Commentary on the adoption of a test-based versus syndromic-based approach to outbreak declaration and management in hospital and institutional settings.

Patrick Galange, Richard Mather, Barbara Yaffe, Michael Whelan, Michelle Murti
{"title":"Commentary on the adoption of a test-based versus syndromic-based approach to outbreak declaration and management in hospital and institutional settings.","authors":"Patrick Galange, Richard Mather, Barbara Yaffe, Michael Whelan, Michelle Murti","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v50i34a03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At present, Ontario, like most other jurisdictions in Canada, uses a syndromic-based surveillance definition for acute respiratory infection (ARI) outbreaks in institutions and public hospitals. Confirmed outbreaks are defined as either two or more ARIs in 48 hours with any common epidemiological link and at least one that is laboratory-confirmed; or three cases of ARIs occurring within 48 hours with any common epidemiological link, and not necessarily with lab confirmation. However, with the adoption of broader test-based approaches for sick patients/residents throughout the pandemic, new challenges have surfaced regarding the declaration and management of ARI outbreaks with a variety of scenarios in respiratory testing results. Decisions, including the determination of epidemiological linkage when there are discordant/negative test results, have become more complicated with the addition of virus-specific test results for every sick individual. The ARI outbreak case definition and management guidance was updated in 2018. The purpose of this commentary is to highlight epidemiological trends in ARI outbreaks in Ontario over the 2022-2023 season compared to the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 pre-pandemic seasons. This is followed by a discussion around some of the benefits and challenges of implementing a test-based versus syndromic-based approach to ARI outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v50i34a03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, Ontario, like most other jurisdictions in Canada, uses a syndromic-based surveillance definition for acute respiratory infection (ARI) outbreaks in institutions and public hospitals. Confirmed outbreaks are defined as either two or more ARIs in 48 hours with any common epidemiological link and at least one that is laboratory-confirmed; or three cases of ARIs occurring within 48 hours with any common epidemiological link, and not necessarily with lab confirmation. However, with the adoption of broader test-based approaches for sick patients/residents throughout the pandemic, new challenges have surfaced regarding the declaration and management of ARI outbreaks with a variety of scenarios in respiratory testing results. Decisions, including the determination of epidemiological linkage when there are discordant/negative test results, have become more complicated with the addition of virus-specific test results for every sick individual. The ARI outbreak case definition and management guidance was updated in 2018. The purpose of this commentary is to highlight epidemiological trends in ARI outbreaks in Ontario over the 2022-2023 season compared to the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 pre-pandemic seasons. This is followed by a discussion around some of the benefits and challenges of implementing a test-based versus syndromic-based approach to ARI outbreaks.

关于在医院和机构环境中采用基于检测和基于综合征的方法来宣布和管理疫情的评论。
目前,安大略省与加拿大其他大多数辖区一样,对机构和公立医院爆发的急性呼吸道感染(ARI)采用基于综合征的监测定义。确诊疫情的定义是:48 小时内发生两例或两例以上急性呼吸道感染,且有任何共同的流行病学联系,并至少有一例得到实验室确诊;或 48 小时内发生三例急性呼吸道感染,且有任何共同的流行病学联系,但不一定得到实验室确诊。然而,由于在整个大流行期间对病人/居民采用了更广泛的基于检测的方法,在呼吸道检测结果多种多样的情况下,在宣布和管理急性呼吸道感染疫情方面出现了新的挑战。随着每个病人的特异性病毒检测结果的增加,包括在出现不一致/阴性检测结果时确定流行病学联系在内的决策变得更加复杂。2018 年更新了 ARI 爆发病例定义和管理指南。本评论旨在强调与 2018-2019 年和 2019-2020 年流行前季节相比,安大略省 2022-2023 年季节 ARI 爆发的流行病学趋势。随后,将围绕对急性呼吸道感染暴发实施基于检测的方法与基于综合征的方法的一些益处和挑战展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信