Long-term prognosis of acute primary angle closure in an east asian cohort.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s10384-024-01065-3
Yoon Jeong, Ki Ho Park, Jin Wook Jeoung
{"title":"Long-term prognosis of acute primary angle closure in an east asian cohort.","authors":"Yoon Jeong, Ki Ho Park, Jin Wook Jeoung","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01065-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide an updated analysis of the long-term outcomes of patients with acute primary angle closure (APAC) and to investigate the risk factors for visual field (VF) loss progression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, clinical cohort study METHODS: One hundred and forty-six APAC patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The presenting features and the treatment utilized were recorded. The visual and intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes were analyzed. The main outcome measures were the proportion of blindness and IOP at the final visit. A subset of patients with sufficient VF results was divided into a stable and progressive group based on mean deviation (MD) loss rate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients (6.2%) were blind, and 76.0% (111/146) had final decimal visual acuity greater than or equal to 0.5. All patients had normal final IOP, and 65.1% (95/146) were medication-free. 64.4% (94/146) underwent cataract surgery at a median 4 months after their APAC attack. The use of topical hypotensive medications (OR = 8.029, P = 0.012) was the only significant predictor of fast MD loss in the multivariate regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The long-term outcomes of APAC in recent years have been more promising. All patients maintained normal IOP several years following their APAC attack, and fewer than half required hypotensive agents. The incidence of blindness was low. These findings suggest that current practice patterns in the management of APAC are beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01065-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To provide an updated analysis of the long-term outcomes of patients with acute primary angle closure (APAC) and to investigate the risk factors for visual field (VF) loss progression.

Study design: Retrospective, clinical cohort study METHODS: One hundred and forty-six APAC patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The presenting features and the treatment utilized were recorded. The visual and intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes were analyzed. The main outcome measures were the proportion of blindness and IOP at the final visit. A subset of patients with sufficient VF results was divided into a stable and progressive group based on mean deviation (MD) loss rate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of progression.

Results: Nine patients (6.2%) were blind, and 76.0% (111/146) had final decimal visual acuity greater than or equal to 0.5. All patients had normal final IOP, and 65.1% (95/146) were medication-free. 64.4% (94/146) underwent cataract surgery at a median 4 months after their APAC attack. The use of topical hypotensive medications (OR = 8.029, P = 0.012) was the only significant predictor of fast MD loss in the multivariate regression.

Conclusions: The long-term outcomes of APAC in recent years have been more promising. All patients maintained normal IOP several years following their APAC attack, and fewer than half required hypotensive agents. The incidence of blindness was low. These findings suggest that current practice patterns in the management of APAC are beneficial.

Abstract Image

东亚队列中急性原发性闭角的长期预后。
目的:对急性原发性角膜闭合(APAC)患者的长期预后进行最新分析,并调查视野(VF)缺损进展的风险因素:研究设计:回顾性临床队列研究 方法:纳入至少随访 1 年的 146 例 APAC 患者。研究记录了患者的发病特征和所采用的治疗方法。对视力和眼压(IOP)结果进行了分析。主要结果指标是最终就诊时的失明比例和眼压。根据平均偏差(MD)丢失率,将有足够 VF 结果的患者分为稳定组和进展组。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定病情进展的预测因素:9名患者(6.2%)失明,76.0%(111/146)的最终十进制视力大于或等于0.5。所有患者的最终眼压均正常,65.1%(95/146)的患者无需服药。64.4%(94/146)的患者在 APAC 发作后中位 4 个月接受了白内障手术。在多变量回归中,使用局部降压药物(OR = 8.029,P = 0.012)是唯一显著预测MD快速丧失的因素:结论:近年来,APAC 的长期疗效更加令人鼓舞。所有患者在 APAC 病发数年后眼压都保持正常,只有不到一半的患者需要使用降压药。失明的发生率也很低。这些研究结果表明,目前治疗 APAC 的实践模式是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信