Endobronchial Phenylephrine in Airway Bleeding During Bronchoscopy Does not Cause Hypertension: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jeremy Kim, Chinh Phan, Jason Adams, Irene Cortes-Puch, Jacqueline C Stocking, Anna Liu, Yunyi Ren, Sandra Taylor, Ken Y Yoneda
{"title":"Endobronchial Phenylephrine in Airway Bleeding During Bronchoscopy Does not Cause Hypertension: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Jeremy Kim, Chinh Phan, Jason Adams, Irene Cortes-Puch, Jacqueline C Stocking, Anna Liu, Yunyi Ren, Sandra Taylor, Ken Y Yoneda","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bleeding is a known complication during bronchoscopy, with increased incidence in patients undergoing a more invasive procedure. Phenylephrine is a potent vasoconstrictor that can control airway bleeding when applied topically and has been used as an alternative to epinephrine. The clinical effects of endobronchial phenylephrine on systemic vasoconstriction have not been clearly evaluated. Here, we compared the effects of endobronchial phenylephrine versus cold saline on systemic blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 160 patients who underwent bronchoscopy and received either endobronchial phenylephrine or cold saline from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2022 were included in this retrospective observational study. Intra-procedural blood pressure absolute and percent changes were measured and compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no observed statistical differences in blood pressure changes between groups. The median absolute change between the median and the maximum intra-procedural systolic blood pressure in the cold saline group was 29 mm Hg (IQR 19 to 41) compared with 31.8 mm Hg (IQR 18 to 45.5) in the phenylephrine group. The corresponding median percent changes in SBP were 33.6 % (IQR 18.8 to 39.4) and 28% (IQR 16.8 to 43.5) for the cold saline and phenylephrine groups, respectively. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure changes between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no significant differences in median intra-procedural systemic blood pressure changes comparing patients who received endobronchial cold saline to those receiving phenylephrine. Overall, this argues for the vascular and systemic safety of phenylephrine for airway bleeding as a reasonable alternative to epinephrine.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bleeding is a known complication during bronchoscopy, with increased incidence in patients undergoing a more invasive procedure. Phenylephrine is a potent vasoconstrictor that can control airway bleeding when applied topically and has been used as an alternative to epinephrine. The clinical effects of endobronchial phenylephrine on systemic vasoconstriction have not been clearly evaluated. Here, we compared the effects of endobronchial phenylephrine versus cold saline on systemic blood pressure.

Methods: In all, 160 patients who underwent bronchoscopy and received either endobronchial phenylephrine or cold saline from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2022 were included in this retrospective observational study. Intra-procedural blood pressure absolute and percent changes were measured and compared between the 2 groups.

Results: There were no observed statistical differences in blood pressure changes between groups. The median absolute change between the median and the maximum intra-procedural systolic blood pressure in the cold saline group was 29 mm Hg (IQR 19 to 41) compared with 31.8 mm Hg (IQR 18 to 45.5) in the phenylephrine group. The corresponding median percent changes in SBP were 33.6 % (IQR 18.8 to 39.4) and 28% (IQR 16.8 to 43.5) for the cold saline and phenylephrine groups, respectively. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure changes between both groups.

Conclusions: We found no significant differences in median intra-procedural systemic blood pressure changes comparing patients who received endobronchial cold saline to those receiving phenylephrine. Overall, this argues for the vascular and systemic safety of phenylephrine for airway bleeding as a reasonable alternative to epinephrine.

支气管镜检查期间气道出血时支气管内注射苯肾上腺素不会导致高血压:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:众所周知,出血是支气管镜检查过程中的一种并发症,在接受创伤更大的手术的患者中发生率更高。苯肾上腺素是一种强效的血管收缩剂,局部应用时可控制气道出血,已被用作肾上腺素的替代品。支气管内注射苯肾上腺素对全身血管收缩的临床效果尚未得到明确评估。在此,我们比较了支气管内注射苯肾上腺素和冷生理盐水对全身血压的影响:这项回顾性观察研究共纳入了 160 名在 2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间接受支气管镜检查并接受支气管内注射苯肾上腺素或冷盐水的患者。研究人员测量了两组患者术中血压的绝对值和百分比变化,并进行了比较:结果:两组间血压变化无统计学差异。冷盐水组术中收缩压中位数和最大值之间的绝对变化中位数为 29 mm Hg(IQR 19 至 41),而苯肾上腺素组为 31.8 mm Hg(IQR 18 至 45.5)。冷盐水组和苯肾上腺素组相应的 SBP 百分比变化中值分别为 33.6%(IQR 18.8 至 39.4)和 28%(IQR 16.8 至 43.5)。同样,两组之间的舒张压和平均动脉血压变化也没有明显的统计学差异:我们发现,接受支气管内冷盐水治疗的患者与接受苯肾上腺素治疗的患者在术中全身血压变化的中位数上没有明显差异。总体而言,这证明了苯肾上腺素治疗气道出血在血管和全身方面的安全性,是肾上腺素的合理替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信