Beyond pulmonary rehabilitation: can the PICk UP programme fill the gap? A randomised trial in COPD.

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
P Rebelo, D Brooks, J Cravo, M A Mendes, A C Oliveira, A S Rijo, M J Moura, A Marques
{"title":"Beyond pulmonary rehabilitation: can the PICk UP programme fill the gap? A randomised trial in COPD.","authors":"P Rebelo, D Brooks, J Cravo, M A Mendes, A C Oliveira, A S Rijo, M J Moura, A Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a fundamental intervention to manage COPD, however, maintaining its benefits is challenging. Engaging in physical activity might help to prolong PR benefits. This study assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of a personalised community-based physical activity programme to sustain physical activity and other health-related PR benefits, in people with COPD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. Following 12-weeks of PR, people with COPD were assigned to a six-months personalised community-based physical activity programme (experimental group), or to standard care (control group). Physical activity was assessed via: time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activities per day (primary outcome measure), steps/day and the brief physical activity assessment tool. Secondary outcomes included sedentary behaviour, functional status, peripheral muscle strength, balance, symptoms, emotional state, health-related quality of life, exacerbations and healthcare utilization. Assessments were performed immediately post-PR and after three- and six-months. Efficacy and effectiveness were evaluated using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis with linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one participants (experimental group: n = 32; control group: n = 29), with balanced baseline characteristics between groups (69.6 ± 8.5 years old, 84 % male, FEV<sub>1</sub> 57.1 ± 16.7 %predicted) were included. Changes in all physical activity outcomes and in one-minute sit-to-stand were significantly different (P < 0.05) between groups at the six-month follow-up. In the remaining outcomes there were no differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The community-based physical activity programme resulted in better physical activity levels and sit-to-stand performance, six-months after completing PR, in COPD. No additional benefits were observed for other secondary outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2024.04.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a fundamental intervention to manage COPD, however, maintaining its benefits is challenging. Engaging in physical activity might help to prolong PR benefits. This study assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of a personalised community-based physical activity programme to sustain physical activity and other health-related PR benefits, in people with COPD.

Materials and methods: This was a multicentre, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. Following 12-weeks of PR, people with COPD were assigned to a six-months personalised community-based physical activity programme (experimental group), or to standard care (control group). Physical activity was assessed via: time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activities per day (primary outcome measure), steps/day and the brief physical activity assessment tool. Secondary outcomes included sedentary behaviour, functional status, peripheral muscle strength, balance, symptoms, emotional state, health-related quality of life, exacerbations and healthcare utilization. Assessments were performed immediately post-PR and after three- and six-months. Efficacy and effectiveness were evaluated using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis with linear mixed models.

Results: Sixty-one participants (experimental group: n = 32; control group: n = 29), with balanced baseline characteristics between groups (69.6 ± 8.5 years old, 84 % male, FEV1 57.1 ± 16.7 %predicted) were included. Changes in all physical activity outcomes and in one-minute sit-to-stand were significantly different (P < 0.05) between groups at the six-month follow-up. In the remaining outcomes there were no differences between groups.

Conclusions: The community-based physical activity programme resulted in better physical activity levels and sit-to-stand performance, six-months after completing PR, in COPD. No additional benefits were observed for other secondary outcomes.

肺康复之外:PICk UP 计划能否填补空白?慢性阻塞性肺病随机试验。
导言和目标:肺康复(PR)是控制慢性阻塞性肺病的一项基本干预措施,然而,保持其益处却具有挑战性。参与体育锻炼可能有助于延长肺康复疗效。本研究评估了基于社区的个性化体育锻炼计划对慢性阻塞性肺病患者保持体育锻炼和其他与健康相关的肺康复益处的效力和有效性:这是一项多中心、评估者盲法随机对照试验。慢性阻塞性肺病患者在接受 12 周的康复治疗后,被分配到为期 6 个月的个性化社区体育锻炼计划(实验组)或标准护理(对照组)。体力活动通过以下方式进行评估:每天进行中度至剧烈体力活动的时间(主要结果测量)、每天的步数和简要体力活动评估工具。次要结果包括久坐行为、功能状态、外周肌力、平衡能力、症状、情绪状态、与健康相关的生活质量、病情恶化和医疗利用率。评估在患者接受康复训练后立即进行,并在三个月和六个月后进行。采用线性混合模型进行意向治疗和按协议分析,评估疗效:结果:61 名参与者(实验组:n = 32;对照组:n = 29)的基线特征均衡(69.6 ± 8.5 岁,84 % 为男性,FEV1 57.1 ± 16.7 % 为预测值)。在 6 个月的随访中,各组间所有体力活动结果和一分钟坐立的变化均有显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:结论:社区体育锻炼计划提高了慢性阻塞性肺病患者的体育锻炼水平,并在完成PR六个月后改善了坐立表现。在其他次要结果中未观察到额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信