Micro–Macro Behavior of CBM Extraction in Multi-well Mining Projects

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dayu Ye, Guannan Liu, Xiang Lin, Hu Liu, Feng Gao
{"title":"Micro–Macro Behavior of CBM Extraction in Multi-well Mining Projects","authors":"Dayu Ye, Guannan Liu, Xiang Lin, Hu Liu, Feng Gao","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10347-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-well extraction is a prevalent technique in coalbed methane (CBM) recovery projects. Although numerous studies have extensively explored aspects such as well spacing, the degree of multi-well pumping, and well count, the dynamics of fracture microstructure evolution in proximity to wells—particularly in inter-well regions—remain inadequately understood in relation to the effects of multi-well mining project. This research delved into the multi-well extraction methodology employed in CBM recovery endeavors, aiming to elucidate the development of the fracture microstructure network. We introduce a novel, interdisciplinary, and integrative research framework that amalgamates the multi-field coupling effects observed during the multi-well extraction process with fractal theory. This model has been validated, and it facilitates the examination of changes in fracture micro-evolution subjected to multi-well extraction. Additionally, this study investigated alterations in fracture characteristics, seam stress, and CBM pressure within sensitive zones (i.e., inter-well spaces and adjacent areas) under varying extraction pressures. Following a 180-day extraction period, the findings indicate a significant reduction in gas pressure by 83.9% for the extraction wells and the nearby areas, alongside a decrease in fracture network length by 10.94% and density by 5.04%. Compared to existing models for assessing multi-well CBM extraction, our interdisciplinary model demonstrates considerable analytical superiority. Notably, when the fractal parameters <i>D</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> and <i>D</i><sub><i>Tf</i></sub>, which characterize fracture density and tortuosity quantitatively, increase from 1.2 to 1.8, the residual gas pressure is reduced further by 11.6% and increased further by 3.9%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10347-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-well extraction is a prevalent technique in coalbed methane (CBM) recovery projects. Although numerous studies have extensively explored aspects such as well spacing, the degree of multi-well pumping, and well count, the dynamics of fracture microstructure evolution in proximity to wells—particularly in inter-well regions—remain inadequately understood in relation to the effects of multi-well mining project. This research delved into the multi-well extraction methodology employed in CBM recovery endeavors, aiming to elucidate the development of the fracture microstructure network. We introduce a novel, interdisciplinary, and integrative research framework that amalgamates the multi-field coupling effects observed during the multi-well extraction process with fractal theory. This model has been validated, and it facilitates the examination of changes in fracture micro-evolution subjected to multi-well extraction. Additionally, this study investigated alterations in fracture characteristics, seam stress, and CBM pressure within sensitive zones (i.e., inter-well spaces and adjacent areas) under varying extraction pressures. Following a 180-day extraction period, the findings indicate a significant reduction in gas pressure by 83.9% for the extraction wells and the nearby areas, alongside a decrease in fracture network length by 10.94% and density by 5.04%. Compared to existing models for assessing multi-well CBM extraction, our interdisciplinary model demonstrates considerable analytical superiority. Notably, when the fractal parameters Df and DTf, which characterize fracture density and tortuosity quantitatively, increase from 1.2 to 1.8, the residual gas pressure is reduced further by 11.6% and increased further by 3.9%, respectively.

Abstract Image

多井开采项目中煤层气抽采的微观-宏观行为
多井抽采是煤层气(CBM)采收项目中的一种普遍技术。尽管大量研究对井距、多井抽采程度和井数等方面进行了广泛探讨,但对于多井开采项目的影响,人们对井附近(尤其是井间区域)断裂微结构的动态演化仍然了解不足。本研究深入探讨了煤层气开采中采用的多井开采方法,旨在阐明裂缝微结构网络的发展。我们引入了一个新颖的跨学科综合研究框架,将多井抽采过程中观察到的多场耦合效应与分形理论相结合。该模型已经过验证,有助于研究多井抽采过程中断裂微观演化的变化。此外,这项研究还调查了在不同抽采压力下敏感区域(即井间空间和邻近区域)的断裂特征、缝隙应力和煤层气压力的变化。经过 180 天的抽采期,研究结果表明抽采井及附近区域的天然气压力显著降低了 83.9%,同时裂缝网络长度减少了 10.94%,密度减少了 5.04%。与现有的多井煤层气抽采评估模型相比,我们的跨学科模型在分析上具有相当大的优势。值得注意的是,当定量表征裂缝密度和曲折度的分形参数 Df 和 DTf 从 1.2 增加到 1.8 时,残余气体压力分别进一步降低了 11.6%和增加了 3.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信