Structural covariance, topological organization, and volumetric features of amygdala subnuclei in posttraumatic stress disorder

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Elizabeth M. Haris , Richard A. Bryant , Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar
{"title":"Structural covariance, topological organization, and volumetric features of amygdala subnuclei in posttraumatic stress disorder","authors":"Elizabeth M. Haris ,&nbsp;Richard A. Bryant ,&nbsp;Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The amygdala is divided into functional subnuclei which have been challenging to investigate due to functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) limitations in mapping small neural structures. Hence their role in the neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains poorly understood. Examination of covariance of structural MRI measures could be an alternate approach to circumvent this issue. T1-weighted anatomical scans from a 3 T scanner from non-trauma-exposed controls (NEC; n = 71, 75 % female) and PTSD participants (n = 67, 69 % female) were parcellated into 105 brain regions. Pearson’s <em>r</em> partial correlations were computed for three and nine bilateral amygdala subnuclei and every other brain region, corrected for age, sex, and total brain volume. Pairwise correlation comparisons were performed to examine subnuclei covariance profiles between-groups. Graph theory was employed to investigate subnuclei network topology. Volumetric measures were compared to investigate structural changes.</p><p>We found differences between amygdala subnuclei in covariance with the hippocampus for both groups, and additionally with temporal brain regions for the PTSD group. Network topology demonstrated the importance of the right basal nucleus in facilitating network communication only in PTSD. There were no between-group differences for any of the three structural metrics. These findings are in line with previous work that has failed to find structural differences for amygdala subnuclei between PTSD and controls. However, differences between amygdala subnuclei covariance profiles observed in our study highlight the need to investigate amygdala subnuclei functional connectivity in PTSD using higher field strength fMRI for better spatial resolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000585/pdfft?md5=8f31737373f39e04bf0b2b139e95eae9&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000585-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The amygdala is divided into functional subnuclei which have been challenging to investigate due to functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) limitations in mapping small neural structures. Hence their role in the neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains poorly understood. Examination of covariance of structural MRI measures could be an alternate approach to circumvent this issue. T1-weighted anatomical scans from a 3 T scanner from non-trauma-exposed controls (NEC; n = 71, 75 % female) and PTSD participants (n = 67, 69 % female) were parcellated into 105 brain regions. Pearson’s r partial correlations were computed for three and nine bilateral amygdala subnuclei and every other brain region, corrected for age, sex, and total brain volume. Pairwise correlation comparisons were performed to examine subnuclei covariance profiles between-groups. Graph theory was employed to investigate subnuclei network topology. Volumetric measures were compared to investigate structural changes.

We found differences between amygdala subnuclei in covariance with the hippocampus for both groups, and additionally with temporal brain regions for the PTSD group. Network topology demonstrated the importance of the right basal nucleus in facilitating network communication only in PTSD. There were no between-group differences for any of the three structural metrics. These findings are in line with previous work that has failed to find structural differences for amygdala subnuclei between PTSD and controls. However, differences between amygdala subnuclei covariance profiles observed in our study highlight the need to investigate amygdala subnuclei functional connectivity in PTSD using higher field strength fMRI for better spatial resolution.

创伤后应激障碍患者杏仁核亚核的结构协方差、拓扑组织和体积特征
杏仁核分为多个功能性亚核,由于功能性磁共振成像(MRI)在绘制小型神经结构图时存在局限性,因此对这些亚核进行研究具有挑战性。因此,人们对它们在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)神经生物学中的作用仍然知之甚少。检查核磁共振成像结构测量的协方差可能是规避这一问题的另一种方法。通过 3 T 扫描仪对非创伤暴露对照组(NEC;n = 71,75 % 为女性)和创伤后应激障碍参与者(n = 67,69 % 为女性)进行 T1 加权解剖扫描,将其划分为 105 个脑区。计算了 3 个和 9 个双侧杏仁核亚核与其他脑区的皮尔逊 r 部分相关性,并对年龄、性别和脑总量进行了校正。进行了配对相关比较,以检查组间亚核的协方差概况。采用图论研究亚核网络拓扑结构。我们发现两组杏仁核亚核与海马的协方差存在差异,创伤后应激障碍组的杏仁核亚核与颞叶脑区的协方差也存在差异。网络拓扑显示,只有创伤后应激障碍组的右侧基底核在促进网络交流方面具有重要作用。三项结构指标均无组间差异。这些发现与之前的研究结果一致,即创伤后应激障碍组和对照组之间的杏仁核亚核在结构上没有差异。然而,在我们的研究中观察到的杏仁核亚核协方差曲线之间的差异凸显了研究创伤后应激障碍中杏仁核亚核功能连接的必要性,即使用更高场强度的fMRI来获得更好的空间分辨率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信