Proarrhythmic drugs, drug levels, and polypharmacy in victims of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: An autopsy-based study from Denmark

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Proarrhythmic drugs, drug levels, and polypharmacy in victims of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: An autopsy-based study from Denmark","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS), characterized by an unknown or inconclusive cause of death at autopsy together with a negative or nonlethal toxicology screening result, is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in victims younger than 35 years. The complete causality of SADS remains unclear, with drugs being a potential risk factor.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the toxicologic profiles of SADS victims, focusing on proarrhythmic drugs, drug levels, and polypharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All deaths in Denmark of those aged 1–35 years in 2000–2019 and 36–49 years in 2007–2019 were examined through death certificates, national registries, and autopsy reports with toxicology screenings. We investigated all sudden unexpected death victims with an autopsy performed, including negative or nonlethal drug findings, where cause of death was unknown or inconclusive (SADS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 477 SADS victims; 313 (66%) had a positive toxicology screening result (adjudicated nonlethal), with an average of 2.8 drugs per case. More than half of the SADS victims with a positive toxicology screening result had QT-prolonging or brugadogenic drugs present. Polypharmacy was present in 66%, psychotropic<span><span> polypharmacy in 37%, and QT-prolonging polypharmacy in 22%, with the most frequent overall and QT-prolonging drug combination being an </span>antipsychotic and a psychoanaleptic drug. QT-prolonging drugs were more often present at suprapharmacologic levels than non–QT-prolonging drugs.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The majority of the SADS population had a positive toxicology screening result, with a notably large proportion having proarrhythmic drugs and polypharmacy. This highlights the need for future focus on drugs as a risk factor for SADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124025554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS), characterized by an unknown or inconclusive cause of death at autopsy together with a negative or nonlethal toxicology screening result, is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in victims younger than 35 years. The complete causality of SADS remains unclear, with drugs being a potential risk factor.

Objective

This study aimed to describe the toxicologic profiles of SADS victims, focusing on proarrhythmic drugs, drug levels, and polypharmacy.

Methods

All deaths in Denmark of those aged 1–35 years in 2000–2019 and 36–49 years in 2007–2019 were examined through death certificates, national registries, and autopsy reports with toxicology screenings. We investigated all sudden unexpected death victims with an autopsy performed, including negative or nonlethal drug findings, where cause of death was unknown or inconclusive (SADS).

Results

We identified 477 SADS victims; 313 (66%) had a positive toxicology screening result (adjudicated nonlethal), with an average of 2.8 drugs per case. More than half of the SADS victims with a positive toxicology screening result had QT-prolonging or brugadogenic drugs present. Polypharmacy was present in 66%, psychotropic polypharmacy in 37%, and QT-prolonging polypharmacy in 22%, with the most frequent overall and QT-prolonging drug combination being an antipsychotic and a psychoanaleptic drug. QT-prolonging drugs were more often present at suprapharmacologic levels than non–QT-prolonging drugs.

Conclusion

The majority of the SADS population had a positive toxicology screening result, with a notably large proportion having proarrhythmic drugs and polypharmacy. This highlights the need for future focus on drugs as a risk factor for SADS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心律失常猝死综合征患者的促心律失常药物、药物水平和多重用药:丹麦一项基于尸检的研究。
背景:心律失常性猝死综合征(SADS)的特点是尸检时死因不明或无法确定,同时毒理学检查结果为阴性或非致死性,是35岁以下患者心脏性猝死(SCD)最常见的原因。SADS的全部病因仍不清楚,而药物是一个潜在的危险因素:描述 SADS 患者的毒理学特征,重点关注促心律失常药物、药物水平和多重用药:通过死亡证明、国家登记和尸检报告以及毒理学筛查,对丹麦 2000-2019 年间 1-35 岁和 2007-2019 年间 36-49 岁的所有死亡病例进行了研究。我们调查了所有进行过尸检、死因不明或无法确定的意外猝死患者,包括阴性或非致死性药物检查结果(SADS):我们确定了 477 名 SADS 受害者,其中 313 人(66%)的毒理学筛查结果呈阳性(判定为非致命性),平均每例 2.8 种药物。在毒理学检查呈阳性的 SADS 受害者中,半数以上服用了可导致 QT 延长或致癌的药物。66%的受害者服用了多种药物,37%的受害者服用了精神药物,22%的受害者服用了延长QT的药物,其中最常见的药物组合和延长QT的药物组合是抗精神病药物和精神药物。与非QT延长药物相比,QT延长药物更常出现在超药物水平上:结论:大多数 SADS 患者的毒理学结果呈阳性,其中很大一部分患者服用了促心律失常药物和多种药物。结论:大多数 SADS 患者的毒理学结果呈阳性,其中有很大一部分人服用了促心律失常药物和多种药物,这突出表明今后需要重点关注药物这一 SADS 的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信