Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/vsu.14104
Annellie K Miller, Penny J Regier, Federico R Vilaplana Grosso, Edward J Daly, Bailey N Carroll, James C Colee
{"title":"Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement.","authors":"Annellie K Miller, Penny J Regier, Federico R Vilaplana Grosso, Edward J Daly, Bailey N Carroll, James C Colee","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report gross anatomical gastrointestinal measurements and compare enterotomy leak pressures between fresh and cooled feline cadavers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ex vivo, randomized study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Fresh feline cadavers (n = 20).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Jejunal segments (8 cm) were harvested on the same day as euthanasia. From each cadaver, one segment was randomly assigned to control (C), fresh enterotomy (FE), and cooled enterotomy (CE) groups. Enterotomy construction and leak testing were performed within 12 h of euthanasia for the C and FE groups and after 17-29 h of cooling for the CE group. Initial leak pressure (ILP) and maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) were compared. Gastrointestinal wall thickness and intraluminal diameter were measured on harvested applicable gastrointestinal divisions at up to three time points: day 1 fresh, day 2 cooled, and day 3 cooled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (± SD) ILPs for the C, FE, and CE constructs were 600 (± 0.0), 200.3 (± 114.7), and 131.3 (± 92.6) mmHg, respectively. The C ILP was higher (p < .001) than the FE and CE ILP. The ILP (p = .11) and the MIP (p = .21) did not differ between the FE and CE constructs. Wall thickness (measured in mm) did not differ between duodenum day 1 fresh and day 2 cooled groups (p = .18) or between any jejunum day groups (p = .86). The intraluminal diameters (mean ± SD) for the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 5.7 (± 0.7), 5.8 (± 0.8), and 7.2 (± 2.2) mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No difference was appreciated between FE and CE ILP and MIP. Wall thickness measurements did not differ between days for duodenum or jejunum.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Cadaveric feline intestine cooled for up to 29 h may be used for determining intestinal leak pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"926-935"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report gross anatomical gastrointestinal measurements and compare enterotomy leak pressures between fresh and cooled feline cadavers.

Study design: Ex vivo, randomized study.

Animals: Fresh feline cadavers (n = 20).

Methods: Jejunal segments (8 cm) were harvested on the same day as euthanasia. From each cadaver, one segment was randomly assigned to control (C), fresh enterotomy (FE), and cooled enterotomy (CE) groups. Enterotomy construction and leak testing were performed within 12 h of euthanasia for the C and FE groups and after 17-29 h of cooling for the CE group. Initial leak pressure (ILP) and maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) were compared. Gastrointestinal wall thickness and intraluminal diameter were measured on harvested applicable gastrointestinal divisions at up to three time points: day 1 fresh, day 2 cooled, and day 3 cooled.

Results: The mean (± SD) ILPs for the C, FE, and CE constructs were 600 (± 0.0), 200.3 (± 114.7), and 131.3 (± 92.6) mmHg, respectively. The C ILP was higher (p < .001) than the FE and CE ILP. The ILP (p = .11) and the MIP (p = .21) did not differ between the FE and CE constructs. Wall thickness (measured in mm) did not differ between duodenum day 1 fresh and day 2 cooled groups (p = .18) or between any jejunum day groups (p = .86). The intraluminal diameters (mean ± SD) for the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 5.7 (± 0.7), 5.8 (± 0.8), and 7.2 (± 2.2) mm, respectively.

Conclusion: No difference was appreciated between FE and CE ILP and MIP. Wall thickness measurements did not differ between days for duodenum or jejunum.

Clinical relevance: Cadaveric feline intestine cooled for up to 29 h may be used for determining intestinal leak pressures.

冷却猫肠和新鲜肠在肠道泄漏压力测试或肠壁厚度测量中没有差异。
目的:报告猫科动物尸体的胃肠道大体解剖测量结果,并比较新鲜和冷却猫科动物尸体的肠切开漏压:报告胃肠道大体解剖学测量结果,并比较新鲜和冷却猫科动物尸体的肠管切开泄漏压力:研究设计:体外随机研究:动物:新鲜猫科动物尸体(n = 20):方法:在安乐死当天采集猫尸体的空肠节段(8 厘米)。每具尸体的一个肠段被随机分配到对照组(C)、新鲜肠切开术组(FE)和冷却肠切开术组(CE)。C 组和 FE 组在安乐死后 12 小时内进行肠管切开术和泄漏测试,CE 组在冷却 17-29 小时后进行肠管切开术和泄漏测试。比较了初始泄漏压力(ILP)和最大腔内压力(MIP)。胃肠壁厚度和腔内直径是在三个时间点测量的:新鲜第1天、冷却第2天和冷却第3天:结果:C、FE 和 CE 构建物的平均(± SD)ILP 分别为 600(± 0.0)、200.3(± 114.7)和 131.3(± 92.6)mmHg。C ILP 较高(PFE 和 CE ILP 与 MIP 之间没有明显差异。十二指肠和空肠的肠壁厚度测量值在不同日期之间没有差异:临床意义:冷却长达 29 小时的猫科动物尸体肠道可用于确定肠道泄漏压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信