Impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary lesion complexity on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Coronary artery disease Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001386
Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Aleksander Dokollari, Roberto Rodriguez, Eric M Gnall, Paul M Coady, Harish Jarrett, Sandra V Abramson, Katie M Hawthorne, Scott M Goldman, William A Gray, Basel Ramlawi
{"title":"Impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary lesion complexity on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Aleksander Dokollari, Roberto Rodriguez, Eric M Gnall, Paul M Coady, Harish Jarrett, Sandra V Abramson, Katie M Hawthorne, Scott M Goldman, William A Gray, Basel Ramlawi","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and coronary lesion complexity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes for aortic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical outcomes of TAVR were retrospectively compared between patients with and without prior CABG, and between patients with prior CABG and without coronary artery disease (CAD). The impact of the CABG SYNTAX score was also evaluated in patients with prior CABG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1042 patients with a median age and follow-up of 82 years and 25 (range: 0-72) months, respectively. Of these, 175 patients had a history of CABG, while 401 were free of CAD. Patients with prior CABG were more likely to be male and had higher rates of diabetes, peripheral artery disease and atrial fibrillation compared with patients without prior CABG. After 2 : 1 propensity score matching, all-cause mortality ( P  = 0.17) and the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and coronary intervention ( P  = 0.16) were similar between patients with (n = 166) and without (n = 304) prior CABG. A 1 : 1 propensity score-matched analysis, however, showed lower rates of all-cause mortality ( P  = 0.04) and the composite outcome ( P  = 0.04) in patients with prior CABG (n = 134) compared with patients without CAD (n = 134). The median CABG SYNTAX score was 16 (interquartile range: 9.0-23), which was not associated with better/worse clinical outcomes in patients with prior CABG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior CABG may positively affect mid-term TAVR outcomes for aortic stenosis compared with no CAD when adjusted for other comorbidities. The CABG SYNTAX score did not influence the prognosis after TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"547-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and coronary lesion complexity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes for aortic stenosis.

Methods: Clinical outcomes of TAVR were retrospectively compared between patients with and without prior CABG, and between patients with prior CABG and without coronary artery disease (CAD). The impact of the CABG SYNTAX score was also evaluated in patients with prior CABG.

Results: The study included 1042 patients with a median age and follow-up of 82 years and 25 (range: 0-72) months, respectively. Of these, 175 patients had a history of CABG, while 401 were free of CAD. Patients with prior CABG were more likely to be male and had higher rates of diabetes, peripheral artery disease and atrial fibrillation compared with patients without prior CABG. After 2 : 1 propensity score matching, all-cause mortality ( P  = 0.17) and the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and coronary intervention ( P  = 0.16) were similar between patients with (n = 166) and without (n = 304) prior CABG. A 1 : 1 propensity score-matched analysis, however, showed lower rates of all-cause mortality ( P  = 0.04) and the composite outcome ( P  = 0.04) in patients with prior CABG (n = 134) compared with patients without CAD (n = 134). The median CABG SYNTAX score was 16 (interquartile range: 9.0-23), which was not associated with better/worse clinical outcomes in patients with prior CABG.

Conclusion: Prior CABG may positively affect mid-term TAVR outcomes for aortic stenosis compared with no CAD when adjusted for other comorbidities. The CABG SYNTAX score did not influence the prognosis after TAVR.

既往冠状动脉旁路移植术和冠状动脉病变复杂性对经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄疗效的影响。
目的研究既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和冠状动脉病变复杂性对主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)疗效的影响:对既往接受过 CABG 手术和未接受过 CABG 手术的患者,以及既往接受过 CABG 手术和未患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者的 TAVR 临床疗效进行了回顾性比较。还评估了 CABG SYNTAX 评分对既往接受过 CABG 患者的影响:研究共纳入 1042 名患者,中位年龄为 82 岁,随访时间为 25 个月(范围:0-72 个月)。其中,175 名患者有 CABG 病史,401 名患者无 CAD。与未接受过心脏搭桥术的患者相比,曾接受过心脏搭桥术的患者更可能是男性,糖尿病、外周动脉疾病和心房颤动的发病率也更高。经过 2 :经过 2 : 1 倾向评分匹配后,既往接受过 CABG 手术的患者(166 人)与未接受过 CABG 手术的患者(304 人)的全因死亡率(P = 0.17)以及全因死亡率、中风和冠状动脉介入治疗的复合死亡率(P = 0.16)相似。A 1 :然而,1:1倾向得分匹配分析显示,与无 CAD 患者(n = 134)相比,既往接受过 CABG 患者(n = 134)的全因死亡率(P = 0.04)和综合结果(P = 0.04)更低。CABG SYNTAX评分的中位数为16分(四分位间范围:9.0-23分),这与既往接受过CABG的患者临床预后的好坏无关:结论:在对其他合并症进行调整后,与无 CAD 患者相比,既往接受过 CABG 的患者可能会对主动脉瓣狭窄的 TAVR 中期预后产生积极影响。CABG SYNTAX评分不会影响TAVR术后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信