Association Between FEV₁ Decline Rate and Mortality in Long-Term Follow-Up of a 21-Patient Pilot Clinical Trial of Inhaled Liposomal Cyclosporine Plus Standard-of-Care Versus Standard-of-Care Alone for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung Transplantation.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Aldo Iacono, Marniker Wijesinha, Andreas Völp, Maksim Korotun, Michael Terrin
{"title":"Association Between FEV₁ Decline Rate and Mortality in Long-Term Follow-Up of a 21-Patient Pilot Clinical Trial of Inhaled Liposomal Cyclosporine Plus Standard-of-Care Versus Standard-of-Care Alone for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung Transplantation.","authors":"Aldo Iacono, Marniker Wijesinha, Andreas Völp, Maksim Korotun, Michael Terrin","doi":"10.12659/AOT.942823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The association between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) trajectory and mortality in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is not well defined. Using long-term data from a prior clinical trial of inhaled liposomal cyclosporine A (L-CsA-I) for lung transplant patients with BOS, this study examined the association between longitudinal FEV₁ change and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed long-term data from a clinical trial which randomized 21 patients with BOS (³20% decrease in FEV1 from personal maximum) to receive L-CsA-I plus standard-of-care (n=11) or standard-of-care (SOC) alone (n=10) for 24 weeks. A joint statistical model, combining a linear mixed model for FEV₁ change and Cox regression for mortality, was utilized to examine the overall association between FEV₁ trajectory and mortality during follow-up. RESULTS The 21 trial participants (10 single, 11 double lung recipients) had a mean FEV₁ of 1.7±0.6 Liters at randomization. Median follow-up post-randomization was 35 months. In joint model analysis, 1 percent FEV₁ decline predicted 1.076-fold increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval: -0.998 to 1.160, p=0.058). FEV₁ decline was reduced by 2.6% per year in L-CsA-I patients compared to SOC (p=0.210), and overall survival at 1/3/5 years was 91%/64%/27% vs 90%/20%/0% for L-CsA-I versus SOC, respectively (p=0.164). CONCLUSIONS In BOS patients, greater longitudinal FEV₁ decline predicts increased mortality. Trends towards prolonged stabilization of FEV₁ and improved survival were observed with L-CsA-I receipt. Further analyses will aid in evaluating the utility of FEV₁ change as a survival predictor, having implications in BOS management and future trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.942823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The association between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) trajectory and mortality in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is not well defined. Using long-term data from a prior clinical trial of inhaled liposomal cyclosporine A (L-CsA-I) for lung transplant patients with BOS, this study examined the association between longitudinal FEV₁ change and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed long-term data from a clinical trial which randomized 21 patients with BOS (³20% decrease in FEV1 from personal maximum) to receive L-CsA-I plus standard-of-care (n=11) or standard-of-care (SOC) alone (n=10) for 24 weeks. A joint statistical model, combining a linear mixed model for FEV₁ change and Cox regression for mortality, was utilized to examine the overall association between FEV₁ trajectory and mortality during follow-up. RESULTS The 21 trial participants (10 single, 11 double lung recipients) had a mean FEV₁ of 1.7±0.6 Liters at randomization. Median follow-up post-randomization was 35 months. In joint model analysis, 1 percent FEV₁ decline predicted 1.076-fold increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval: -0.998 to 1.160, p=0.058). FEV₁ decline was reduced by 2.6% per year in L-CsA-I patients compared to SOC (p=0.210), and overall survival at 1/3/5 years was 91%/64%/27% vs 90%/20%/0% for L-CsA-I versus SOC, respectively (p=0.164). CONCLUSIONS In BOS patients, greater longitudinal FEV₁ decline predicts increased mortality. Trends towards prolonged stabilization of FEV₁ and improved survival were observed with L-CsA-I receipt. Further analyses will aid in evaluating the utility of FEV₁ change as a survival predictor, having implications in BOS management and future trial design.

肺移植术后支气管炎闭塞综合征吸入脂质体环孢素加标准护理与单用标准护理的 21 例患者试点临床试验的长期随访中,FEV₁ 下降率与死亡率之间的关系。
背景 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)变化轨迹与支气管炎闭塞综合征(BOS)死亡率之间的关系尚未明确。本研究利用之前针对 BOS 肺移植患者的吸入性脂质体环孢素 A(L-CsA-I)临床试验的长期数据,研究了 FEV₁纵向变化与死亡率之间的关系。材料和方法 我们分析了一项临床试验的长期数据,该试验随机抽取了 21 名 BOS 患者(FEV1 从个人最大值下降 ³20%),让他们接受 L-CsA-I 加标准护理(11 人)或单用标准护理(SOC)(10 人),为期 24 周。采用线性混合模型(FEV₁ 变化)和 Cox 回归(死亡率)相结合的联合统计模型,研究随访期间 FEV₁轨迹与死亡率之间的总体关系。结果 21 名试验参与者(10 名单肺受者,11 名双肺受者)在随机化时的平均 FEV₁ 为 1.7±0.6 升。随机化后的中位随访时间为 35 个月。在联合模型分析中,FEV₁下降1%预示死亡风险增加1.076倍(95%置信区间:-0.998至1.160,P=0.058)。与 SOC 相比,L-CsA-I 患者的 FEV₁ 下降率每年降低 2.6%(p=0.210),L-CsA-I 与 SOC 的 1/3/5 年总生存率分别为 91%/64%/27% 与 90%/20%/0% (p=0.164)。结论 在 BOS 患者中,FEV₁ 的纵向下降幅度越大,预示着死亡率越高。接受 L-CsA-I 治疗后,FEV₁ 稳定时间延长,生存率提高。进一步的分析将有助于评估 FEV₁变化作为生存预测指标的效用,对 BOS 的管理和未来的试验设计具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信