Development of plant-based burger patties with pea protein isolate and barnyard millet flour and its storage stability in aerobic and vacuum packaging

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Cynthia Wen Xuan Neo, Yu Hsuan How, Ianne Kong, Rosnita A. Talib, Liew Phing Pui
{"title":"Development of plant-based burger patties with pea protein isolate and barnyard millet flour and its storage stability in aerobic and vacuum packaging","authors":"Cynthia Wen Xuan Neo,&nbsp;Yu Hsuan How,&nbsp;Ianne Kong,&nbsp;Rosnita A. Talib,&nbsp;Liew Phing Pui","doi":"10.1111/jfs.13134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is an increasing demand for plant-based burger patties owing to the health and sustainability issues raised from the consumption of meat. This study aimed to develop plant-based burger patties from pea protein isolates (PPIs) and barnyard millet flour (BMF) through high-moisture extrusion cooking. The extrudates for plant-based burger patties were developed with a blend ratio of 90:10 PPIs:BMF with different screw speeds ranging from 40 to 120 rpm. The extrudates produced with different screw speeds were analyzed, followed by the analysis of the plant-based burger patties. Commercial plant-based burger patties were used as a control. The optimized plant-based burger patties were then stored in aerobic or vacuum packaging for 12 days under refrigerated condition and analyzed. The optimized extrudates produced using screw speed of 80 rpm displayed moderate water absorption index (3.33%), high hardness (4143–4390 g), and high adhesion (0.47 mJ). The plant-based burger patties produced using the optimized extrudates had 2006–2608-g hardness, 0.17 cohesiveness, and 6.70% cooking loss. In comparison to aerobic packaging, the plant-based burger patties stored in vacuum packaging demonstrated lower cooking loss (8.46%), moisture content (18.03%), total color difference (3.02), and total plate count (8.65 log<sub>10</sub> cfu/g) after 12 days of refrigerated storage. The protein content of plant-based burger patties was not affected throughout the refrigerated storage. This shows the potential of PPIs and BMF mixtures as meat analogue ingredients and the suitability of vacuum packaging for the storage of plant-based meat.</p>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.13134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for plant-based burger patties owing to the health and sustainability issues raised from the consumption of meat. This study aimed to develop plant-based burger patties from pea protein isolates (PPIs) and barnyard millet flour (BMF) through high-moisture extrusion cooking. The extrudates for plant-based burger patties were developed with a blend ratio of 90:10 PPIs:BMF with different screw speeds ranging from 40 to 120 rpm. The extrudates produced with different screw speeds were analyzed, followed by the analysis of the plant-based burger patties. Commercial plant-based burger patties were used as a control. The optimized plant-based burger patties were then stored in aerobic or vacuum packaging for 12 days under refrigerated condition and analyzed. The optimized extrudates produced using screw speed of 80 rpm displayed moderate water absorption index (3.33%), high hardness (4143–4390 g), and high adhesion (0.47 mJ). The plant-based burger patties produced using the optimized extrudates had 2006–2608-g hardness, 0.17 cohesiveness, and 6.70% cooking loss. In comparison to aerobic packaging, the plant-based burger patties stored in vacuum packaging demonstrated lower cooking loss (8.46%), moisture content (18.03%), total color difference (3.02), and total plate count (8.65 log10 cfu/g) after 12 days of refrigerated storage. The protein content of plant-based burger patties was not affected throughout the refrigerated storage. This shows the potential of PPIs and BMF mixtures as meat analogue ingredients and the suitability of vacuum packaging for the storage of plant-based meat.

Abstract Image

用豌豆蛋白分离物和稗子粉开发植物性汉堡肉饼及其在有氧和真空包装中的储存稳定性
由于肉类消费引发的健康和可持续发展问题,人们对植物性汉堡肉饼的需求日益增加。本研究旨在利用豌豆蛋白分离物(PPIs)和稗小麦粉(BMF),通过高水分挤压蒸煮法开发植物性汉堡肉饼。以 90:10 的 PPIs:BMF 混合比例和 40 至 120 rpm 的不同螺杆转速开发了用于制作植物汉堡肉饼的挤出物。对以不同螺杆速度生产的挤出物进行了分析,然后对植物汉堡肉饼进行了分析。商用植物性汉堡肉饼作为对照。优化后的植物性汉堡肉饼在冷藏条件下用有氧包装或真空包装保存 12 天后进行分析。使用 80 rpm 螺杆转速生产的优化挤出物显示出中等吸水指数(3.33%)、高硬度(4143-4390 g)和高粘附性(0.47 mJ)。使用优化挤出物生产的植物性汉堡肉饼的硬度为 2006-2608g,粘性为 0.17,蒸煮损失为 6.70%。与有氧包装相比,用真空包装贮藏的植物性汉堡肉饼在冷藏贮藏 12 天后,蒸煮损失(8.46%)、水分含量(18.03%)、总色差(3.02)和菌落总数(8.65 log10 cfu/g)均有所降低。植物性汉堡肉饼的蛋白质含量在整个冷藏储存过程中未受影响。这表明了 PPIs 和 BMF 混合物作为肉类类似配料的潜力,以及真空包装对植物肉贮藏的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Safety
Journal of Food Safety 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信