Conservative Treatment in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Fethullah Bayram, Bilinc Dogruoz Karatekin, Belgin Erhan, Ozge Pasin, Yasemin Yumusakhuylu
{"title":"Conservative Treatment in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: a Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Fethullah Bayram, Bilinc Dogruoz Karatekin, Belgin Erhan, Ozge Pasin, Yasemin Yumusakhuylu","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a coronal deviation of the spine greater than 10° resulting from the progressive degeneration of the vertebral elements in middle age, which is a three-dimensional deformity. In this study, the effect of conservative treatment methods on pain, disability, and quality of life of patients with ADS was evaluated. <b>Methods:</b>Thirty females with ADS were included in the present study. Demographic characteristics, Cobb angles, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaires (RMDQ) were noted. Fifteen sessions of physical therapy (hotpack, TENS and ultrasound) and exercises were administered to all patients. All assessment scales were used for evaluation at baseline as well as one month and three months after treatment. <b>Results:</b>Visual Analog Scale scores statistically differed between the first, second and third measurements (p<0,001). There was a significantly improvement in RMDQ between periods of time (p<0,001). While the second assessment was significantly lower than the first measure (p=0,001), there was no difference between the third and second measures (p=0,496). Similarly, quality of life assessments (SRS-22, SF-36) significantly differed between the first and second assessments and continued at the third assessment. <b>Conclusion:</b>Given the difficulties of surgical treatment and patients' comorbidities, conservative treatment methods are becoming important for ADS. Non-surgical treatments for ADS should be taken into consideration to improve pain, disability and quality of life outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a coronal deviation of the spine greater than 10° resulting from the progressive degeneration of the vertebral elements in middle age, which is a three-dimensional deformity. In this study, the effect of conservative treatment methods on pain, disability, and quality of life of patients with ADS was evaluated. Methods:Thirty females with ADS were included in the present study. Demographic characteristics, Cobb angles, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaires (RMDQ) were noted. Fifteen sessions of physical therapy (hotpack, TENS and ultrasound) and exercises were administered to all patients. All assessment scales were used for evaluation at baseline as well as one month and three months after treatment. Results:Visual Analog Scale scores statistically differed between the first, second and third measurements (p<0,001). There was a significantly improvement in RMDQ between periods of time (p<0,001). While the second assessment was significantly lower than the first measure (p=0,001), there was no difference between the third and second measures (p=0,496). Similarly, quality of life assessments (SRS-22, SF-36) significantly differed between the first and second assessments and continued at the third assessment. Conclusion:Given the difficulties of surgical treatment and patients' comorbidities, conservative treatment methods are becoming important for ADS. Non-surgical treatments for ADS should be taken into consideration to improve pain, disability and quality of life outcomes.

成人退行性脊柱侧凸的保守治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:成人退行性脊柱侧弯(ADS)是指中年后椎体逐渐退变导致的脊柱冠状面偏斜大于 10°,是一种三维畸形。本研究评估了保守治疗方法对 ADS 患者疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响。方法:本研究纳入了 30 名女性 ADS 患者。研究记录了患者的人口统计学特征、Cobb角度、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、短表格-36(SF-36)、脊柱侧凸研究协会-22(SRS-22)和罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)。所有患者均接受了 15 次物理治疗(热敷、TENS 和超声波)和锻炼。所有评估量表均用于基线评估以及治疗后一个月和三个月的评估。结论:鉴于手术治疗的困难和患者的合并症,保守治疗方法对 ADS 越来越重要。应考虑采用非手术疗法治疗 ADS,以改善疼痛、残疾和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信