Marian Luctkar-Flude RN, PhD, CCSNE, FCNEI , Jane Tyerman RN, PhD, CCSNE , Monica Larocque RN, MN, NP
{"title":"Pre-simulation Preparation Preferences of Senior Nursing Students: Virtual Simulation Games Versus Traditional Case Studies","authors":"Marian Luctkar-Flude RN, PhD, CCSNE, FCNEI , Jane Tyerman RN, PhD, CCSNE , Monica Larocque RN, MN, NP","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Presimulation preparation is critical to prepare learners to participate fully in clinical simulations; however, many do not complete assigned presimulation activities.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Which presimulation preparation activities will senior nursing students choose and perceive as helpful?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental study evaluated senior nursing student (n = 115) pre-simulation preparation preferences. Students had access to eight activities including a case study and a virtual simulation game (VSG). Participants indicated which activities they completed, and rated the case study and VSG in terms of usability, engagement, and impact on learning.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 57% of participants completed the paper-based case study and 37% played the VSG. Participation in any preparation resulted in significant improvements in competence (t = 2.3; <em>p</em> = .02). Learners rated VSG higher than case study in terms of usability (t = 2.6; <em>p</em> = .01), engagement (t = 2.8; <em>p</em> = .01) and impact on learning (t = 2.4; <em>p</em> = .02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results revealed nursing students have different preferences for pre-simulation preparation. Although more students completed the case study than the VSG, those who played the game rated it higher. This supports providing a choice in presimulation preparation activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000379/pdfft?md5=61fd2380334aa946700a26525342b1b1&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000379-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Presimulation preparation is critical to prepare learners to participate fully in clinical simulations; however, many do not complete assigned presimulation activities.
Research Question
Which presimulation preparation activities will senior nursing students choose and perceive as helpful?
Methods
A quasi-experimental study evaluated senior nursing student (n = 115) pre-simulation preparation preferences. Students had access to eight activities including a case study and a virtual simulation game (VSG). Participants indicated which activities they completed, and rated the case study and VSG in terms of usability, engagement, and impact on learning.
Results
Overall, 57% of participants completed the paper-based case study and 37% played the VSG. Participation in any preparation resulted in significant improvements in competence (t = 2.3; p = .02). Learners rated VSG higher than case study in terms of usability (t = 2.6; p = .01), engagement (t = 2.8; p = .01) and impact on learning (t = 2.4; p = .02).
Conclusion
Results revealed nursing students have different preferences for pre-simulation preparation. Although more students completed the case study than the VSG, those who played the game rated it higher. This supports providing a choice in presimulation preparation activities.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.