Substance use stigma: A systematic review of measures and their psychometric properties

Angelica Spata , Ishita Gupta , M. Kati Lear , Karsten Lunze , Jason B. Luoma
{"title":"Substance use stigma: A systematic review of measures and their psychometric properties","authors":"Angelica Spata ,&nbsp;Ishita Gupta ,&nbsp;M. Kati Lear ,&nbsp;Karsten Lunze ,&nbsp;Jason B. Luoma","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Instruments to measure substance use stigma are emerging, however little is known regarding their psychometric properties. While research has evolved to view substance use stigma as a context sensitive international phenomenon that is embedded within cultures, validated self-report measures are lacking and comprehensive reviews of the existing measures are extremely limited. In this systematic review of substance use stigma and shame measures, we aim to contextualize results from existing research, lay the groundwork for future measurement development research, and provide a thorough resource for research scientists currently designing studies to measure substance use stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched three databases using Boolean search terms for psychometric evaluations of measures of substance use stigma and shame and evaluated the quality/psychometric properties using an adaptation of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 18 measures of substance use stigma. Overall, most measures had minimal psychometric assessments and none of the measures met all domains of the COSMIN measure quality criteria. However, most studies reported satisfactory factor analyses and internal consistency scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most measures of substance use stigma and shame had psychometric assessment across a limited range of criteria and no measures of structural substance use stigma were found. The most reported psychometric properties were structural validity and convergent validity. We suggest future researchers investigate test-retest reliability and cross-cultural validity for existing substance use stigma measures, as well as develop and evaluate novel measures assessing structural stigma of substance use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000210/pdfft?md5=d8a85beda8215dbade4df4b6d23e10f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2772724624000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Instruments to measure substance use stigma are emerging, however little is known regarding their psychometric properties. While research has evolved to view substance use stigma as a context sensitive international phenomenon that is embedded within cultures, validated self-report measures are lacking and comprehensive reviews of the existing measures are extremely limited. In this systematic review of substance use stigma and shame measures, we aim to contextualize results from existing research, lay the groundwork for future measurement development research, and provide a thorough resource for research scientists currently designing studies to measure substance use stigma.

Methods

We searched three databases using Boolean search terms for psychometric evaluations of measures of substance use stigma and shame and evaluated the quality/psychometric properties using an adaptation of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review guidelines.

Results

We identified 18 measures of substance use stigma. Overall, most measures had minimal psychometric assessments and none of the measures met all domains of the COSMIN measure quality criteria. However, most studies reported satisfactory factor analyses and internal consistency scores.

Conclusions

Most measures of substance use stigma and shame had psychometric assessment across a limited range of criteria and no measures of structural substance use stigma were found. The most reported psychometric properties were structural validity and convergent validity. We suggest future researchers investigate test-retest reliability and cross-cultural validity for existing substance use stigma measures, as well as develop and evaluate novel measures assessing structural stigma of substance use.

药物使用耻辱感:对测量方法及其心理测量特性的系统回顾
背景用于测量药物使用耻辱感的工具不断涌现,但人们对这些工具的心理测量特性知之甚少。虽然研究已逐渐将药物使用羞辱视为一种对环境敏感的国际现象,并将其嵌入文化之中,但却缺乏经过验证的自我报告测量方法,对现有测量方法的全面回顾也极为有限。在这篇关于药物使用耻辱感和羞耻感测量方法的系统性综述中,我们旨在对现有研究结果进行背景分析,为未来的测量开发研究奠定基础,并为目前正在设计药物使用耻辱感测量方法的研究科学家提供全面的资源。方法我们使用布尔检索词检索了三个数据库中有关药物使用耻辱感和羞耻感测量方法的心理测量学评估,并使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)系统性审查指南进行了质量/心理测量学特性评估。总体而言,大多数测量方法的心理测量学评估都很有限,没有一种测量方法符合 COSMIN 测量质量标准的所有领域。然而,大多数研究都报告了令人满意的因子分析和内部一致性得分。结论大多数药物使用耻辱感和羞耻感测量方法的心理测量评估标准范围有限,没有发现结构性药物使用耻辱感测量方法。报告最多的心理测量特性是结构效度和收敛效度。我们建议未来的研究人员调查现有物质使用耻辱感测量方法的测试再测试可靠性和跨文化有效性,并开发和评估评估物质使用结构耻辱感的新型测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信