Distinct autoantibody profiles across checkpoint inhibitor types and toxicities.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Oncoimmunology Pub Date : 2024-05-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2162402X.2024.2351255
Hong Mu-Mosley, Mitchell S von Itzstein, Farjana Fattah, Jialiang Liu, Chengsong Zhu, Yang Xie, Edward K Wakeland, Jason Y Park, Brad S Kahl, Catherine S Diefenbach, David E Gerber
{"title":"Distinct autoantibody profiles across checkpoint inhibitor types and toxicities.","authors":"Hong Mu-Mosley, Mitchell S von Itzstein, Farjana Fattah, Jialiang Liu, Chengsong Zhu, Yang Xie, Edward K Wakeland, Jason Y Park, Brad S Kahl, Catherine S Diefenbach, David E Gerber","doi":"10.1080/2162402X.2024.2351255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used in combination. To understand the effects of different ICI categories, we characterized changes in circulating autoantibodies in patients enrolled in the E4412 trial (NCT01896999) of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ipilimumab, BV plus nivolumab, or BV plus ipilimumab-nivolumab for Hodgkin Lymphoma. Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) autoantibody levels were compared to pre-treatment baseline. Across 112 autoantibodies tested, we generally observed increases in ipilimumab-containing regimens, with decreases noted in the nivolumab arm. Among 15 autoantibodies with significant changes at C2D1, all nivolumab cases exhibited decreases, with more than 90% of ipilimumab-exposed cases showing increases. Autoantibody profiles also showed differences according to immune-related adverse event (irAE) type, with rash generally featuring increases and liver toxicity demonstrating decreases. We conclude that dynamic autoantibody profiles may differ according to ICI category and irAE type. These findings may have relevance to clinical monitoring and irAE treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48714,"journal":{"name":"Oncoimmunology","volume":"13 1","pages":"2351255"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11085965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncoimmunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2024.2351255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used in combination. To understand the effects of different ICI categories, we characterized changes in circulating autoantibodies in patients enrolled in the E4412 trial (NCT01896999) of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ipilimumab, BV plus nivolumab, or BV plus ipilimumab-nivolumab for Hodgkin Lymphoma. Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) autoantibody levels were compared to pre-treatment baseline. Across 112 autoantibodies tested, we generally observed increases in ipilimumab-containing regimens, with decreases noted in the nivolumab arm. Among 15 autoantibodies with significant changes at C2D1, all nivolumab cases exhibited decreases, with more than 90% of ipilimumab-exposed cases showing increases. Autoantibody profiles also showed differences according to immune-related adverse event (irAE) type, with rash generally featuring increases and liver toxicity demonstrating decreases. We conclude that dynamic autoantibody profiles may differ according to ICI category and irAE type. These findings may have relevance to clinical monitoring and irAE treatment.

不同检查点抑制剂类型和毒性的自身抗体特征各不相同。
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)越来越多地被联合使用。为了了解不同ICI类别的效果,我们对参加布伦妥西单抗韦多汀(BV)联合伊匹单抗、BV联合尼伐单抗或BV联合伊匹单抗-尼伐单抗治疗霍奇金淋巴瘤的E4412试验(NCT01896999)的患者的循环自身抗体变化进行了描述。第2周期第1天(C2D1)自身抗体水平与治疗前基线进行了比较。在检测的112种自身抗体中,我们普遍观察到含有伊匹单抗的方案中自身抗体水平升高,而nivolumab方案中自身抗体水平降低。在C2D1发生显著变化的15种自身抗体中,所有的nivolumab病例都出现了下降,而超过90%的ipilimumab暴露病例则出现了上升。免疫相关不良事件(irAE)类型不同,自身抗体谱也有差异,皮疹通常会增加,而肝毒性则会减少。我们的结论是,动态自身抗体谱可能因 ICI 类别和 irAE 类型而异。这些发现可能与临床监测和 irAE 治疗有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncoimmunology
Oncoimmunology ONCOLOGYIMMUNOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
276
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: OncoImmunology is a dynamic, high-profile, open access journal that comprehensively covers tumor immunology and immunotherapy. As cancer immunotherapy advances, OncoImmunology is committed to publishing top-tier research encompassing all facets of basic and applied tumor immunology. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: -Basic and translational studies in immunology of both solid and hematological malignancies -Inflammation, innate and acquired immune responses against cancer -Mechanisms of cancer immunoediting and immune evasion -Modern immunotherapies, including immunomodulators, immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell, NK-cell, and macrophage engagers, and CAR T cells -Immunological effects of conventional anticancer therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信