East Asian perspective of responsible research and innovation in neurotechnology

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Tamami Fukushi
{"title":"East Asian perspective of responsible research and innovation in neurotechnology","authors":"Tamami Fukushi","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After more than half a century of research and development (R&amp;D), Brain–computer interface (BCI)-based Neurotechnology continues to progress as one of the leading technologies of the 2020 s worldwide. Various reports and academic literature in Europe and the United States (U.S.) have outlined the trends in the R&amp;D of neurotechnology and the consideration of ethical issues, and the importance of the formulation of ethical principles, guidance and industrial standards as well as the development of relevant human resources has been discussed. However, limited number studies have focused on neurotechnology R&amp;D, the dissemination of neuroethics related to the academic foundation advancing the discussion on ethical principles, guidance and standards or human resource development in the Asian region. This study fills in this gap in understanding of Eastern Asian (China, Korea and Japan) situation based on the participation in activities to develop ethical principles, guidance, and industrial standards for appropriate use of neurotechnology, in addition to literature survey and clinical registries’ search investigation reflecting the trends in neurotechnology R&amp;D as well as its social implication in Asian region. The current study compared the results with the situation in Europa and the U.S. and discussed issues that need to be addressed in the future and discussed the significance and potential of corporate consortium initiatives in Japan and examples of ethics and governance activities in Asian Countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13195,"journal":{"name":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Pages 582-597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000435/pdfft?md5=ae4cc5e479c07d468b5cf2c902b8d093&pid=1-s2.0-S2667242124000435-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After more than half a century of research and development (R&D), Brain–computer interface (BCI)-based Neurotechnology continues to progress as one of the leading technologies of the 2020 s worldwide. Various reports and academic literature in Europe and the United States (U.S.) have outlined the trends in the R&D of neurotechnology and the consideration of ethical issues, and the importance of the formulation of ethical principles, guidance and industrial standards as well as the development of relevant human resources has been discussed. However, limited number studies have focused on neurotechnology R&D, the dissemination of neuroethics related to the academic foundation advancing the discussion on ethical principles, guidance and standards or human resource development in the Asian region. This study fills in this gap in understanding of Eastern Asian (China, Korea and Japan) situation based on the participation in activities to develop ethical principles, guidance, and industrial standards for appropriate use of neurotechnology, in addition to literature survey and clinical registries’ search investigation reflecting the trends in neurotechnology R&D as well as its social implication in Asian region. The current study compared the results with the situation in Europa and the U.S. and discussed issues that need to be addressed in the future and discussed the significance and potential of corporate consortium initiatives in Japan and examples of ethics and governance activities in Asian Countries.

从东亚角度看神经技术领域负责任的研究与创新
经过半个多世纪的研究与开发(R&D),基于脑机接口(BCI)的神经技术作为 2020 年代全球领先的技术之一继续向前发展。欧洲和美国的各种报告和学术文献概述了神经技术研发的趋势和对伦理问题的考虑,并讨论了制定伦理原则、指南和行业标准以及开发相关人力资源的重要性。然而,在亚洲地区,关注神经技术研发、与学术基础相关的神经伦理传播、推进伦理原则、指导和标准的讨论或人力资源开发的研究数量有限。本研究填补了这一空白,除了文献调查和临床登记检索调查反映神经技术研发的趋势及其在亚洲地区的社会影响外,还通过参与制定神经技术合理使用的伦理原则、指南和行业标准的活动,了解东亚(中国、韩国和日本)的情况。本研究将结果与欧洲和美国的情况进行了比较,并讨论了今后需要解决的问题,还讨论了日本企业联盟倡议的意义和潜力,以及亚洲国家伦理和治理活动的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IBRO Neuroscience Reports
IBRO Neuroscience Reports Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信