Computerized assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI including electronic lesion removal.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.034501
Lindsay Douglas, Jordan Fuhrman, Qiyuan Hu, Alexandra Edwards, Deepa Sheth, Hiroyuki Abe, Maryellen Giger
{"title":"Computerized assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI including electronic lesion removal.","authors":"Lindsay Douglas, Jordan Fuhrman, Qiyuan Hu, Alexandra Edwards, Deepa Sheth, Hiroyuki Abe, Maryellen Giger","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.034501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current clinical assessment qualitatively describes background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked based on the visually perceived volume and intensity of enhancement in normal fibroglandular breast tissue in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. Tumor enhancement may be included within the visual assessment of BPE, thus inflating BPE estimation due to angiogenesis within the tumor. Using a dataset of 426 MRIs, we developed an automated method to segment breasts, electronically remove lesions, and calculate scores to estimate BPE levels.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A U-Net was trained for breast segmentation from DCE-MRI maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. Fuzzy <math><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></math>-means clustering was used to segment lesions; the lesion volume was removed prior to creating projections. U-Net outputs were applied to create projection images of both, affected, and unaffected breasts before and after lesion removal. BPE scores were calculated from various projection images, including MIPs or average intensity projections of first- or second postcontrast subtraction MRIs, to evaluate the effect of varying image parameters on automatic BPE assessment. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the predictive value of computed scores in BPE level classification tasks relative to radiologist ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant trends were found between radiologist BPE ratings and calculated BPE scores for all breast regions (Kendall correlation, <math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></math>). Scores from all breast regions performed significantly better than guessing (<math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.025</mn></mrow></math> from the <math><mrow><mi>z</mi></mrow></math>-test). Results failed to show a statistically significant difference in performance with and without lesion removal. BPE scores of the affected breast in the second postcontrast subtraction MIP after lesion removal performed statistically greater than random guessing across various viewing projections and DCE time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate the potential for automatic BPE scoring to serve as a quantitative value for objective BPE level classification from breast DCE-MR without the influence of lesion enhancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.034501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current clinical assessment qualitatively describes background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked based on the visually perceived volume and intensity of enhancement in normal fibroglandular breast tissue in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. Tumor enhancement may be included within the visual assessment of BPE, thus inflating BPE estimation due to angiogenesis within the tumor. Using a dataset of 426 MRIs, we developed an automated method to segment breasts, electronically remove lesions, and calculate scores to estimate BPE levels.

Approach: A U-Net was trained for breast segmentation from DCE-MRI maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. Fuzzy c-means clustering was used to segment lesions; the lesion volume was removed prior to creating projections. U-Net outputs were applied to create projection images of both, affected, and unaffected breasts before and after lesion removal. BPE scores were calculated from various projection images, including MIPs or average intensity projections of first- or second postcontrast subtraction MRIs, to evaluate the effect of varying image parameters on automatic BPE assessment. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the predictive value of computed scores in BPE level classification tasks relative to radiologist ratings.

Results: Statistically significant trends were found between radiologist BPE ratings and calculated BPE scores for all breast regions (Kendall correlation, p<0.001). Scores from all breast regions performed significantly better than guessing (p<0.025 from the z-test). Results failed to show a statistically significant difference in performance with and without lesion removal. BPE scores of the affected breast in the second postcontrast subtraction MIP after lesion removal performed statistically greater than random guessing across various viewing projections and DCE time points.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate the potential for automatic BPE scoring to serve as a quantitative value for objective BPE level classification from breast DCE-MR without the influence of lesion enhancement.

乳腺动态对比增强型核磁共振成像(包括电子病灶清除)背景实质增强的计算机化评估。
目的:目前的临床评估根据动态对比增强(DCE)-MRI 中正常纤维腺体乳腺组织肉眼感知的增强体积和强度,将背景实质增强(BPE)定性为最小、轻度、中度或明显。肿瘤增强可能包括在 BPE 的视觉评估中,因此肿瘤内的血管生成会夸大 BPE 的估计值。我们利用 426 例核磁共振成像的数据集,开发了一种自动方法来分割乳房、电子移除病灶并计算分数以估算 BPE 水平:方法:训练 U-Net 从 DCE-MRI 最大强度投影 (MIP) 图像进行乳房分割。使用模糊 c-means 聚类对病灶进行分割;在创建投影之前,先移除病灶体积。应用 U-Net 输出创建病灶移除前后受影响乳房和未受影响乳房的投影图像。通过各种投影图像(包括第一次或第二次对比减影后 MRI 的 MIP 或平均强度投影)计算 BPE 分数,以评估不同图像参数对自动 BPE 评估的影响。为了确定在 BPE 等级分类任务中计算得分相对于放射医师评分的预测价值,进行了接收者操作特征分析:在所有乳腺区域,放射科医生的 BPE 评级与计算的 BPE 分数之间存在明显的统计学趋势(Kendall 相关性,P0.001)。所有乳房区域的得分均明显优于猜测得分(z 检验 p0.025)。结果显示,切除病灶和未切除病灶的结果在统计学上没有明显差异。在不同的观察投影和 DCE 时间点上,病变切除后第二次对比减影 MIP 中受影响乳房的 BPE 分数在统计学上高于随机猜测:结果表明,自动 BPE 评分可作为乳腺 DCE-MR 客观 BPE 水平分类的定量值,而不受病灶增强的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信