An MRI study demonstrating consistent anatomic relation of central longitudinal artery and associated periosteal vessels with the medial femoral epicondyle and adductor tubercle-A visual landmark method for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/ca.24173
Vipul Mandalia, Rahul Anaspure, Sharief Aboelmagd, Roy Powell, William Manning
{"title":"An MRI study demonstrating consistent anatomic relation of central longitudinal artery and associated periosteal vessels with the medial femoral epicondyle and adductor tubercle-A visual landmark method for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Vipul Mandalia, Rahul Anaspure, Sharief Aboelmagd, Roy Powell, William Manning","doi":"10.1002/ca.24173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The two most common techniques to determine femoral tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction are radiographic and by palpation. Their intra/interobserver reliability is widely debated. Both techniques rely on identifying bony landmarks such as the medial epicondyle (ME) and adductor tubercle (AT) during surgery. During MPFL reconstructive surgery, the central longitudinal vessels (CLVs) are seen consistently. The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomic relationship of CLV to ME and AT and to determine if CLV might be used as a landmark during MPFL reconstruction. A retrospective review of MRI scans in skeletally mature patients was undertake. There were two groups, a PFI group that consisted of patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral instabiliy (PFI) and a non-PFI group that underwent MRI scan for an alternative diagnosis. MRIs were measured for the CLV-ME-AT anatomy and relationship. Following exclusions, 50 patients were identified in each group. The CLV passed anterior to the AT and ME in all patients. ME morphology did not differ greatly between the groups except in the tubercle height, where there was statistically significant but not a clinically important difference (larger in the non-PFI group, 2.95 vs. 2.52 mm, p = 0.002). The CLV to ME tip distance was consistent between the groups (PFI group 3.8 mm and non-PFI group 3.9 mm). The CLV-ME-AT relationship remained consistent irrespective of patients' presenting pathology. The CLV consistently courses anterior to ME and AT. The CLV could be used as a vascular landmark assisting femoral tunnel placement during MPFL reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The two most common techniques to determine femoral tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction are radiographic and by palpation. Their intra/interobserver reliability is widely debated. Both techniques rely on identifying bony landmarks such as the medial epicondyle (ME) and adductor tubercle (AT) during surgery. During MPFL reconstructive surgery, the central longitudinal vessels (CLVs) are seen consistently. The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomic relationship of CLV to ME and AT and to determine if CLV might be used as a landmark during MPFL reconstruction. A retrospective review of MRI scans in skeletally mature patients was undertake. There were two groups, a PFI group that consisted of patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral instabiliy (PFI) and a non-PFI group that underwent MRI scan for an alternative diagnosis. MRIs were measured for the CLV-ME-AT anatomy and relationship. Following exclusions, 50 patients were identified in each group. The CLV passed anterior to the AT and ME in all patients. ME morphology did not differ greatly between the groups except in the tubercle height, where there was statistically significant but not a clinically important difference (larger in the non-PFI group, 2.95 vs. 2.52 mm, p = 0.002). The CLV to ME tip distance was consistent between the groups (PFI group 3.8 mm and non-PFI group 3.9 mm). The CLV-ME-AT relationship remained consistent irrespective of patients' presenting pathology. The CLV consistently courses anterior to ME and AT. The CLV could be used as a vascular landmark assisting femoral tunnel placement during MPFL reconstruction.

一项核磁共振成像研究显示,股骨中央纵动脉和相关骨膜血管与股骨内上髁和内收肌结节的解剖学关系一致--髌骨内侧韧带重建术中股骨隧道置入的视觉地标法。
在髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建过程中,确定股骨隧道位置最常用的两种技术是射线成像和触诊。观察者内部/观察者之间对这两种方法的可靠性存在广泛争议。这两种技术都依赖于在手术中识别骨性地标,如内侧上髁(ME)和内收肌结节(AT)。在 MPFL 重建手术中,中央纵向血管(CLVs)的显露是一致的。本研究旨在探讨CLV与ME和AT的解剖关系,并确定CLV是否可在MPFL重建过程中用作地标。研究人员对骨骼成熟患者的核磁共振扫描进行了回顾性审查。该研究分为两组,一组是被诊断为髌股关节不稳定(PFI)的患者,另一组是接受磁共振成像扫描进行其他诊断的非PFI患者。核磁共振成像对CLV-ME-AT的解剖结构和关系进行了测量。经过排除,每组确定了 50 名患者。所有患者的CLV都通过AT和ME的前方。除结节高度外,ME 形态在各组之间没有很大差异,差异有统计学意义,但无临床意义(非 PFI 组较大,2.95 毫米对 2.52 毫米,P = 0.002)。各组之间 CLV 到 ME 尖部的距离一致(PFI 组为 3.8 毫米,非 PFI 组为 3.9 毫米)。无论患者的病理表现如何,CLV-ME-AT 关系都保持一致。CLV始终先于ME和AT。在进行 MPFL 重建时,CLV 可作为辅助股骨隧道置入的血管标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Anatomy
Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信