Comparing Transcriptomic Points of Departure to Apical Effect Concentrations For Larval Fathead Minnow Exposed to Chemicals with Four Different Modes Of Action
Kevin Flynn, Michelle Le, Monique Hazemi, Adam Biales, David C. Bencic, Brett R. Blackwell, Kendra Bush, Robert Flick, John X. Hoang, John Martinson, Mackenzie Morshead, Kelvin Santana Rodriguez, Emma Stacy, Daniel L. Villeneuve
{"title":"Comparing Transcriptomic Points of Departure to Apical Effect Concentrations For Larval Fathead Minnow Exposed to Chemicals with Four Different Modes Of Action","authors":"Kevin Flynn, Michelle Le, Monique Hazemi, Adam Biales, David C. Bencic, Brett R. Blackwell, Kendra Bush, Robert Flick, John X. Hoang, John Martinson, Mackenzie Morshead, Kelvin Santana Rodriguez, Emma Stacy, Daniel L. Villeneuve","doi":"10.1007/s00244-024-01064-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is postulated that below a transcriptomic-based point of departure, adverse effects are unlikely to occur, thereby providing a chemical concentration to use in screening level hazard assessment. The present study extends previous work describing a high-throughput fathead minnow assay that can provide full transcriptomic data after exposure to a test chemical. One-day post-hatch fathead minnows were exposed to ten concentrations of three representatives of four chemical modes of action: organophosphates, ecdysone receptor agonists, plant photosystem II inhibitors, and estrogen receptor agonists for 24 h. Concentration response modeling was performed on whole body gene expression data from each exposure, using measured chemical concentrations when available. Transcriptomic points of departure in larval fathead minnow were lower than apical effect concentrations across fish species but not always lower than toxic effect concentrations in other aquatic taxa like crustaceans and insects. The point of departure was highly dependent on measured chemical concentration which were often lower than the nominal concentration. Differentially expressed genes between chemicals within modes of action were compared and often showed statistically significant overlap. In addition, reproducibility between identical exposures using a positive control chemical (CuSO<sub>4</sub>) and variability associated with the transcriptomic point of departure using <i>in silico</i> sampling were considered. Results extend a transcriptomic-compatible fathead minnow high-throughput assay for possible use in ecological hazard screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8377,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-024-01064-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is postulated that below a transcriptomic-based point of departure, adverse effects are unlikely to occur, thereby providing a chemical concentration to use in screening level hazard assessment. The present study extends previous work describing a high-throughput fathead minnow assay that can provide full transcriptomic data after exposure to a test chemical. One-day post-hatch fathead minnows were exposed to ten concentrations of three representatives of four chemical modes of action: organophosphates, ecdysone receptor agonists, plant photosystem II inhibitors, and estrogen receptor agonists for 24 h. Concentration response modeling was performed on whole body gene expression data from each exposure, using measured chemical concentrations when available. Transcriptomic points of departure in larval fathead minnow were lower than apical effect concentrations across fish species but not always lower than toxic effect concentrations in other aquatic taxa like crustaceans and insects. The point of departure was highly dependent on measured chemical concentration which were often lower than the nominal concentration. Differentially expressed genes between chemicals within modes of action were compared and often showed statistically significant overlap. In addition, reproducibility between identical exposures using a positive control chemical (CuSO4) and variability associated with the transcriptomic point of departure using in silico sampling were considered. Results extend a transcriptomic-compatible fathead minnow high-throughput assay for possible use in ecological hazard screening.
据推测,低于以转录组为基础的起始点,就不太可能出现不良影响,从而提供了用于筛选级危害评估的化学浓度。本研究扩展了之前的工作,描述了一种高通量黑头鲦鱼检测方法,该方法可在暴露于测试化学品后提供完整的转录组数据。将孵化后一天的黑头鲦鱼暴露于四种化学作用模式的三种代表物质(有机磷、蜕皮激素受体激动剂、植物光合系统 II 抑制剂和雌激素受体激动剂)的十种浓度下 24 小时。在所有鱼类物种中,黑头鲦幼体的转录组出发点均低于顶端效应浓度,但并不总是低于甲壳类和昆虫等其他水生类群的毒性效应浓度。出发点在很大程度上取决于测量到的化学物质浓度,这些浓度通常低于标称浓度。对不同作用模式的化学品之间的差异表达基因进行了比较,结果往往显示出统计学上的显著重叠。此外,还考虑了使用阳性对照化学物(CuSO4)在相同暴露条件下的重现性,以及使用硅学取样与转录组出发点相关的变异性。研究结果扩展了与转录组兼容的黑头鲦鱼高通量检测方法,可用于生态危害筛选。
期刊介绍:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology provides a place for the publication of timely, detailed, and definitive scientific studies pertaining to the source, transport, fate and / or effects of contaminants in the environment. The journal will consider submissions dealing with new analytical and toxicological techniques that advance our understanding of the source, transport, fate and / or effects of contaminants in the environment. AECT will now consider mini-reviews (where length including references is less than 5,000 words), which highlight case studies, a geographic topic of interest, or a timely subject of debate. AECT will also consider Special Issues on subjects of broad interest. The journal strongly encourages authors to ensure that their submission places a strong emphasis on ecosystem processes; submissions limited to technical aspects of such areas as toxicity testing for single chemicals, wastewater effluent characterization, human occupation exposure, or agricultural phytotoxicity are unlikely to be considered.