Risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia among diabetic patients: A derivation and validation study

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.13062
Martin CS Wong, Eman YM Leung, Harry HX Wang, Junjie Huang
{"title":"Risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia among diabetic patients: A derivation and validation study","authors":"Martin CS Wong,&nbsp;Eman YM Leung,&nbsp;Harry HX Wang,&nbsp;Junjie Huang","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.13062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. This study devises and validates a clinical scoring system for risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) to guide colonoscopy evaluation among diabetic patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 55 964 diabetic patients who received colonoscopies from a large database in a Chinese population (2008–2018). We recruited a derivation cohort based on random sampling. The risk factors of CRC evaluated by univariate analysis were examined for ACN, defined as advanced adenoma, CRC, or any combination thereof using binary logistic regression analysis. We used the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for independent risk factors to devise a risk score, ranging from 0 to 6: 0–4 “average risk” (AR) and 5–6 “high risk” (HR). The other subjects acted as an independent validation cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of ACN in both the derivation and validation cohorts was 2.0%. Using the scoring system constructed, 78.5% and 21.5% of patients in the validation cohort were classified as AR and HR, respectively. The prevalence of ACN in the AR and HR groups was 1.5% and 4.1%, respectively. Individuals in the HR group had a 2.78-fold increased prevalence of ACN than the AR group. The concordance (c-) statistics was 0.70, implying a good discriminatory capability of the risk score to stratify high-risk individuals who should consider colonoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical risk scoring system based on age, gender, smoking, presence of hypertension, and use of aspirin is useful for ACN risk prediction among diabetic patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.13062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. This study devises and validates a clinical scoring system for risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) to guide colonoscopy evaluation among diabetic patients.

Methods

We identified 55 964 diabetic patients who received colonoscopies from a large database in a Chinese population (2008–2018). We recruited a derivation cohort based on random sampling. The risk factors of CRC evaluated by univariate analysis were examined for ACN, defined as advanced adenoma, CRC, or any combination thereof using binary logistic regression analysis. We used the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for independent risk factors to devise a risk score, ranging from 0 to 6: 0–4 “average risk” (AR) and 5–6 “high risk” (HR). The other subjects acted as an independent validation cohort.

Results

The prevalence of ACN in both the derivation and validation cohorts was 2.0%. Using the scoring system constructed, 78.5% and 21.5% of patients in the validation cohort were classified as AR and HR, respectively. The prevalence of ACN in the AR and HR groups was 1.5% and 4.1%, respectively. Individuals in the HR group had a 2.78-fold increased prevalence of ACN than the AR group. The concordance (c-) statistics was 0.70, implying a good discriminatory capability of the risk score to stratify high-risk individuals who should consider colonoscopy.

Conclusion

The clinical risk scoring system based on age, gender, smoking, presence of hypertension, and use of aspirin is useful for ACN risk prediction among diabetic patients.

Abstract Image

糖尿病患者的晚期结直肠肿瘤风险预测:推导和验证研究
背景和目的 大肠癌(CRC)是全球第三大常见癌症。本研究设计并验证了晚期结直肠肿瘤(ACN)风险预测的临床评分系统,以指导糖尿病患者的结肠镜检查评估。 方法 我们从中国人群的大型数据库(2008-2018 年)中确定了 55 964 名接受结肠镜检查的糖尿病患者。我们通过随机抽样招募了一个衍生队列。通过二元逻辑回归分析,对单变量分析评估的 CRC 风险因素进行了 ACN 检验,ACN 被定义为晚期腺瘤、CRC 或两者的任意组合。我们使用独立风险因素的调整后几率比(aORs)来设计风险评分,评分范围从 0 到 6:0-4 分为 "一般风险"(AR),5-6 分为 "高风险"(HR)。其他受试者作为独立的验证队列。 结果 ACN 在推导组群和验证组群中的发病率均为 2.0%。使用所构建的评分系统,验证队列中分别有 78.5% 和 21.5% 的患者被归类为 AR 和 HR。AR组和HR组的ACN发病率分别为1.5%和4.1%。HR组患者的ACN患病率是AR组的2.78倍。一致性(c-)统计值为 0.70,这意味着该风险评分具有很好的区分能力,可对应考虑进行结肠镜检查的高危人群进行分层。 结论 基于年龄、性别、吸烟、是否患有高血压以及是否服用阿司匹林的临床风险评分系统有助于预测糖尿病患者的 ACN 风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信