋白泡沫复合材料的性能
我们生产了含有各种添加剂的麸质泡沫复合材料,以开发主要来自可再生资源的材料。填充物包括核桃壳、焦化核桃壳、石蜡、乳草纤维、麻纤维和棉纤维。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、热重分析、压缩测试和吸水率测量等方法测定了填料对泡沫复合材料性能的影响。扫描电镜结果表明,除棉纤维产生团聚纤维束外,大多数填料都很好地分散在麸质基质中。傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)结果表明,与麸质粉末相比,泡沫具有更高的β片含量和更聚集的结构。一般来说,含有纤维的泡沫复合材料比含有微粒的泡沫复合材料具有更大的压缩模量值。含 10 wt% 乳草纤维的样品的压缩模量值最高,为 67.03 ± 12.01 兆帕。此外,与含有未加工核桃壳的复合材料相比,含有焦化核桃壳的复合材料具有更高的抗压强度值,这表明其与麸质基体具有更好的兼容性。此外,泡沫复合材料的吸水率从 110% 到 270% 不等,其中含有乳草纤维的样品吸水率最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Polymers and the Environment
Journal of Polymers and the Environment 工程技术-高分子科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Polymers and the Environment fills the need for an international forum in this diverse and rapidly expanding field. The journal serves a crucial role for the publication of information from a wide range of disciplines and is a central outlet for the publication of high-quality peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and short communications. The journal is intentionally interdisciplinary in regard to contributions and covers the following subjects - polymers, environmentally degradable polymers, and degradation pathways: biological, photochemical, oxidative and hydrolytic; new environmental materials: derived by chemical and biosynthetic routes; environmental blends and composites; developments in processing and reactive processing of environmental polymers; characterization of environmental materials: mechanical, physical, thermal, rheological, morphological, and others; recyclable polymers and plastics recycling environmental testing: in-laboratory simulations, outdoor exposures, and standardization of methodologies; environmental fate: end products and intermediates of biodegradation; microbiology and enzymology of polymer biodegradation; solid-waste management and public legislation specific to environmental polymers; and other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信