{"title":"On the failure of Ornstein theory in the finitary category","authors":"Uri Gabor","doi":"10.1090/tran/8776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We show the invalidity of finitary counterparts for three classification theorems: The preservation of being a Bernoulli shift through factors, Sinai’s factor theorem, and the weak Pinsker property. We construct a finitary factor of an i.i.d. process which is not finitarily isomorphic to an i.i.d. process, showing that being finitarily Bernoulli is not preserved through finitary factors. This refutes a conjecture of M. Smorodinsky [<italic>Finitary isomorphism of <inline-formula content-type=\"math/mathml\"> <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" alttext=\"m\"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding=\"application/x-tex\">m</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-dependent processes</italic>, Amer. Math. Soc., Birkhauser, Providence, RI, 1992, pp. 373–376], which was first suggested by D. Rudolph [<italic>A characterization of those processes finitarily isomorphic to a Bernoulli shift</italic>, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass., 1981, pp. 1–64]. We further show that any ergodic system is isomorphic to a process none of whose finitary factors are i.i.d. processes, and in particular, there is no general finitary Sinai’s factor theorem for ergodic processes. Another consequence of this result is the invalidity of a finitary weak Pinsker property, answering a question of G. Pete and T. Austin [Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 128 (2018), 1–119].</p>","PeriodicalId":23209,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Mathematical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Mathematical Society","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We show the invalidity of finitary counterparts for three classification theorems: The preservation of being a Bernoulli shift through factors, Sinai’s factor theorem, and the weak Pinsker property. We construct a finitary factor of an i.i.d. process which is not finitarily isomorphic to an i.i.d. process, showing that being finitarily Bernoulli is not preserved through finitary factors. This refutes a conjecture of M. Smorodinsky [Finitary isomorphism of mm-dependent processes, Amer. Math. Soc., Birkhauser, Providence, RI, 1992, pp. 373–376], which was first suggested by D. Rudolph [A characterization of those processes finitarily isomorphic to a Bernoulli shift, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass., 1981, pp. 1–64]. We further show that any ergodic system is isomorphic to a process none of whose finitary factors are i.i.d. processes, and in particular, there is no general finitary Sinai’s factor theorem for ergodic processes. Another consequence of this result is the invalidity of a finitary weak Pinsker property, answering a question of G. Pete and T. Austin [Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 128 (2018), 1–119].
我们证明了三个分类定理的有限对应定理的无效性:通过因子保持伯努利位移、西奈因子定理和弱平斯克性质。我们构造了一个 i.i.d. 过程的有限因式,它与 i.i.d. 过程不是有限同构的,这表明有限伯努利转移并不能通过有限因式得到保留。这反驳了 M. Smorodinsky 的猜想[Finitary isomorphism of m m -dependent processes, Amer.M. Smorodinsky [Finitary isomorphism of m md -ependent processes, Amer.Soc.,Birkhauser,Providence,RI,1992,pp.373-376],该猜想最早由 D. Rudolph 提出[A characterization of those processes finitarily isomorphic to a Bernoulli shift,Birkhäuser,Boston,Mass.,1981,pp.1-64]。我们进一步证明,任何遍历系统都同构于一个过程,其有限因子都不是 i.i.d. 过程,特别是,遍历过程不存在一般的有限西奈因子定理。这一结果的另一个后果是有限弱平斯克性质的无效性,回答了 G. Pete 和 T. Austin 的一个问题[Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci.
期刊介绍:
All articles submitted to this journal are peer-reviewed. The AMS has a single blind peer-review process in which the reviewers know who the authors of the manuscript are, but the authors do not have access to the information on who the peer reviewers are.
This journal is devoted to research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics. To be published in the Transactions, a paper must be correct, new, and significant. Further, it must be well written and of interest to a substantial number of mathematicians. Piecemeal results, such as an inconclusive step toward an unproved major theorem or a minor variation on a known result, are in general not acceptable for publication. Papers of less than 15 printed pages that meet the above criteria should be submitted to the Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. Published pages are the same size as those generated in the style files provided for AMS-LaTeX.