Postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone in pN1 oral cavity cancer patients: A meta-analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Tsung-You Tsai MD, Pin-Chun Chiang MD, Wing-Keen Yap MD, Yenlin Huang MD, PhD, Anna See MMed, MPH, Shao-Yu Hung MD, Chuieng-Yi Lu MD, Chien-Yu Lin MD, Tung-Chieh Joseph Chang MD, Huang-Kai Kao MD, Kai-Ping Chang MD, PhD
{"title":"Postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone in pN1 oral cavity cancer patients: A meta-analysis","authors":"Tsung-You Tsai MD,&nbsp;Pin-Chun Chiang MD,&nbsp;Wing-Keen Yap MD,&nbsp;Yenlin Huang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Anna See MMed, MPH,&nbsp;Shao-Yu Hung MD,&nbsp;Chuieng-Yi Lu MD,&nbsp;Chien-Yu Lin MD,&nbsp;Tung-Chieh Joseph Chang MD,&nbsp;Huang-Kai Kao MD,&nbsp;Kai-Ping Chang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with pN1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A literature search through major databases was conducted until January 2023. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different survival outcomes were extracted and pooled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten studies published between 2005 and 2022, with a pooled patient population of 2888, were included in this meta-analysis. Due to differences in study design and reported outcomes, the studies were categorized into distinct groups. In pN1 patients without extranodal extension (ENE), PORT was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61–0.94). In pN1 patients without ENE and positive margins, PORT improved OS (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.89) and was associated with a lower regional recurrence rate (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15–0.83). However, in pN1 patients without ENE, positive margins, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, there were no significant differences observed between the PORT and observation groups in either 5-year OS (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.07–3.41) or 5-year disease-free survival (RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.07–2.06).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The current study demonstrated that PORT has the potential to improve OS in pN1 disease. However, the decision of whether to administer PORT still hinges on diverse clinical scenarios, and additional research is necessary to furnish a more conclusive resolution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.1260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with pN1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

A literature search through major databases was conducted until January 2023. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different survival outcomes were extracted and pooled.

Results

Ten studies published between 2005 and 2022, with a pooled patient population of 2888, were included in this meta-analysis. Due to differences in study design and reported outcomes, the studies were categorized into distinct groups. In pN1 patients without extranodal extension (ENE), PORT was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61–0.94). In pN1 patients without ENE and positive margins, PORT improved OS (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.89) and was associated with a lower regional recurrence rate (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15–0.83). However, in pN1 patients without ENE, positive margins, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, there were no significant differences observed between the PORT and observation groups in either 5-year OS (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.07–3.41) or 5-year disease-free survival (RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.07–2.06).

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated that PORT has the potential to improve OS in pN1 disease. However, the decision of whether to administer PORT still hinges on diverse clinical scenarios, and additional research is necessary to furnish a more conclusive resolution.

Level of Evidence

2.

Abstract Image

口腔癌 pN1 患者术后放疗与单纯手术治疗的比较:荟萃分析
目的 本荟萃分析旨在评估口腔鳞状细胞癌 pN1 患者术后放疗(PORT)的潜在益处。 方法 在 2023 年 1 月之前通过主要数据库进行文献检索。提取并汇总了不同生存结果的调整后危险比(aHR)或风险比(RR)及 95% 置信区间(CI)。 结果 本次荟萃分析纳入了 2005 年至 2022 年间发表的 10 项研究,汇总患者人数为 2888 人。由于研究设计和报告结果的不同,这些研究被分为不同的组别。在无结节外扩展(ENE)的pN1患者中,PORT与总生存期(OS)的显著改善相关(aHR 0.76,95% CI:0.61-0.94)。在没有ENE和边缘阳性的pN1患者中,PORT可改善OS(aHR 0.71,95% CI:0.56-0.89),并与较低的区域复发率相关(RR 0.35,95% CI:0.15-0.83)。然而,在没有 ENE、边缘阳性、神经周围侵犯和淋巴管侵犯的 pN1 患者中,PORT 组和观察组在 5 年 OS(RR 0.48,95% CI:0.07-3.41)或 5 年无病生存率(RR 0.37,95% CI:0.07-2.06)方面均无显著差异。 结论 目前的研究表明,PORT 有可能改善 pN1 疾病的 OS。然而,是否使用 PORT 仍取决于不同的临床情况,因此有必要进行更多的研究,以提供更具结论性的解决方案。 证据等级 2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信