Nursing Student Perception of Different Simulation Methodologies Applied to Help First-Year Students Integrate Knowledge Acquired: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Olga Masot RN, PhD , Elena Paraíso-Pueyo RN, PhD , Ana Lavedán-Santamaría RN, PhD , Teresa Botigué RN, PhD , Laia Selva-Pareja PhD , Eva Barallat-Gimeno RN, PhD , Rosa Mar Alzuria-Alós RN, PhD , Anna Espart RN, PhD
{"title":"Nursing Student Perception of Different Simulation Methodologies Applied to Help First-Year Students Integrate Knowledge Acquired: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Olga Masot RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Elena Paraíso-Pueyo RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Ana Lavedán-Santamaría RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Teresa Botigué RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Laia Selva-Pareja PhD ,&nbsp;Eva Barallat-Gimeno RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Rosa Mar Alzuria-Alós RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Espart RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Standardized patient simulations are an effective method for acquiring skills and knowledge. The purpose of this study was to explore nursing students' perceptions of the learning methods used in clinical simulation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted evaluating two different clinical simulations: 1) basic simulations, where the actor/patient was the teacher, the simulations were performed in pairs, and the rest of the students were present in the same classroom; and 2) simulation-based peer-assisted learning, where the actors/patients were third-year students, the simulations were performed individually, and the rest of the students watched them from another classroom via a video recording system.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In terms of their perceptions, both types of simulation scored 4.4 out of 5 on the Student Perception of Clinical Simulation tool (SD ±0.7 and ±0.8, respectively). In addition, the results of the characteristics of each simulation are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Basic simulations helped students to internalize theoretical knowledge and gain confidence. Peer-assisted learning based on simulations increased their self-confidence and ability to predict clinical changes in patients. As a result, they felt better prepared to care for real patients. The use of both simulation modalities is a flexible method that can be adapted to educational needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000409/pdfft?md5=3479a825b022945b2a499b694d25586d&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000409-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standardized patient simulations are an effective method for acquiring skills and knowledge. The purpose of this study was to explore nursing students' perceptions of the learning methods used in clinical simulation.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted evaluating two different clinical simulations: 1) basic simulations, where the actor/patient was the teacher, the simulations were performed in pairs, and the rest of the students were present in the same classroom; and 2) simulation-based peer-assisted learning, where the actors/patients were third-year students, the simulations were performed individually, and the rest of the students watched them from another classroom via a video recording system.

Results

In terms of their perceptions, both types of simulation scored 4.4 out of 5 on the Student Perception of Clinical Simulation tool (SD ±0.7 and ±0.8, respectively). In addition, the results of the characteristics of each simulation are presented.

Conclusions

Basic simulations helped students to internalize theoretical knowledge and gain confidence. Peer-assisted learning based on simulations increased their self-confidence and ability to predict clinical changes in patients. As a result, they felt better prepared to care for real patients. The use of both simulation modalities is a flexible method that can be adapted to educational needs.

护理专业学生对用于帮助一年级学生整合所学知识的不同模拟方法的看法:横断面研究
背景标准化的病人模拟是获取技能和知识的有效方法。本研究旨在探讨护理专业学生对临床模拟中使用的学习方法的看法:1)基本模拟,即演员/患者为教师,模拟以两人一组的形式进行,其余学生在同一间教室;2)基于模拟的同伴辅助学习,即演员/患者为三年级学生,模拟以个人形式进行,其余学生通过视频录制系统在另一间教室观看。结论 基础模拟有助于学生内化理论知识并获得自信。基于模拟的同伴互助学习增强了学生的自信心和预测病人临床变化的能力。因此,他们感觉为护理真实病人做好了更充分的准备。使用这两种模拟模式是一种灵活的方法,可以适应教学需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信