What Factors Contribute to Ethical Problems in Patient Care? A Scoping Review and Case Series of Clinical Ethics Consultations.

Q3 Medicine
Jan Schürmann, Stella Reiter-Theil
{"title":"What Factors Contribute to Ethical Problems in Patient Care? A Scoping Review and Case Series of Clinical Ethics Consultations.","authors":"Jan Schürmann, Stella Reiter-Theil","doi":"10.1086/729414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractBackground: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are frequently exposed to ethical problems in patient care that can affect the quality of care. Understanding risk factors for ethical problems may help practitioners to address these problems at an early stage. This study aims to provide an overview of ethical risk factors in patient care. Risk factors known from the literature and those found in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) cases are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of ethical risk factors in patient care and a CEC case series were conducted, analyzing the documentation (consultation reports, feedback forms, electronic medical records) of 204 CECs from 2012 to 2020 at a somatic and a psychiatric university hospital in Basel, Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine ethical risk factors were identified in nine articles, related to four risk areas: patient (41), family (12), healthcare team (29), and system (17). Eighty-seven of these risk factors were documented at least once in the CEC case series. The most prevalent risk factors in the consultations studied were patient vulnerability (100%), missing or unclear hospital ethics policy (97.1%), shift work (83.3%), lack of understanding between patient and HCP (73.5%), poor communication (66.2%), disagreement between patient and HCP about care (58.8%), and multiple care teams (53.4%). The prevalence differed significantly by medical specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are highly prevalent ethical risk factors at all levels of clinical care that may be used to prevent ethical problems. Further empirical research is needed to analyze risk ratios and to develop specific risk profiles for different medical specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":"35 2","pages":"119-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/729414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are frequently exposed to ethical problems in patient care that can affect the quality of care. Understanding risk factors for ethical problems may help practitioners to address these problems at an early stage. This study aims to provide an overview of ethical risk factors in patient care. Risk factors known from the literature and those found in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) cases are reviewed.

Methods: A scoping review of ethical risk factors in patient care and a CEC case series were conducted, analyzing the documentation (consultation reports, feedback forms, electronic medical records) of 204 CECs from 2012 to 2020 at a somatic and a psychiatric university hospital in Basel, Switzerland.

Results: Ninety-nine ethical risk factors were identified in nine articles, related to four risk areas: patient (41), family (12), healthcare team (29), and system (17). Eighty-seven of these risk factors were documented at least once in the CEC case series. The most prevalent risk factors in the consultations studied were patient vulnerability (100%), missing or unclear hospital ethics policy (97.1%), shift work (83.3%), lack of understanding between patient and HCP (73.5%), poor communication (66.2%), disagreement between patient and HCP about care (58.8%), and multiple care teams (53.4%). The prevalence differed significantly by medical specialty.

Conclusions: There are highly prevalent ethical risk factors at all levels of clinical care that may be used to prevent ethical problems. Further empirical research is needed to analyze risk ratios and to develop specific risk profiles for different medical specialties.

哪些因素会导致患者护理中的伦理问题?临床伦理咨询的范围审查和案例系列。
摘要背景:医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在患者护理过程中经常会遇到伦理问题,这些问题可能会影响护理质量。了解伦理问题的风险因素有助于从业人员及早解决这些问题。本研究旨在概述病人护理中的伦理风险因素。对文献中已知的风险因素和临床伦理咨询(CEC)案例中发现的风险因素进行了回顾:方法:通过分析瑞士巴塞尔一家躯体科和一家精神科大学医院 2012 年至 2020 年期间 204 个临床伦理会诊的文件(会诊报告、反馈表、电子病历),对患者护理中的伦理风险因素进行了范围界定综述,并对临床伦理会诊病例进行了系列分析:结果:在九篇文章中发现了 99 个伦理风险因素,涉及四个风险领域:患者(41 个)、家属(12 个)、医疗团队(29 个)和系统(17 个)。这些风险因素中有 87 个在 CEC 病例系列中至少记录过一次。在所研究的会诊中,最普遍的风险因素是患者易受伤害(100%)、医院伦理政策缺失或不明确(97.1%)、轮班工作(83.3%)、患者和医护人员之间缺乏理解(73.5%)、沟通不畅(66.2%)、患者和医护人员对护理存在分歧(58.8%)以及多个护理团队(53.4%)。不同医学专业的发病率差异很大:结论:在临床护理的各个层面都存在非常普遍的伦理风险因素,可用于预防伦理问题。需要进一步开展实证研究,分析风险比率,并针对不同的医学专业制定具体的风险概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Ethics
Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信