Design and Biomechanical Analysis of a Customized Angled Abutment Based on Tooth Inclination for Immediate Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla.

Chih-Ching Chi, Yen-Wen Shen, Jui-Ting Hsu, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Heng-Li Huang
{"title":"Design and Biomechanical Analysis of a Customized Angled Abutment Based on Tooth Inclination for Immediate Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla.","authors":"Chih-Ching Chi, Yen-Wen Shen, Jui-Ting Hsu, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Heng-Li Huang","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a finite element analysis (FEA) and an in vitro experiment to investigate and compare the loading effects (effects on the implant and surrounding bone) of various customized angled abutments to commercial 15-degree angled abutments (control).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four customized angled abutment models (21.9, 24.15, 20.22, and 33 degrees) were developed using CBCT images of incisor inclination measurements from patients of various age groups (20 to 23, 24 to 39, and 40 to 65 years). 3D maxillary bone models were created from the CBCT images of four individual patients: One patient from each age group with the respective average incisor inclination measurement and another patient with the overall average were selected. Then, FEA and in vitro strain gauge experiments were conducted by applying 100 N or 50 N of axial or oblique force to each model in order to assess the differences in stress/strain between the customized angled abutments (test) and the control in both the implants and surrounding bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under axial loading, the stress values in the implant and surrounding bone were elevated due to the relatively higher angles of the customized angled abutments (21.9, 24.15, 20.22, and 33 degrees) compared to the control angled abutments. Under oblique loading, the control angled abutments exhibited higher stress values in both the implant and surrounding bone. For the in vitro experiment, there was no statistically significant difference in bone strain between the customized (21.9 degree) and the control angled abutments in axial loading. Nevertheless, the control angled abutment with oblique loading induced greater bone strains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Customized angled abutments offer lower stress/strain under oblique loads but higher stress/strain under axial loads compared to the control abutments. Therefore, in the design and application of angled abutments, careful consideration of the occlusal load direction is important for achieving the biomechanical success of an implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"209-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a finite element analysis (FEA) and an in vitro experiment to investigate and compare the loading effects (effects on the implant and surrounding bone) of various customized angled abutments to commercial 15-degree angled abutments (control).

Materials and methods: Four customized angled abutment models (21.9, 24.15, 20.22, and 33 degrees) were developed using CBCT images of incisor inclination measurements from patients of various age groups (20 to 23, 24 to 39, and 40 to 65 years). 3D maxillary bone models were created from the CBCT images of four individual patients: One patient from each age group with the respective average incisor inclination measurement and another patient with the overall average were selected. Then, FEA and in vitro strain gauge experiments were conducted by applying 100 N or 50 N of axial or oblique force to each model in order to assess the differences in stress/strain between the customized angled abutments (test) and the control in both the implants and surrounding bone.

Results: Under axial loading, the stress values in the implant and surrounding bone were elevated due to the relatively higher angles of the customized angled abutments (21.9, 24.15, 20.22, and 33 degrees) compared to the control angled abutments. Under oblique loading, the control angled abutments exhibited higher stress values in both the implant and surrounding bone. For the in vitro experiment, there was no statistically significant difference in bone strain between the customized (21.9 degree) and the control angled abutments in axial loading. Nevertheless, the control angled abutment with oblique loading induced greater bone strains.

Conclusions: Customized angled abutments offer lower stress/strain under oblique loads but higher stress/strain under axial loads compared to the control abutments. Therefore, in the design and application of angled abutments, careful consideration of the occlusal load direction is important for achieving the biomechanical success of an implant.

基于牙齿倾角的定制成角基台的设计和生物力学分析,用于上颌前牙区域的即刻种植体植入。
目的:采用有限元分析和体外实验研究成角基台的负荷效应,比较根据患者门牙平均角度定制的各种成角基台与商用 15°∆ 成角基台对种植体和周围骨质的影响:方法:利用不同年龄组患者门牙倾斜度的锥束计算机断层扫描 (CBCT) 图像,开发了四种定制的倾斜基台模型(21.9°∆、24.15°∆、20.22°∆、33°∆)。根据四名患者的 CBCT 图像创建了三维上颌骨模型。通过有限元分析和体外应变计实验,施加 100N 或 50N 的轴向力或斜向力,以评估定制基台和商用 15°∆ 角基台在种植体和周围骨中的应力/应变差异:与商用 15°∆ 角基台相比,在轴向负荷下,由于定制角基台的角度相对较高(21.9°∆、24.15°∆、20.22°∆、33°∆),种植体和周围骨质的应力值升高;但在斜向负荷下,商用 15°∆ 角基台在种植体和周围骨质中的应力值较高。在体外实验中,定制基台(21.9°∆)和商用 15°∆ 角基台在轴向负荷下的骨应变没有静态差异。然而,在斜向负荷中,使用商用 15°∆ 角基台引起的骨应变更高:结论:与商用基台相比,定制的斜角基台在斜向负荷下的应力/应变较低,但在轴向负荷下的应力/应变较高。因此,在设计和应用斜角基台时,仔细考虑咬合负荷方向对于实现种植牙的生物力学成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信