Design of the “Future Mobility in Canada Survey” (FMCS) to assess the evolving mobility landscape in urban Canada with an emphasis on automated vehicles

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Samira Hamiditehrani, Darren M. Scott, Matthias N. Sweet
{"title":"Design of the “Future Mobility in Canada Survey” (FMCS) to assess the evolving mobility landscape in urban Canada with an emphasis on automated vehicles","authors":"Samira Hamiditehrani, Darren M. Scott, Matthias N. Sweet","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mobility tool landscape continues to evolve because of shared mobility services, the prospect of automated vehicles (AVs), teleworking, and unpredicted challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical that public and private sector actors understand how travel behavior changes due to these catalysts. A nationwide Canadian survey, called the Future Mobility in Canada Survey (FMCS), was designed to capture the complex decision-making processes of travel behavior changes and the adoption of new mobility tools by assessing individual preferences, affective motivations, and behavioral intentions. FMCS investigated four main areas: (1) respondents’ intentions to adopt AVs, (2) respondents’ use of shared forms of mobility services, (3) respondents’ recent experience with telework and their preferences towards it, and (4) respondents’ behavior across the COVID-19 pandemic for certain modes and telework. FMCS addressed these four areas by collecting responses from 5002 respondents between October and November 2021, across the five largest Canadian census metropolitan areas in terms of population (Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, and Calgary) and Hamilton, which ranked 9th largest in 2021. This paper presents an overview of FMCS, emphasizing novel aspects of the survey design and data collection process reporting response burden and rates, while the major focus of this paper is scrutinizing the steps taken to obtain respondents’ intentions to adopt various types of AVs including shared AVs, pooled AVs, private AVs, and automated shuttle buses. The insights are relevant for other survey-based studies and are applicable for researchers who investigate adoption of new mobility tools and consequent travel behavior changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mobility tool landscape continues to evolve because of shared mobility services, the prospect of automated vehicles (AVs), teleworking, and unpredicted challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical that public and private sector actors understand how travel behavior changes due to these catalysts. A nationwide Canadian survey, called the Future Mobility in Canada Survey (FMCS), was designed to capture the complex decision-making processes of travel behavior changes and the adoption of new mobility tools by assessing individual preferences, affective motivations, and behavioral intentions. FMCS investigated four main areas: (1) respondents’ intentions to adopt AVs, (2) respondents’ use of shared forms of mobility services, (3) respondents’ recent experience with telework and their preferences towards it, and (4) respondents’ behavior across the COVID-19 pandemic for certain modes and telework. FMCS addressed these four areas by collecting responses from 5002 respondents between October and November 2021, across the five largest Canadian census metropolitan areas in terms of population (Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, and Calgary) and Hamilton, which ranked 9th largest in 2021. This paper presents an overview of FMCS, emphasizing novel aspects of the survey design and data collection process reporting response burden and rates, while the major focus of this paper is scrutinizing the steps taken to obtain respondents’ intentions to adopt various types of AVs including shared AVs, pooled AVs, private AVs, and automated shuttle buses. The insights are relevant for other survey-based studies and are applicable for researchers who investigate adoption of new mobility tools and consequent travel behavior changes.

Abstract Image

设计 "加拿大未来交通调查"(FMCS),以评估加拿大城市不断变化的交通状况,重点是自动驾驶汽车
由于共享出行服务、自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的前景、远程办公以及 COVID-19 大流行病等不可预测的挑战,出行工具的格局在不断演变。公共和私营部门的参与者必须了解出行行为如何在这些催化剂的作用下发生变化。一项名为 "加拿大未来机动性调查"(FMCS)的加拿大全国性调查旨在通过评估个人偏好、情感动机和行为意向,捕捉出行行为变化和采用新机动性工具的复杂决策过程。FMCS 主要调查了四个方面:(1)受访者采用自动驾驶汽车的意向;(2)受访者使用共享形式的移动服务的情况;(3)受访者最近的远程工作经验及其偏好;(4)受访者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对某些模式和远程工作的行为。FMCS 在 2021 年 10 月至 11 月间收集了 5002 名受访者的回复,涉及加拿大人口普查中人口最多的 5 个大都市区(多伦多、蒙特利尔、温哥华、渥太华-加蒂诺和卡尔加里)以及 2021 年排名第 9 的汉密尔顿。本文介绍了 FMCS 的概况,强调了调查设计和数据收集过程的新颖之处,报告了回复负担和回复率,而本文的主要重点是仔细研究为获得受访者采用各种类型的自动驾驶汽车(包括共享自动驾驶汽车、集合式自动驾驶汽车、私人自动驾驶汽车和自动穿梭巴士)的意向所采取的步骤。这些见解对其他基于调查的研究具有借鉴意义,也适用于调查新移动工具的采用及随之而来的出行行为变化的研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信