Retrospective study of laboratory-based surveillance of rabies in wild and domestic animals in the southern United States, 2010-2021.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Marcia R S Ilha, Katie A Dawson, Emily L Atkinson, Erin A Graham, Moges W Woldemeskel, Yung-Yi C Mosley, Michele D Coarsey, Hemant K Naikare
{"title":"Retrospective study of laboratory-based surveillance of rabies in wild and domestic animals in the southern United States, 2010-2021.","authors":"Marcia R S Ilha, Katie A Dawson, Emily L Atkinson, Erin A Graham, Moges W Woldemeskel, Yung-Yi C Mosley, Michele D Coarsey, Hemant K Naikare","doi":"10.1177/10406387241247283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a retrospective study of all case submissions for the rabies virus (RABV) direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) requested of the Tifton Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory (Tifton, GA, USA) between July 2010 and June 2021. Submitted were 792 samples from 23 animal species from 89 counties in Georgia, and 4 neighboring counties in Florida, 1 in South Carolina, and 1 in Alabama. In 13 (1.6%) cases, the DFAT result was inconclusive; 779 (98.4%) cases had a conclusive (positive or negative) test result. Of these 779 cases, 79 (10.1%) tested positive across 10 species. The remaining 700 (89.9%) cases were negative. The main reason for submission for RABV testing was human exposure to a potentially rabid animal in 414 (52.3%) cases. Among the 79 positive cases, 74 (93.7%) involved wildlife; raccoons (51 cases; 68.9%) were the primary host confirmed with RABV infection, followed by skunk and fox (8 cases each; 10.8%), bobcat (5 cases; 6.8%), and bats (2 cases; 2.7%). Only 5 domestic animals (6.3% of the positive cases) tested positive during our study period; one from each of the bovine, canine, caprine, equine, and feline species. Hence, the sylvatic cycle plays the predominant role in circulating RABV infection in our study area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387241247283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed a retrospective study of all case submissions for the rabies virus (RABV) direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) requested of the Tifton Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory (Tifton, GA, USA) between July 2010 and June 2021. Submitted were 792 samples from 23 animal species from 89 counties in Georgia, and 4 neighboring counties in Florida, 1 in South Carolina, and 1 in Alabama. In 13 (1.6%) cases, the DFAT result was inconclusive; 779 (98.4%) cases had a conclusive (positive or negative) test result. Of these 779 cases, 79 (10.1%) tested positive across 10 species. The remaining 700 (89.9%) cases were negative. The main reason for submission for RABV testing was human exposure to a potentially rabid animal in 414 (52.3%) cases. Among the 79 positive cases, 74 (93.7%) involved wildlife; raccoons (51 cases; 68.9%) were the primary host confirmed with RABV infection, followed by skunk and fox (8 cases each; 10.8%), bobcat (5 cases; 6.8%), and bats (2 cases; 2.7%). Only 5 domestic animals (6.3% of the positive cases) tested positive during our study period; one from each of the bovine, canine, caprine, equine, and feline species. Hence, the sylvatic cycle plays the predominant role in circulating RABV infection in our study area.

2010-2021 年美国南部野生和家养动物狂犬病实验室监测回顾性研究。
我们对 2010 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月期间蒂夫顿兽医诊断和调查实验室(美国佐治亚州蒂夫顿)申请狂犬病病毒(RABV)直接荧光抗体检测(DFAT)的所有病例进行了回顾性研究。提交的 792 份样本来自佐治亚州 89 个县、佛罗里达州 4 个邻县、南卡罗来纳州 1 个邻县和阿拉巴马州 1 个邻县的 23 种动物。有 13 个病例(1.6%)的 DFAT 检测结果为不确定;779 个病例(98.4%)的检测结果为确定(阳性或阴性)。在这 779 个案例中,79 个(10.1%)在 10 个物种中检测出阳性。其余 700 个病例(89.9%)呈阴性。414例(52.3%)提交狂犬病病毒检测的主要原因是人类接触了可能患有狂犬病的动物。在79例阳性病例中,74例(93.7%)涉及野生动物;浣熊(51例;68.9%)是确诊感染RABV的主要宿主,其次是臭鼬和狐狸(各8例;10.8%)、山猫(5例;6.8%)和蝙蝠(2例;2.7%)。在我们的研究期间,只有 5 只家畜(占阳性病例的 6.3%)检测呈阳性;牛、犬、山羊、马和猫科动物各 1 只。因此,在我们的研究地区,鼠疫循环在 RABV 循环感染中起着主要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation (J Vet Diagn Invest) is an international peer-reviewed journal published bimonthly in English by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD). JVDI is devoted to all aspects of veterinary laboratory diagnostic science including the major disciplines of anatomic pathology, bacteriology/mycology, clinical pathology, epidemiology, immunology, laboratory information management, molecular biology, parasitology, public health, toxicology, and virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信