Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities.

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00139
Cedric Foucault, Florent Meyniel
{"title":"Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities.","authors":"Cedric Foucault, Florent Meyniel","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans face a dynamic world that requires them to constantly update their knowledge. Each observation should influence their knowledge to a varying degree depending on whether it arises from a stochastic fluctuation or an environmental change. Thus, humans should dynamically adapt their learning rate based on each observation. Although crucial for characterizing the learning process, these dynamic adjustments have only been investigated empirically in magnitude learning. Another important type of learning is probability learning. The latter differs from the former in that individual observations are much less informative and a single one is insufficient to distinguish environmental changes from stochasticity. Do humans dynamically adapt their learning rate for probabilities? What determinants drive their dynamic adjustments in magnitude and probability learning? To answer these questions, we measured the subjects' learning rate dynamics directly through real-time continuous reports during magnitude and probability learning. We found that subjects dynamically adapt their learning rate in both types of learning. After a change point, they increase their learning rate suddenly for magnitudes and prolongedly for probabilities. Their dynamics are driven differentially by two determinants: change-point probability, the main determinant for magnitudes, and prior uncertainty, the main determinant for probabilities. These results are fully in line with normative theory, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Overall, our findings demonstrate a remarkable human ability for dynamic adaptive learning under uncertainty, and guide studies of the neural mechanisms of learning, highlighting different determinants for magnitudes and probabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"8 ","pages":"615-638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans face a dynamic world that requires them to constantly update their knowledge. Each observation should influence their knowledge to a varying degree depending on whether it arises from a stochastic fluctuation or an environmental change. Thus, humans should dynamically adapt their learning rate based on each observation. Although crucial for characterizing the learning process, these dynamic adjustments have only been investigated empirically in magnitude learning. Another important type of learning is probability learning. The latter differs from the former in that individual observations are much less informative and a single one is insufficient to distinguish environmental changes from stochasticity. Do humans dynamically adapt their learning rate for probabilities? What determinants drive their dynamic adjustments in magnitude and probability learning? To answer these questions, we measured the subjects' learning rate dynamics directly through real-time continuous reports during magnitude and probability learning. We found that subjects dynamically adapt their learning rate in both types of learning. After a change point, they increase their learning rate suddenly for magnitudes and prolongedly for probabilities. Their dynamics are driven differentially by two determinants: change-point probability, the main determinant for magnitudes, and prior uncertainty, the main determinant for probabilities. These results are fully in line with normative theory, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Overall, our findings demonstrate a remarkable human ability for dynamic adaptive learning under uncertainty, and guide studies of the neural mechanisms of learning, highlighting different determinants for magnitudes and probabilities.

幅度和概率动态自适应学习的两个决定因素。
人类面对的是一个动态的世界,需要不断更新自己的知识。每一次观察都会对他们的知识产生不同程度的影响,这取决于观察结果是来自随机波动还是环境变化。因此,人类应该根据每次观察来动态调整自己的学习速度。虽然这些动态调整对于描述学习过程至关重要,但目前只在幅度学习中进行过实证研究。另一种重要的学习类型是概率学习。后者与前者的不同之处在于,单个观察结果的信息量要小得多,而且单个观察结果不足以区分环境变化和随机性。人类是否会动态调整概率学习率?是什么决定因素推动了人类对概率学习的幅度和概率学习的动态调整?为了回答这些问题,我们直接通过幅度和概率学习过程中的实时连续报告来测量受试者的学习率动态。我们发现,在这两种学习中,受试者都会动态调整他们的学习率。在一个变化点之后,受试者会突然提高幅度学习率,而延长概率学习率。他们的动态变化受到两个决定因素的不同驱动:变化点概率是量级学习的主要决定因素,而先验不确定性则是概率学习的主要决定因素。这些结果在定性和定量方面都完全符合规范理论。总之,我们的研究结果证明了人类在不确定性条件下进行动态适应性学习的非凡能力,并为学习的神经机制研究提供了指导,突出了幅度和概率的不同决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信