Optimizing Venous Stenting: Consensus Recommendations for Enhanced Management of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1786755
Javier Trujillo-Santos, Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez, Alexis Bravo de Laguna-Taboada, Santiago Zubicoa-Ezpeleta, Alejandro Rodríguez-Morata, Ignacio Lojo-Rocamonde, Antoni Riera-Mestre
{"title":"Optimizing Venous Stenting: Consensus Recommendations for Enhanced Management of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis.","authors":"Javier Trujillo-Santos, Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez, Alexis Bravo de Laguna-Taboada, Santiago Zubicoa-Ezpeleta, Alejandro Rodríguez-Morata, Ignacio Lojo-Rocamonde, Antoni Riera-Mestre","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) poses a complex challenge and often leads to postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), a debilitating complication. The emergence of venous stents offers a potential preventive avenue against this complication. This study aimed to provide consensus recommendations on the use of venous stent for DVT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> From June to July 2023, 20 internal medicine, angiology and vascular surgery, and vascular and interventional radiology experts were involved in the Delphi process. Thirty-one recommendations, categorized into three thematic areas, were rigorously evaluated: indications for stent use, stent selection and placement, and monitoring and prevention of complications. Agreement was evaluated using a Likert scale, with consensus defined as agreement by two-thirds of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Consensus was reached for 23 (74.2%) of 31 recommendations. The agreement was centered on considerations, such as stent placement in specific acute DVT scenarios, emphasizing pivotal stent characteristics. However, there were divergences in the recommended stent length to prevent migration and stent characteristics based on iliocaval bifurcation morphology. Notably, there was no consensus on whether patients with DVT caused by a major transient risk factor need more than 3 months of anticoagulation therapy or whether aspirin should be added to anticoagulant treatment after venous stenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> These consensus recommendations offer practical insights into optimizing venous stent use to prevent PTS in DVT patients. Addressing the critical aspects of stent selection, placement, and postprocedural care, these recommendations contribute to clinical decision-making. The identified divergences underscore the importance of consensus and thus indicate the need for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21673,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:  Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) poses a complex challenge and often leads to postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), a debilitating complication. The emergence of venous stents offers a potential preventive avenue against this complication. This study aimed to provide consensus recommendations on the use of venous stent for DVT.

Materials and methods:  From June to July 2023, 20 internal medicine, angiology and vascular surgery, and vascular and interventional radiology experts were involved in the Delphi process. Thirty-one recommendations, categorized into three thematic areas, were rigorously evaluated: indications for stent use, stent selection and placement, and monitoring and prevention of complications. Agreement was evaluated using a Likert scale, with consensus defined as agreement by two-thirds of the participants.

Results:  Consensus was reached for 23 (74.2%) of 31 recommendations. The agreement was centered on considerations, such as stent placement in specific acute DVT scenarios, emphasizing pivotal stent characteristics. However, there were divergences in the recommended stent length to prevent migration and stent characteristics based on iliocaval bifurcation morphology. Notably, there was no consensus on whether patients with DVT caused by a major transient risk factor need more than 3 months of anticoagulation therapy or whether aspirin should be added to anticoagulant treatment after venous stenting.

Conclusions:  These consensus recommendations offer practical insights into optimizing venous stent use to prevent PTS in DVT patients. Addressing the critical aspects of stent selection, placement, and postprocedural care, these recommendations contribute to clinical decision-making. The identified divergences underscore the importance of consensus and thus indicate the need for further investigation.

优化静脉支架植入术:下肢深静脉血栓形成强化治疗共识建议》(Consensus Recommendations for Enhanced Management of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis)。
简介:深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是一项复杂的挑战,通常会导致血栓形成后综合征(PTS)这一使人衰弱的并发症。静脉支架的出现为预防这种并发症提供了潜在的途径。本研究旨在就使用静脉支架治疗深静脉血栓提供共识建议:2023 年 6 月至 7 月,20 位内科、血管病学和血管外科、血管和介入放射学专家参与了德尔菲过程。31项建议分为三个主题领域进行了严格评估:支架使用的适应症、支架的选择和放置以及并发症的监测和预防。评估采用李克特量表,三分之二的参与者同意即为达成共识:结果:31 项建议中有 23 项(74.2%)达成了共识。一致意见主要集中在一些考虑因素上,如在特定急性深静脉血栓情况下的支架置入,强调了支架的关键特性。然而,在防止移位的支架推荐长度和基于髂腹分叉形态的支架特征方面存在分歧。值得注意的是,对于由主要瞬时危险因素导致的深静脉血栓患者是否需要超过3个月的抗凝治疗,以及静脉支架术后是否应在抗凝治疗的基础上加用阿司匹林等问题,尚未达成共识:这些共识建议为优化静脉支架的使用以预防深静脉血栓患者的 PTS 提供了实用的见解。这些建议涉及支架选择、置入和术后护理的关键环节,有助于临床决策。已发现的分歧强调了达成共识的重要性,因此表明有必要进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
21.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis is a topic driven review journal that focuses on all issues relating to hemostatic and thrombotic disorders. As one of the premiere review journals in the field, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis serves as a comprehensive forum for important advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. The journal also publishes peer reviewed original research papers. Seminars offers an informed perspective on today''s pivotal issues, including hemophilia A & B, thrombophilia, gene therapy, venous and arterial thrombosis, von Willebrand disease, vascular disorders and thromboembolic diseases. Attention is also given to the latest developments in pharmaceutical drugs along with treatment and current management techniques. The journal also frequently publishes sponsored supplements to further highlight emerging trends in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信