The standardized training and assessment system for magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (with video).

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jing Li, Mudan Ren, Li Ren, Yumei Luo, Huanhuan Sun, Zhiyong Zhang, Shuixiang He, Guifang Lu
{"title":"The standardized training and assessment system for magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (with video).","authors":"Jing Li, Mudan Ren, Li Ren, Yumei Luo, Huanhuan Sun, Zhiyong Zhang, Shuixiang He, Guifang Lu","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2354424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>To explore the feasibility of a standardized training and assessment system for magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of 90 trainees who underwent the standardized training and assessment system of the MCCG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from May 2020 to November 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. The trainees were divided into three groups according to their medical backgrounds: doctor, nurse, and non-medical groups. The training and assessment system adopted the '7 + 2' mode, seven days of training plus two days of theoretical and operational assessment. The passing rates of theoretical, operational, and total assessment were the primary outcomes. Satisfaction and mastery of the MCCG was checked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety trainees were assessed; theoretical assessment's passing rates in the three groups were 100%. The operational and total assessment passing rates were 100% (25/25), 97.92% (47/48), and 94.12% (16/17), for the doctor, nurse, and non-doctor groups respectively, with no significant difference (χ<sup>2</sup> = 1.741, <i>p</i> = 0.419). No bleeding or perforation occurred during the procedure. Approximately, 96.00% (24/25), 95.83% (46/48), and 94.12% (16/17) of the doctor, nurse and non-medical groups anonymously expressed great satisfaction, respectively, without statistically significant difference (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.565, <i>p</i> = 1.000). The average follow-up time was 4-36 months, and 87 trainees (96.67%) had mastered the operation of the MCCG in daily work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized training and assessment of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopists is effective and feasible. Additionally, a strict assessment system and long-term communication and learning can improve teaching effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"989-995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2354424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: To explore the feasibility of a standardized training and assessment system for magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG).

Methods: The results of 90 trainees who underwent the standardized training and assessment system of the MCCG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from May 2020 to November 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. The trainees were divided into three groups according to their medical backgrounds: doctor, nurse, and non-medical groups. The training and assessment system adopted the '7 + 2' mode, seven days of training plus two days of theoretical and operational assessment. The passing rates of theoretical, operational, and total assessment were the primary outcomes. Satisfaction and mastery of the MCCG was checked.

Results: Ninety trainees were assessed; theoretical assessment's passing rates in the three groups were 100%. The operational and total assessment passing rates were 100% (25/25), 97.92% (47/48), and 94.12% (16/17), for the doctor, nurse, and non-doctor groups respectively, with no significant difference (χ2 = 1.741, p = 0.419). No bleeding or perforation occurred during the procedure. Approximately, 96.00% (24/25), 95.83% (46/48), and 94.12% (16/17) of the doctor, nurse and non-medical groups anonymously expressed great satisfaction, respectively, without statistically significant difference (χ2 = 0.565, p = 1.000). The average follow-up time was 4-36 months, and 87 trainees (96.67%) had mastered the operation of the MCCG in daily work.

Conclusions: Standardized training and assessment of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopists is effective and feasible. Additionally, a strict assessment system and long-term communication and learning can improve teaching effects.

磁控胶囊胃镜标准化培训和评估系统(附视频)。
背景和目的:探讨磁控胶囊胃镜(MCCG)标准化培训和考核体系的可行性:回顾性分析2020年5月至2023年11月在西安交通大学第一附属医院接受磁控胶囊胃镜标准化培训和考核制度的90名学员的培训结果。学员按医学背景分为三组:医生组、护士组和非医生组。培训和考核制度采用 "7+2 "模式,即七天培训加两天理论和操作考核。理论、操作和总评的通过率是主要结果。结果:90 名学员接受了评估;三组学员的理论评估通过率均为 100%。医生组、护士组和非医生组的操作和总评估合格率分别为 100%(25/25)、97.92%(47/48)和 94.12%(16/17),无显著差异(χ2 = 1.741,P = 0.419)。手术过程中未发生出血或穿孔。医生组、护士组和非医生组分别有约 96.00%(24/25)、95.83%(46/48)和 94.12%(16/17)的匿名患者表示非常满意,差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.565,P = 1.000)。平均随访时间为 4-36 个月,87 名学员(96.67%)在日常工作中熟练掌握了磁共振成像仪的操作:结论:对磁控胶囊内镜医师进行标准化培训和评估是有效和可行的。结论:对磁控胶囊内镜医师进行标准化培训和考核是有效可行的,此外,严格的考核制度和长期的交流学习也能提高教学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信