Outcomes of 881 Consecutive Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients Using Heartstring Device.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kentaro Amano, Yoshiyuki Takami, Atsuo Maekawa, Koji Yamana, Kiyotoshi Akita, Kazuki Matsuhashi, Wakana Niwa, Yasushi Takagi
{"title":"Outcomes of 881 Consecutive Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients Using Heartstring Device.","authors":"Kentaro Amano, Yoshiyuki Takami, Atsuo Maekawa, Koji Yamana, Kiyotoshi Akita, Kazuki Matsuhashi, Wakana Niwa, Yasushi Takagi","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong> One of the strategies to prevent stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be the use of a device for proximal anastomosis without partial clamp of the ascending aorta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We retrospectively investigated early and late outcomes in consecutive 881 patients undergoing isolated CABG using Heartstring for proximal anastomosis from January 2008 to December 2022, to reveal the validity to use it. All patients underwent preoperative imaging workups to evaluate neurovascular atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The mean age of the patients was 68.9 years, 20% were female and 13% had previous history of stroke. CABG was on-pump beating heart (52.2%) or off-pump (47.8%) with a mean number of distal anastomoses of 3.38 ± 0.93, using 1.62 ± 0.53 Heartstring devices under different aortic manipulations. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% and perioperative stroke rate was 0.9%, none of them died during hospital stay. During the follow-up period of 70 ± 47 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were 86 and 66%, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)-free rates were 86 and 70% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, risk factors for late death included male, previous history of stroke, postoperative sternomediastinitis, late new-onset stroke, and MACCEs, but did not include the perioperative stroke.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Low stroke rate, as low as 0.9%, after CABG using Heartstring for proximal anastomosis, although under a variety of aortic manipulations, may contribute to the improved long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds:  One of the strategies to prevent stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be the use of a device for proximal anastomosis without partial clamp of the ascending aorta.

Methods:  We retrospectively investigated early and late outcomes in consecutive 881 patients undergoing isolated CABG using Heartstring for proximal anastomosis from January 2008 to December 2022, to reveal the validity to use it. All patients underwent preoperative imaging workups to evaluate neurovascular atherosclerosis.

Results:  The mean age of the patients was 68.9 years, 20% were female and 13% had previous history of stroke. CABG was on-pump beating heart (52.2%) or off-pump (47.8%) with a mean number of distal anastomoses of 3.38 ± 0.93, using 1.62 ± 0.53 Heartstring devices under different aortic manipulations. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% and perioperative stroke rate was 0.9%, none of them died during hospital stay. During the follow-up period of 70 ± 47 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were 86 and 66%, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)-free rates were 86 and 70% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, risk factors for late death included male, previous history of stroke, postoperative sternomediastinitis, late new-onset stroke, and MACCEs, but did not include the perioperative stroke.

Conclusion:  Low stroke rate, as low as 0.9%, after CABG using Heartstring for proximal anastomosis, although under a variety of aortic manipulations, may contribute to the improved long-term prognosis.

使用心弦装置的 881 例冠状动脉旁路移植患者的疗效。
背景:预防冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后中风的策略之一可能是使用一种无需部分钳夹升主动脉的近端吻合装置:我们回顾性调查了2008年1月至2022年12月期间连续881例使用Heartstring进行近端吻合的孤立CABG患者的早期和晚期预后,以揭示使用Heartstring的有效性。所有患者术前均接受了影像学检查,以评估神经血管粥样硬化:患者平均年龄为 68.9 岁,20% 为女性,13% 曾有中风病史。CABG采用泵上心脏跳动(52.2%)或泵外心脏跳动(47.8%),在不同的主动脉操作下使用1.62±0.53个心弦装置,远端吻合的平均数量为3.38±0.93个。院内死亡率为 2.0%,围手术期卒中率为 0.9%,无一人在住院期间死亡。在70个月 ± 47个月的随访期间,总精算存活率分别为86%和66%,5年和10年无重大心脑血管不良事件(MACCEs)发生率分别为86%和70%。多变量分析显示,晚期死亡的风险因素包括男性、既往中风史、术后胸锁乳突炎、晚期新发中风和MACCEs,但不包括围手术期中风:结论:使用心弦进行近端吻合的 CABG 术后卒中率低至 0.9%,尽管主动脉操作多种多样,但这可能有助于改善长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信