Infodemic and sources of information about COVID-19 in a Brazilian population: what are the associated factors?

Q2 Social Sciences
Micaela Rabelo Quadra, Antônio Augusto Schäfer, Elisabete Borges Maciel, Bianca Languer Vargas, Luiza Amorim Saraiva Schlemper, Sofia Garbin Petry, Fernanda Oliveira Meller
{"title":"Infodemic and sources of information about COVID-19 in a Brazilian population: what are the associated factors?","authors":"Micaela Rabelo Quadra, Antônio Augusto Schäfer, Elisabete Borges Maciel, Bianca Languer Vargas, Luiza Amorim Saraiva Schlemper, Sofia Garbin Petry, Fernanda Oliveira Meller","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2024.2352982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation, and information search have increased dramatically. This increased search for information about the Coronavirus, called infodemic, was greatly affected by fake news and information without scientific evidence. This article aimed to assess the infodemic amid the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with sociodemographic and pandemic-related variables, as well as describe the main sources from which people obtained information about COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional population-based study was performed in Criciúma, Brazil. All individuals aged 18 years or older, residing in the 607 households systematically selected, were invited to answer the questionnaire. Infodemic and sources to seek information about COVID-19 were evaluated, as well as sociodemographic and pandemic-related variables. Adjusted Poisson regression with robust variance was used to evaluate associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 863 individuals participated in the study. The prevalence of infodemic was 22.1%, and television was the main source of information (58.9%). Three groups presented a higher prevalence of infodemic: older adults (PR: 1.65), individuals with low income (PR: 2.97), and those who had had contact with someone infected (PR: 2.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings reflect how some groups are more exposed to infodemic, and underline the responsibility and importance of intersectoral actions for dissemination of information about COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"337-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2024.2352982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation, and information search have increased dramatically. This increased search for information about the Coronavirus, called infodemic, was greatly affected by fake news and information without scientific evidence. This article aimed to assess the infodemic amid the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with sociodemographic and pandemic-related variables, as well as describe the main sources from which people obtained information about COVID-19.

Methods: A cross-sectional population-based study was performed in Criciúma, Brazil. All individuals aged 18 years or older, residing in the 607 households systematically selected, were invited to answer the questionnaire. Infodemic and sources to seek information about COVID-19 were evaluated, as well as sociodemographic and pandemic-related variables. Adjusted Poisson regression with robust variance was used to evaluate associations.

Results: A total of 863 individuals participated in the study. The prevalence of infodemic was 22.1%, and television was the main source of information (58.9%). Three groups presented a higher prevalence of infodemic: older adults (PR: 1.65), individuals with low income (PR: 2.97), and those who had had contact with someone infected (PR: 2.20).

Conclusions: The findings reflect how some groups are more exposed to infodemic, and underline the responsibility and importance of intersectoral actions for dissemination of information about COVID-19.

巴西人口中有关 COVID-19 的信息和信息来源:有哪些相关因素?
背景:随着 COVID-19 的流行,社会隔离和信息搜索急剧增加。这种对冠状病毒信息的搜索增加,被称为 "信息流行"(infodemic),受到假新闻和无科学依据信息的严重影响。本文旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行中的信息流行及其与社会人口学和大流行相关变量的关联,并描述人们获取 COVID-19 信息的主要来源:在巴西克里丘马开展了一项基于人口的横断面研究。在系统选取的 607 个家庭中居住的所有 18 岁或 18 岁以上的人都被邀请回答问卷。调查评估了有关 COVID-19 的信息和信息来源,以及社会人口和大流行相关变量。采用稳健方差调整泊松回归法评估相关性:共有 863 人参与了研究。信息流行率为 22.1%,电视是主要的信息来源(58.9%)。三个群体的感染率较高:老年人(PR:1.65)、低收入者(PR:2.97)和曾接触过感染者的人(PR:2.20):研究结果反映出某些群体更容易受到病毒感染,并强调了跨部门行动在传播 COVID-19 信息方面的责任和重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信