ASAP: A pharmacy-level intervention to increase nonprescription syringe sales to reduce bloodborne illnesses

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
B.E. Meyerson , J. Agley , R.A. Crosby , K.G. Bentele , N. Vadiei , L.B. Linde-Krieger , D.R. Russell , K. Fine , L.A. Eldridge
{"title":"ASAP: A pharmacy-level intervention to increase nonprescription syringe sales to reduce bloodborne illnesses","authors":"B.E. Meyerson ,&nbsp;J. Agley ,&nbsp;R.A. Crosby ,&nbsp;K.G. Bentele ,&nbsp;N. Vadiei ,&nbsp;L.B. Linde-Krieger ,&nbsp;D.R. Russell ,&nbsp;K. Fine ,&nbsp;L.A. Eldridge","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pharmacy syringe sales are effective structural interventions to reduce bloodborne illnesses in populations, and are legal in all but two states. Yet evidence indicates reduced syringe sales in recent years. This study was designed as a feasibility test of an intervention to promote syringe sales by pharmacies in Arizona.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A four-month pilot among three Arizona pharmacies measured feasibility and acceptability through monthly surveys to 18 enrolled pharmacy staff members.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pharmacy staff reported increased ease of dispensing syringes across the study. Rankings of syringe dispensing as ‘easiest’ among 6 measured pharmacy practices increased from 38.9 % at baseline to 50.1 % post intervention module training, and to 83.3 % at pilot conclusion. The majority (72.2 %) of pharmacy staff agreed that intervention materials were easy to use. Over 70 % indicated that the intervention was influential in their “being more open to selling syringes without a prescription to someone who might use them for illicit drug use,” and 61.1 % reported that in the future, they were highly likely to dispense syringes to customers who would use them to inject drugs. A vast majority (92 %) reported being likely to dispense subsidized naloxone if available to their pharmacy at no cost.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An education-based intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to pharmacy staff and had an observed impact on perceptions of ease and likelihood of dispensing syringes without a prescription to people who may use them to inject drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124001578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pharmacy syringe sales are effective structural interventions to reduce bloodborne illnesses in populations, and are legal in all but two states. Yet evidence indicates reduced syringe sales in recent years. This study was designed as a feasibility test of an intervention to promote syringe sales by pharmacies in Arizona.

Methods

A four-month pilot among three Arizona pharmacies measured feasibility and acceptability through monthly surveys to 18 enrolled pharmacy staff members.

Results

Pharmacy staff reported increased ease of dispensing syringes across the study. Rankings of syringe dispensing as ‘easiest’ among 6 measured pharmacy practices increased from 38.9 % at baseline to 50.1 % post intervention module training, and to 83.3 % at pilot conclusion. The majority (72.2 %) of pharmacy staff agreed that intervention materials were easy to use. Over 70 % indicated that the intervention was influential in their “being more open to selling syringes without a prescription to someone who might use them for illicit drug use,” and 61.1 % reported that in the future, they were highly likely to dispense syringes to customers who would use them to inject drugs. A vast majority (92 %) reported being likely to dispense subsidized naloxone if available to their pharmacy at no cost.

Conclusions

An education-based intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to pharmacy staff and had an observed impact on perceptions of ease and likelihood of dispensing syringes without a prescription to people who may use them to inject drugs.

ASAP:药店层面的干预措施,增加非处方注射器的销售,减少血源性疾病。
背景:药店销售注射器是减少血液传播疾病的有效结构性干预措施,除两个州外,在其他所有州都是合法的。但有证据表明,近年来注射器销售量有所减少。本研究旨在对促进亚利桑那州药房销售注射器的干预措施进行可行性测试:在亚利桑那州的三家药店进行了为期四个月的试点,通过每月对 18 名注册药店员工进行调查,衡量其可行性和可接受性:结果:在整个研究过程中,药房工作人员均表示注射器配发更加方便。在 6 项测量的药房实践中,将注射器配药评为 "最简单 "的比例从基线时的 38.9% 提高到干预模块培训后的 50.1%,并在试点结束时提高到 83.3%。大多数药房工作人员(72.2%)认为干预材料易于使用。超过 70% 的药房工作人员表示,干预措施对他们 "更愿意在没有处方的情况下向可能将注射器用于非法吸毒的人出售注射器 "产生了影响,61.1% 的药房工作人员表示,他们今后极有可能向将注射器用于注射吸毒的顾客配发注射器。绝大多数人(92%)表示,如果他们的药房可以免费提供有补贴的纳洛酮,他们很可能会发放纳洛酮:研究发现,以教育为基础的干预措施是可行的,药房员工也能接受,并对向可能使用注射器注射毒品的人配发无处方注射器的难易程度和可能性产生了明显的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信