External validation and updating of the infusion rate individualization of soybean oil–based intravenous lipid emulsion: A descriptive cohort study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Keizo Fukushima PhD, Kenji Omura MD, Satoshi Goshi MD, Azusa Futatsugi PhD, Yoriyuki Takamori MD, Takahiro Sasamoto MD, Takae Tsujimoto PhD, Keiji Iriyama MD, Nobuyuki Sugioka PhD
{"title":"External validation and updating of the infusion rate individualization of soybean oil–based intravenous lipid emulsion: A descriptive cohort study","authors":"Keizo Fukushima PhD,&nbsp;Kenji Omura MD,&nbsp;Satoshi Goshi MD,&nbsp;Azusa Futatsugi PhD,&nbsp;Yoriyuki Takamori MD,&nbsp;Takahiro Sasamoto MD,&nbsp;Takae Tsujimoto PhD,&nbsp;Keiji Iriyama MD,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Sugioka PhD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Safe and efficient provision of intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) requires a strategy to individualize infusion rates. Estimating the maximum acceptable infusion rate (MaxInfRate) of soybean oil–based ILE (SO-ILE) in individuals by using a triglyceride (TG) kinetic model was reported to be feasible. In this study, we aimed to externally validate and, if needed, update the MaxInfRate estimation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The maximum TG concentration (TG<sub>max</sub>) in patients receiving SO-ILE at MaxInfRate was evaluated to determine if it met the definition of being &lt;400 mg/dl for 90th percentile of patients. The TG kinetic model was evaluated through prediction performance checks and was subsequently updated using the data set of both the previous model development and present validation studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 83 patients, 74 had TG<sub>max</sub> &lt;400 mg/dl, corresponding to a probability of 89.2% (95% CI, 81.9%–95.2%), and the 90th percentile of TG<sub>max</sub> was 400 mg/dl (95% CI, 328–490 mg/dl), closely aligned with the theoretical values. However, the individual TG<sub>max</sub> values were biased by the infusion rate because the covariate effects were overestimated in the TG kinetic model, requiring a minor revision. The updated MaxInfRate with the combined data set showed unbiased and more accurate predictions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The MaxInfRate was validated in external inpatients and updated with all available data. MaxInfRate estimation for individuals could be an option for the safe and efficient provision of SO-ILE.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2636","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Safe and efficient provision of intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) requires a strategy to individualize infusion rates. Estimating the maximum acceptable infusion rate (MaxInfRate) of soybean oil–based ILE (SO-ILE) in individuals by using a triglyceride (TG) kinetic model was reported to be feasible. In this study, we aimed to externally validate and, if needed, update the MaxInfRate estimation.

Methods

The maximum TG concentration (TGmax) in patients receiving SO-ILE at MaxInfRate was evaluated to determine if it met the definition of being <400 mg/dl for 90th percentile of patients. The TG kinetic model was evaluated through prediction performance checks and was subsequently updated using the data set of both the previous model development and present validation studies.

Results

Out of 83 patients, 74 had TGmax <400 mg/dl, corresponding to a probability of 89.2% (95% CI, 81.9%–95.2%), and the 90th percentile of TGmax was 400 mg/dl (95% CI, 328–490 mg/dl), closely aligned with the theoretical values. However, the individual TGmax values were biased by the infusion rate because the covariate effects were overestimated in the TG kinetic model, requiring a minor revision. The updated MaxInfRate with the combined data set showed unbiased and more accurate predictions.

Conclusion

The MaxInfRate was validated in external inpatients and updated with all available data. MaxInfRate estimation for individuals could be an option for the safe and efficient provision of SO-ILE.

Abstract Image

大豆油基静脉注射脂质乳剂输注速度个体化的外部验证和更新:一项描述性队列研究。
背景:要安全有效地提供静脉注射脂质乳剂(ILE),就必须制定个体化输注速率的策略。据报道,通过使用甘油三酯(TG)动力学模型估算个体对大豆油基 ILE(SO-ILE)的最大可接受输注率(MaxInfRate)是可行的。本研究旨在从外部验证并在必要时更新 MaxInfRate 估计值:方法:对以 MaxInfRate 接受 SO-ILE 的患者的最大 TG 浓度(TGmax)进行评估,以确定其是否符合结果的定义:在 83 位患者中,74 位患者的最大总胆固醇浓度为 400 mg/dl(95% CI,328-490 mg/dl),与理论值非常接近。然而,由于 TG 动力学模型中的协变量效应被高估,因此单个 TGmax 值受到输注率的影响而出现偏差,需要进行小幅修正。综合数据集更新后的 MaxInfRate 预测无偏见且更准确:结论:MaxInfRate 已在外部住院患者中得到验证,并根据所有可用数据进行了更新。对个人的 MaxInfRate 估计可以作为安全有效地提供 SO-ILE 的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信