Economic indicators evaluation to study the feasibility of a solar agriculture farm: A case study

Shivani Gautam , D. Bhagwan Das , Ajay Kumar Saxena
{"title":"Economic indicators evaluation to study the feasibility of a solar agriculture farm: A case study","authors":"Shivani Gautam ,&nbsp;D. Bhagwan Das ,&nbsp;Ajay Kumar Saxena","doi":"10.1016/j.solcom.2024.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The 209 kWp solar agricultural farm at Dayalbagh Educational Institute's Dairy Campus in Agra, India, is the subject of this economic analysis. This study analyzes economic indicators relevant to agriculture food production, such as gross financial margins, farm profits, and cost-benefit ratios. Other measured variables include NPV (net present value), PB (payback period), and LCOE (levelized cost of electricity) of solar power generation to determine the economic viability of this agrivoltaics (production of solar energy and agriculture on the same land) APV project. Farm profit and gross financial margins both are positive values of 161, 907 INR (Indian Rupees) and 316, 907 INR, respectively. The cost-benefit ratio was 1.5.The economic factors of solar energy generation were studied for two systems: surface-mounted or ground-mounted solar systems and an elevated solar system with agriculture production on the same ground (APV or agrivoltaics). Both systems had the same production capacity. Two different hypothetical situations were used for each system. In the first situation (Case Study A), the assumption was that solar power performance would remain constant during operation. In the second situation (Case Study B), the assumption was that annual performance would be reduced by 0.5 %.The results show that APV is better than the surface-mounted system because there is no significant difference between the payback periods of APV and surface-mounted systems; the NPV of APV is greater than the surface-mounted solar system for both the study case A and case B and the LCOE of APV is 55 % less than the LCOE of the surface-mounted solar system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101173,"journal":{"name":"Solar Compass","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000080/pdfft?md5=13ef6964481efc6106ca279cbf5258ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2772940024000080-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 209 kWp solar agricultural farm at Dayalbagh Educational Institute's Dairy Campus in Agra, India, is the subject of this economic analysis. This study analyzes economic indicators relevant to agriculture food production, such as gross financial margins, farm profits, and cost-benefit ratios. Other measured variables include NPV (net present value), PB (payback period), and LCOE (levelized cost of electricity) of solar power generation to determine the economic viability of this agrivoltaics (production of solar energy and agriculture on the same land) APV project. Farm profit and gross financial margins both are positive values of 161, 907 INR (Indian Rupees) and 316, 907 INR, respectively. The cost-benefit ratio was 1.5.The economic factors of solar energy generation were studied for two systems: surface-mounted or ground-mounted solar systems and an elevated solar system with agriculture production on the same ground (APV or agrivoltaics). Both systems had the same production capacity. Two different hypothetical situations were used for each system. In the first situation (Case Study A), the assumption was that solar power performance would remain constant during operation. In the second situation (Case Study B), the assumption was that annual performance would be reduced by 0.5 %.The results show that APV is better than the surface-mounted system because there is no significant difference between the payback periods of APV and surface-mounted systems; the NPV of APV is greater than the surface-mounted solar system for both the study case A and case B and the LCOE of APV is 55 % less than the LCOE of the surface-mounted solar system.

研究太阳能农业农场可行性的经济指标评估:案例研究
印度阿格拉 Dayalbagh 教育学院奶制品校区的 209 kWp 太阳能农业农场是本经济分析的主题。本研究分析了与农业食品生产相关的经济指标,如毛利率、农场利润和成本效益比。其他衡量变量包括太阳能发电的 NPV(净现值)、PB(投资回收期)和 LCOE(平准化电力成本),以确定该农业光伏(在同一块土地上生产太阳能和农业)APV 项目的经济可行性。农场利润和毛利率均为正值,分别为 161 907 印度卢比和 316 907 印度卢比。对两种太阳能发电系统的经济因素进行了研究:地面安装或地面安装太阳能系统和在同一土地上进行农业生产的高架太阳能系统(APV 或农业光伏)。两个系统的生产能力相同。每个系统都有两种不同的假设情况。在第一种情况下(案例研究 A),假设太阳能发电性能在运行期间保持不变。结果表明,农用光伏发电系统优于地面安装系统,因为农用光伏发电系统和地面安装系统的投资回收期没有显著差异;在研究案例 A 和案例 B 中,农用光伏发电系统的净现值均高于地面安装太阳能系统,而且农用光伏发电系统的 LCOE 比地面安装太阳能系统的 LCOE 低 55%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信